Mudanças climáticas e prioridades para a conservação da biodiversidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rbn.v11i1.30699Palabras clave:
priorização espacial, mudanças climáticas, diversidade filogenética, diversidade funcional, Mata AtlânticaResumen
Processos globais como a perda de habitat, superexploração de recursos naturais, invasão biológica e mudanças climáticas estão conduzindo muitas espécies à extinção. Nesse cenário de alto risco de extinção, qual deve ser o critério para determinar prioridades de conservação? O que, onde e como proteger a biodiversidade? A resposta não é simples. Entre os efeitos esperados das mudanças climáticas, pode-se incluir o deslocamento das espécies para um espaço climático mais favorável, até mesmo fora de uma unidade de conservação. No entanto, eleger prioridades para a conservação da biodiversidade implica ir além das espécies, fazendo-se necessário a inclusão da história evolutiva e da manutenção dos processos nas comunidades. Aqui, apresentamos um panorama sobre os efeitos das mudanças climáticas sobre biodiversidade e como incluí-los em estudos de priorização espacial para a conservação. Ressaltamos a importância da conservação de anfíbios da Mata Atlântica, grupo mais ameaçado de extinção entre os vertebrados e, finalmente, apresentamos e discutimos estratégias de conservação consideram mais que a riqueza de espécies, incluindo também informações sobre a diversidade filogenética e funcional.Descargas
Citas
Alagador, D., J. O. Cerdeira & M. B. Araújo. 2014. Shifting protected areas: scheduling spatial priorities under climate change. J. Appl. Ecol. 51: 703-713.
Araújo, M. B. 2009. Climate Change and Spatial Conservation Planning. pp. 172-184, In: A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson & H. P. Possingham. (Eds). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Araújo, M.B. & M. New. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 42-47.
Araújo, M.B., D. Alagador, M. Cabeza, D. Nogués-Bravo & W. Thuiller. 2011. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecol. Lett. 14: 484-492.
Balmford A., K. J. Gaston, K.J., S. Blyth, A. James & V. Kapos. 2003. Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100: 1046-1050.
Beresford, A. E., G. M. Buchanan, P.F. Donald, S. H. M. Butchart, L. D. C. Fishpool & C. Rondinini. 2011. Poor overlap between the distribution of Protected Areas and globally threatened birds in Africa. Anim. Conserv. 14: 99-107.
Bottrill, M. C., L. N. Joseph, J. Carwardine, M. C. BodeCook, E. T Game, H. Grantham, S.Kark, S. Linke, E. McDonald-Madden, R. L. Pressey, S. Walker, K.A. Wilson & H. P. Possingham. 2008. Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 649-654.
Brito, D. 2008. Amphibian conservation: Are we on the right track? Biol. Conserv. 141: 2912-2917.
Brooks, T. M., R. A. Mittermeier, G. A. B. Da Fonseca, J. Gerlach, M. Hoffmann, J. F. Lamoreux, C. G. Mittermeier, J. D. Pilgrim & A. S. L. Rodrigues. 2006. Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities. Science 313: 58-61.
Cadotte, M. W., J. Davies, J. Regetz, S. W. Kembel, E. Cleland & T. H. Oakley. 2010. Phylogenetic diversity metrics for ecological communities: integrating species richness, abundance and evolutionary history. Ecol. Lett. 13: 96-105.
Campos, F. S., J. Trindade-Filho, D. Brito, G. A. Llorente & M. Solé. 2014. The efficiency of indicator groups for the conservation of amphibians in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Ecol. Evol 4: 2505-2514.
Cardillo, M., G. Mace, J. L. Gittleman & A. Purvis. 2006. Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 4157-4161.
Carnaval, A. C., M. J. Hickerson, & C. F. B. Haddad. 2009. Stability Predicts Genetic Diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Hotspot. Science 323: 785-789.
Cianciaruso, M. V., M. A. Batalha, K. J. Gaston, & O. L. Petchey. 2009. Including intraspecific variability in functional diversity. Ecology 90: 81-89.
Devictor, V., D. Mouillot, C. Meynard, F. Jiguet, W. Thuiller & N. Mouquet. 2010. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1030-1040.
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., R. D. Loyola, P. Raia, A. O. Mooers & L. M. Bini. 2013. Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 689-695.
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., L. M. Bini, T. F. L. V. B. Rangel, R.D. Loyola, C. Hof & M. B. Araújo. 2009. Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography 32: 897-906.
Engler, R., C. F. Randin, W. Thuiller, S. Dullinger, N. E. Zimmermann, M. B. Araújo, P. B. Pearman, G. L. L. Lay, C. Piedallu, C. H. Albert, P. Choler, G. Coldea, X. D. Lamo, T. Dirbonk, J. C. Gégout, D. Gómez-García, J. A. Grytnes, E. Heegaard, F. Høistad, D. Nogués-Bravo, S. Normand, M. Puscas, M. T. Sebastià, A. Stanisci, J. P Theurillat, M. R. Trivedi, P. Vittoz & A. Guisan. 2011. 21st Century Climate Change Threatens Mountain Flora Unequally Across Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 17: 2330-2341.
Faith, D. P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61: 1-10.
Faleiro, F. V., Machado, R.B. & R. D. Loyola. 2013. Defining spatial conservation priorities in the face of land-use and climate change. Biol. Conserv. 158: 248-257.
Ferrier, S. & B. A. Wintle. 2009. Quantitative Approaches to Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Matching the Solution to the Need.
pp. 172-184. In: A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson & H. P. Possingham. (Eds). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Frost, D.R. 2013. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History. New York, USA. Disponível em: < http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html>.
Garcia, R. A., N. D. Burgess, M. Cabeza, C. Rahbek & M. B. Araújo, M. B. 2012. Exploring consensus in 21st century projections of climatically suitable areas for African vertebrates. Glob. Change Biol. 18: 1253-1269.
Garcia, M. Cabeza, C. Rahbek & M. B. Araújo. 2014. Multiple Dimensions of Climate Change and Their Implications for Biodiversity. Science 344:1247579.
Haddad, C. F. & C. P. Prado. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience 55: 207-217.
Haddad, C.F.B., L. F. Toledo, C. P. A. Prado, D. Loebmann, J. L. Gasparini & I. Sazima. 2013. Guia dos anfíbios da Mata Atlântica: Diversidade e Biologia. Anolisbook, São Paulo, 544p.
Haines-Young, R. & M. Potschin. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. p:110-139. In: R. Bardgett, M. Usher & D. Hopkins (eds) Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hannah, L., G. Midgley, S. Andelman, M. B. Araújo, G. Hughes, E. Martinez-Meyer, R. Pearson & P. Williams. 2007. Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5: 131-138.
Heller, N. E. & E. S. Zavaleta. 2009. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol. Conserv. 142: 14-32.
Hijmans, R.J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones & A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IUCN. 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. < http://www.iucnredlist.org >. Consulta em 30 de novembro 2013.
Knight, A., R. M. Cowling, H. P. Possinghma & K.A. Wilson. 2009. From Theory to Practice: Designing and Situating Spatial Prioritization Approaches to Better Implement Conservation Action. pp. 249-258, In: A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson & H. P. Possingham. (Eds). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ladle, R.J., P. Jepson & L. Gillson. 2011. Social values and conservation biogeography. In: Ladle, R.J., Whittaker, R.J (ed).Conservation Biogeography, Wiley-Blackwell. 301p
Lemes, P. & R. D. Loyola. 2013. Accommodating species climatforced dispersal and uncertainties in spatial conservation planning. PLoS ONE 8: e54323.
Lemes, P., F. A. M. V. Faleiro, G. Tessarolo & R. D. Loyola. 2011. Refinando Dados Espaciais para a Conservação da Biodiversidade. Nat. Conservacao 9: 240–243.
Lemes, P., A. S. Melo & R. D. Loyola. 2014. Climate change threatens protected areas of the Atlantic Forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 23: 357–368.
Lenoir, J., B. J. Graae, P. A. Aarrestad, I. Greve, A. S. S. Armbruster, G. Austrheim, C. Bergendorff, H. J. B. Birks, K. A. Brathen, J. G. Brunet, H. H. Bruun, C. J. Dahlberg, G. Decocq, M. Diekmann, M. Dynesius, R. Ejrnæs, J. A. Grytnes, K. Hylander, K. Klanderud, M. Luoto, A. Milbau, M. Moora, B. Nygaard, A. Odland, V. T. Ravolainen, S. Reinhardt, S. M. Sandvik, F. H. Schei, J. D. M. Speed, L. U. Tveraabak, V. Vandvik, L. V. Velle, R. Virtanen, M. Zobel & J. C. Svenning. 2013. Local temperatures inferred from plant communities suggest strong spatial buffering of climate warming across Northern Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 19: 1470-1481.
Lion M. B., A. A. Garda & C. R. Fonseca. 2014. Split distance: a key landscape metric shaping amphibian population and communities in forest fragments. Divers. Dist. 20: 1245-1257.
Loiselle, B. A., C. A. Howell, C. H. Graham, J. M. Goerck, T. Brooks, K. G. Smith & P. H. Williams. 2003. Avoiding Pitfalls of Using Species-Distribution Models in Conservation Planning. Conserv. Biol. 17: 1-10.
Loreau, M., A. Oteng-Yeboah, M. T. K. Arroyo, D. Babin, R. Barbault, M. Donoghue, M. Gadgil, C. Häuser, C. Heip, A. Larigauderie, K. Ma, G. Mace, H. A. Mooney, C. Perrings, P. Raven, J. Sarukhan, P. Schei, R. J. Scholes & R. T. Watson. 2006. Diversity without representation. Nature 442: 245-246.
Loyola, R. D., P. Lemes, F. V. Faleiro, J. Trindade-Filho, R. B. Machado. 2012. Severe loss of suitable climatic conditions for marsupial species in Brazil: challenges and opportunities for conservation. PLoS ONE 7: e46257.
Loyola, R. D., P. Lemes, J. C. Nabout, J. Trindade-Filho, M. D. Sagnori, R. Dobrovolski & J. A. F. Diniz-Filho. 2013. A straightforward conceptual approach for evaluating spatial conservation priorities under climate change. Biod. Conserv. 22: 483-495.
Loyola, R. D., Lemes, P., Brum, F. T., Provete, D. B. & L. D. S. Duarte. 2014. Clade-specific consequences of climate change to amphibians in Atlantic Forest protected areas. Ecography 37: 65-72.
Loyola, R.D., C. G. Becker, U. Kubota, C. F. B. Haddad, C. R. Fonseca & T. M. Lewinsohn. 2008. Hung out to dry: choice of priority ecoregions for conserving threatened Neotropical anurans depend on their life-history traits. PLoS ONE 3: e2120.
Machado, N. & R. D. Loyola. 2013. A Comprehensive Quantitative Assessment of Bird Extinction Risk in Brazil. PLoS ONE 8: e72283.
Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. 215p Margules, C. R. & R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243–253.
Margules, C.R. & S. Sarkar. 2007. Systematic Conservation Planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 269p.
Meir, E., S. Andelman & H. P. Possingham, H.P. 2004. Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol. Lett. 7: 615-622.
Meller, L., M. Cabeza, S. Pironon, M. Barbet–Massin, L. Maiorano, D. Georges & W. Thuiller. 2014. Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks. Divers. Distrib. 20: 309-321.
Mittermeier, R.A., P. Robles-Gil, M. Hoffman, J. Pilgrim, T. Brooks, C. G. Mittermeier, C. G. Lamoreux & G. A. B. Da Fonseca. 2004. Hotspots revisited: Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. CEMEX, Conservation International, and Agrupación Sierra Madre, Monterrey, México
Moilanen, A., H. Kujala & J. R. Leathwick. 2009a. The Zonation Framework and Software for Conservation Prioritization. pp. 192-210. In: A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson & H. P. Possingham. (Eds.). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Moilanen, A., H. P. Possingham & S. Polasky. 2009b. A Mathematical Classification of Conservation Prioritization Problems. In: A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson & H. P. Possingham. (Eds.). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. pp. 249-258, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mouchet, M. A., S. Villéger, N. W. H. Mason & D. Mouillot. 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct. Ecol. 24: 867-876.
Myers, N. 1979. The sinking Ark. A new look at the problem of disappearing species. Pergamon, New York.
Pavoine, S. & M. B. Bonsall. 2011. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. 86: 792-812.
Petchey, O.L. & K. J. Gaston. 2002. Functional Diversity (FD), species richness, and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 5: 402-411.
Petchey, O.L. & K. J. Gaston. 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9: 741-758.
Peterson, A.T., J. Soberón, R. G. Pearson, R.P. Anderson, E. Martínez-Meyer, M. Nakamura & M. B. Araújo. 2011. In: H.S. Horn & Levin S.A. (Eds.). Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 316p.
Rangel, T.F. & R. D. Loyola. 2012. Labeling ecological niche models. Nat. Conservacao 10: 119-126.
Ribeiro, M. C., J. P. Metzger, A. C. Martensen, F. J. Ponzoni & M. M. Hirota. 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 142: 1141-1153.
Ricketts, T. H., Dinerstein, E., Boucher, T., Brooks, T. M., Butchart, S. H.M., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J.F., Morrinson, J., Parr, M., Pilgrim, J.D., Rodrigues, A.S., Sechrest, W., Wallace, G.E., Berlin, K., , J., Burguess, N.D., Church, D.R., Cox, N., Knox, D., Loucks, C., Luck, G.W., Master, L.L., Moore, R., Naidoo, R., Ridgely, R., Schatz, G.E., Shire, G., Strand, H., W. Wettengel & E. Wikramanayake. 2005. Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 18497-18501.
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Grenyer, R., Baillie, J. E. M., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittlemann, J. L., Hoffmann, M., Safi, K., Schipper, J., Stuart, S. N. & T. Brooks. 2011. Complete, accurate, mammalian phylogenies aid conservation planning, but not much. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 2652-2960.
Safi, K., M. V. Cianciaruso, R. D. Loyola, D. Brito, K. Armour-Marshall & J. A. F. Diniz-Filho. 2011. Understanding global patterns of mammalian functional and phylogenetic diversity. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 366: 2536-2544.
Strecker, A. L., Olden, J. D., Whittier, J. B. & C. P. Paukert. 2011. Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity. Ecol. Appl. 21, 3002-3013.
Tabarelli, M., A. V. Aguiar, M. C. Ribeiro, J. P. Metzger & C. A. Peres. 2010. Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: Lessons from aging human-modified landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2328-2340.
Thuiller, W., L. Brotons, M. B. Araújo & S. Lavorel. 2004. Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography 27: 165-172.
Thuiller, W., B. Lafourcade, R. Engler & M. B. Araújo. 2009. BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32: 369-373.
Thuiller, W., S. Lavergne, C. Roquet, I. Boulangeat, B. Lafourcade & M. B. Araújo. 2011. Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe. Nature 470: 531-534.
Trindade-Filho, J., R. A. Carvalho, D. Brito & R. D. Loyola. 2012. How does the inclusion of Data Deficient species change conservation priorities for amphibians in the Atlantic Forest? Biod. Conserv. 21: 2709-2718.
Tsianou, M. A., A. D. Mazaris, A. S. Kallimanis, P. K. Deligioridi, E. Apostolopoulou & J. D. Pantis. 2013. Identifying the criteria underlying the political decision for the prioritization of the Greek Natura 2000 conservation network. Biol. Conserv. 166: 103-110.
Warren, R., J. VanDerWal, J. Price, J. A. Welbergen, I. Atkinson, J. Ramirez-Villegas, T. J. Osborn, A. Jarvis, L. P. Shoo, S. E. Williams & J. Lowe. 2013. Quantifying the benefit of early climate change mitigation in avoiding biodiversity loss. Nat. Clim. Change 3: 678-682.
Webb, C. O., D. D. Ackerly, M. A. McPeek & M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogenies and Community Ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 475-505.
Williams, P. H., L. Hannah, S. Andelman, G. Midgley, M. B. Araújo, G. Hughes, L. Manne, E. Martinez-Meyer, R. Pearson & K. A. Wilson. 2005. Planning for Climate Change: Identifying Minimum-Dispersal Corridors for the Cape Proteaceae. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1063-1074.
Wilson, K. A. 2010. Dealing with Data Uncertainty in Conservation Planning. Nat. Conservação. 8: 145-150.
Winter, M., V. Devictor & O. Schweiger. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 199-204.
Zupan, L., M. Cabeza, L. Maiorano, C. Roquet, V. Devictor, S. Lavergne, D. Mouillot, N. Mouquet, J. Renaud & W. Thuiller. 2014. Spatial mismatch of phylogenetic diversity across three vertebrate groups and protected areas in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 20: 674-685.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
La sumisión espontánea de trabajos automáticamente implica en la cesión integral de los derechos patrimoniales a la Revista de Biologia Neotropical / Journal of Neotropical Biology (RBN), después de la publicación. El autor concede a la RBN el derecho de la primera publicación de su articulo, licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Lo son garantizados a los autores los derechos autorales y morales de cada uno de los artículos publicados por la RBN, permitiéndoles:
1. El uso del artículo y de suyo contenido para el propósito de enseñanza y de investigación.
2. Divulgación del artículo y de suyo contenido, si lo hacer el link para el Artículo en sitio web de la RBN, permitiéndole la divulgación en:
- redes cerradas de instituciones (intranet).
- repositorios de acceso abierto.
3. Elaboración y divulgación de obras resultantes del artículo y de suyo contenido, si lo hacer la citación de la publicación original en la RBN.
4. Hacer copias impresas en pequeñas cantidades para uso personal.
