Effects of palm trees cover and forest distance on the moss distribution in the National Forest of Silvânia, Goiás, Brazil

Authors

  • Eder Dasdoriano Porfírio Júnior Ministério do Meio Ambiente
  • Walter Santos de Araújo Universidade Fedral de Goiás
  • Vera Lúcia Gomes-Klein

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rbn.v13i1.29754

Keywords:

Xeric environment, cerrado, facilitation, moss-palm tree interaction

Abstract

Facilitation is the ecological process in which a species favors the establishment of another species in a determined environment increasing their survival and reproduction. The occurrence of facilitator plants may be important for the distribution of some species in harsh environments, such as the case of mosses in environments with low humidity and high temperature. Our aim was to investigate if palm trees favor the occurrence of mosses in an area of Cerrado senso stricto in the Floresta Nacional de Silvânia, Goiás, Brazil. For this purpose, we test the effect of abundance and cover of Syagrus flexuosa (Arecaceae) in the Cerrado plots on the richness and abundance of mosses. Additionally, we test if the richness and abundance of mosses are higher in plots close to forest than in most distant plots. Our results showed that plots with higher palm tree cover had higher moss richness and abundance. Nevertheless, the moss distribution was not influenced by palm tree abundance, which can be explained by asymmetric growth pattern of S. flexuosa. Additionally, we found that more distant plots had lower richness and abundance of mosses than the areas closer to the forest. Our outcomes show the mosses- palm tree association may facilitate the occurrence of mosses in dry environments, as the Cerrado senso stricto.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araújo W. S., E. D. Porfírio Júnior, A. Francener & C. F. Hall. 2012. Composição florística e estrutura fitossociológica de áreas de campo sujo e Cerrado sentido restrito na Floresta Nacional de Silvânia, Goiás, Brasil. Revista Ínsula. 41:42-58.

Benavides J. C. & C. A. Gutierrez. 2011. Effect of deforestation in palm-epiphytic bryophyte communities in a cloud forest in the northern Andes. The Bryologist. 114:155-165.

Breshears D. D., J. W. Nyhan, C. E. Heil & B. P. Wilcox. 1998. Effects of woody plants on microclimate in a semiarid woodland: soil temperature and evaporation in canopy and intercanopy patches. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 159:1010-1017.

Brooker R., F. T. Maestre, R. M. Callaway, C. L. Lortie, L. A. Cavieres, G. Kunsler, P. Liancourt, K. Tielbörger, J.M.J. Travis, F. Anthelme, C. Armas, L. Coll, E. Corcket, S. Delzon, E. Forey, Z. Kikvidze, J. Olofsson, F. Pugnaire, C. L. Quiroz, P. Saccone, K. Schiffers, M. Seifan, B. Touzard & R. Michalet. 2008. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology. 96:18-34.

Bruno J. F., J. J. Stachowicz & M. D. Bertness. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological Theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 18:119-125.

Callaway R. M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. The Botanical Review. 61: 306-349.

Callaway R. M., R. W. Brooker, P. Choler, Z. Kikvidze, C. J. Lortiek, R. Michael, L. Paolini, F. I. Pugnaireq, B. Newingham, E. T. Aschehoug, C. Armasq, D. Kikodze & B. J. Cook. 2002. Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature. 417: 844-848.

Carlsson B. A., T. V. Callaghan. 1991. Positive plant interactions in Tundra vegetation and the importance of shelter. Journal of Ecology. 79:973-983.

Caruso A., J. Rudolphi & H. Rydin. 2011. Positive Edge Effects on Forest-Interior Cryptogams in Clear-Cuts. PLoS One. 6:e27936. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027936.

Castro N. M. C. F., K. C. Porto O. Yano & A. A. J. F. Castro. 2002. Levantamento florístico de Bryopsida de cerrado e mata ripícola do Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades, Piauí, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 16:61-76.

Clark T. A. 2012. Bryophyte floristics and ecology in Grand Canyon National Park. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Felfili J. M., C. Sousa-Silva & A. Scariot. 2005. Biodiversidade, ecologia e conservação do Cerrado: avanços do conhecimento, pp. 25-44. In: SCARIOT A., J. C. SOUSA-SILVA & J. M. FELFILI (Orgs.). Cerrado: ecologia, biodiversidade e conservação. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.

Frahm J. P. 2003. Manual of Tropical Bryology. Tropical Bryology 23:9-195.

Francener A., C. F. Hall, E. D. Porfírio Júnior & W. S. Araújo. 2012. Flora fanerogâmica da Floresta Nacional de Silvânia, Goiás, Brasil. Enciclopédia Biosfera. 8:1263-1277.

Goffinet B., W. R. Buck & A.J. Shaw. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. pp. 55-126. In: GOFFINET B. & A. J. SHAW (Eds.). Bryophyte Biology, 2nd edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gradstein S. R., S. P. Churchill & N. Salazar-Allen. 2001. Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. Memoirs of New York Botanical Garden. 86:1-577.

Hallingbäck T. & N. Hodgetts. 2001. Mosses, liverworts & hornworts: a status survey and conservation action plan for bryophytes. Oryx. 35:270–271.

Ingerpuu N., J. Liira & M. Pärtel. 2005. Vascular plants facilitated bryophytes in a grassland experiment. Plant Ecology. 180: 69-75.

Kürschner H. 2004. Life strategies and adaptations in bryophytes from the Near and Middle East. Turkish Journal of Botany. 28:73-84.

Lorenzi H., H. M. Souza, J. T. Medeiros-Costa, L. S. C. Cerqueira & N. Von Behr. 1996. Palmeiras no Brasil: Nativas e Exóticas. Editora Plantarum, Nova Odessa.

Mamede M. A. 2008. Aspectos da ecologia reprodutiva de Syagrus flexuosa Mart. Becc.: Sucesso reprodutivo e persistência em áreas de Cerrado na região do DF. Tese de doutorado. Departamento de ecologia da Universidade de Brasília em ecologia UnB.

Martins R. C. & T. S. Filgueiras. 2006. Arecaceae. In: CAVALCANTI T. B. (Org.): Flora do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Volume 5. EMBRAPA-Cenargen, Brasília.

Mendonça F. & I. M. Danni-Oliveira. 2007. Climatologia: noções básicas e climas do Brasil. Ed. Oficina de Textos, 208 p.

Mishler B. D. 2001. The biology of bryophytes – bryophytes aren’t just small tracheophytes. American Journal of Botany. 88:2129-2131.

Oliveira P. E. & P. E. Gibbs. 2000. Reproductive biology of woody plants in a Cerrado community of Central Brazil. Flora. 195:311-329.

Oliveira-Filho A. T. & J. A. Ratter. 2002. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome, p. 91-120. In: OLIVEIRA P. S. & R. J. MARQUIS (Eds.). The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University, New York.

Pharo E. J. & C. E. Zartman. 2007. Bryophytes in a changing landscape: the hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes. Biological Conservation. 135: 315-325.

Sharp A. J., H. Crum & P. M. Eckel. 1994. The Moss Flora of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. 69:1-1101.

Yano O. 1984. Briófitas. pp. 27-30. In: O. FIDALGO & V.L.R. BONONI (Eds.). Técnicas de coleta, preservação e herborização de material botânico. Série Documentos. São Paulo, Instituto de Botânica.

Yano O. 2004. Novas ocorrências de briófitas para vários estados do Brasil. Acta Amazonica. 34:559-576.

Yano O. & D. F. Peralta. 2007. Musgos (Bryophyta). pp. 1-333. In: RIZZO J. A. (Coord.). Flora dos Estados de Goiás e Tocantins: Criptógamos, v. 6. Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia.

Zonneveld M. J., J. R. Gutiérrez & M. Holmgren. 2012. Shrub facilitation increases plant diversity along an arid scrubland-temperate rain forest boundary in South America. Journal of Vegetation Science. 23:541-551.

Published

2016-12-09

How to Cite

DASDORIANO PORFÍRIO JÚNIOR, E.; SANTOS DE ARAÚJO, W.; GOMES-KLEIN, V. L. Effects of palm trees cover and forest distance on the moss distribution in the National Forest of Silvânia, Goiás, Brazil. Revista de Biologia Neotropical / Journal of Neotropical Biology, Goiânia, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1–7, 2016. DOI: 10.5216/rbn.v13i1.29754. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/RBN/article/view/29754. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles