Comparative analysis of birdlife in different ecological restoration methods with emphasis in the role of artificial perches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rbn.v14i2.47000Palavras-chave:
Atlantic rain forest, ecological succession, neotropical birds, restoration ecology.Resumo
Artificial perches provide complexity to the landscape, a factor that can increase animal biodiversity. We tested the hypothesis that artificial perches used in ecological restoration promoting increased of the specific birdlife diversity in a restored landscape in southern Brazil. The study was conducted in the southwest of Paraná State, in an area that served for years to agriculture and pasture. Estimates of species and diversity of avifauna in 12 experimental plots were obtained one year after the beginning of the restoration. Data from plots restored through nucleation (this method consists too insert artificial perches) were used to create a data set analyzed with and without the records of birds obtained exclusively on artificial perches. These data were compared with those from experimental plots re-vegetated by either passive or active restoration (high diversity planting). In addition, we investigated the ability of different restoration techniques to attract avifauna occurring in a nearby forest. Restored plots using nucleation had higher richness (42± 3.00SD species), abundance and diversity compared to passive restoration and high diversity planting. However, when the results obtained exclusively from artificial perches were disregarded, the pattern of the diversity components in the nucleation did not differ from that of the passive restoration. Thus, the artificial perches provided an additional niche and, in this study, represented 34% of the increase in the accumulated richness observed in nucleation. Thus, perches are an important natural engineering structure that causes local increase in bird richness.
Downloads
Referências
Akçakaya, H. R., G. Mills & C.P. Doncaster. 2007. The role of metapopulations in conservation, p.64–84. In: D.W. Macdonald & K. Service (Ed.). Key Topics in Conservation Biology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Almeida, A.; H. T. Z. Couto & A. F. Almeida. 2003. Diversidade beta de aves em habitats secundários da Pré-Amazônia maranhense e interação com modelos nulos. Ararajuba. 11(1): 157-171.
Anderson, M. L. 1953. Spaced-Group planting. Unasylva. 7(2):1-15.
Anjos, L. 2004. Species richness and relative abundance of birds in natural and anthropogenic fragments of Brazilian Atlantic forest. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 76(2):429–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S000137652004000200036
Anjos, L. 2006. Bird Species Sensitivity in a Fragmented Landscape of the Atlantic Forest in Southern Brazil1. Biotropica. 38(2):229–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.17447429.2006.00122.x
Anjos, L. 2007. A eficiência do método de amostragem por pontos de escuta na avaliação da riqueza de aves. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 15(2): 239–243.
Athiê, S. & M. M. Dias. 2012. Frugivoria por aves em um mosaico de Floresta Estacional Semidecidual e refl orestamento misto em Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 26(1): 84–93. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0102-33062012000100010
Báldi, A. & P. Batári. 2011. Spatial heterogeneity and farmland birds: different perspectives in Western and Eastern Europe. Ibis 153: 875–876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1474-919X.2011.01169.x
Banks, A. J. & T. E. Martin. 2001. Host activity and the risk of nest parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds. Behavioral Ecology. 12(1): 31–40.
Bechara, F. C., S. J. Dickens, E. C. Farrer, L. Larios, E. N. Spotswood, P. Mariotte & K. N. Suding 2016. Neotropical rainforest restoration: comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation. 25: 2021-2034.
Beltrame, T. P. & E. Rodrigues. 2008. Comparação de diferentes densidades de feijão guandu (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) na restauração florestal de uma área de reserva legal no Pontal do Paranapanema, SP. Scientia Forestalis. 36(80): 317-327.
Bibby, C.J., N. D. Burgess, D. A. Hill & S. H. Mustoe. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London
Bispo, A. A. & P. Scherer-Neto. 2010. Avian assemblage in a remnant of the Araucaria Forest in the Southeast Parana, Brazil. Biota Neotrópica. 10(1):121–130. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000100012
Bocchese, R. A., A. K. M., Oliveira, S. Favero, S. J. S. Garnés & V. A. Laura. 2008. Chuva de sementes e estabelecimento de plântulas a partir da utilização de árvores isoladas e poleiros artificiais por aves dispersoras de sementes, em área de Cerrado, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 16(3):207–213.
Bornschein, M. R. & B. L. Reinert. 2000. Aves em três remanescentes florestais no norte do estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil, com sugestões para conservação e manejo. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 17(3):615–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010181752000000300008
Brady, C. J. & R. A. Noske. 2010. Succession in Bird and Plant Communities over a 24-Year Chronosequence of Mine Rehabilitation in the Australian Monsoon Tropics. Restoration Ecology. 18(6): 855–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526100X.2008.00511.x
Cardoso-da-Silva, J. M., C. Uhl & G. Murray. 1996. Plant succession, Landscape Manegement, and the Ecology of Frugivorous Birds in Abandoned Amazonian Pastures. Conservation Biology. 10(2): 491–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/ j.1523-1739.1996.10020491.x
Carvalho, M. M., V. P. Freitas & A. C. Andrade. 1995. Crescimento inicial de cinco gramíneas tropicais em um sub-bosque de angico vermelho (Anadenanthera macrocarpa Benth.). Pasturas Tropicales. 17(1): 24–30.
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral Ecology. 18(1): 117–143. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993. tb00438.x
Colwell, R. K. 2011. EstimateS, Version 8.2: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. http:// viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
Colwell, R. K., C. X. Mao & J. Chang. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology. 85(10): 2717–2727. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0557
Corbin, J. D. & K. D. Holl. 2012. Applied nucleation as a forest restoration strategy. Forest Ecology and Management. 265 (1): 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.013
Corder G. W. & D. I. Foreman. 2009. Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: a step-by-step approach. Wiley, New Jersey.
Esler, D. 2000. Applying Metapopulation Theory to Conservation of Migratory Birds. Conservation Biology. 14(2):366–372.
Fink, R. D., C.A. LIndell, E.B.R. Morrison, A. Zahawi & K.D. Holl. 2009. Patch Size and Tree Species Influence the Number and Duration of Bird Visits in Forest Restoration Plots in Southern Costa Rica. Restoration Ecology. 17(4):479–486. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00383.x
Fuller, R.J. 2012. The bird and its habitat: an overview of concepts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fuller, R. J., D. E. Chamberlain, N. H. K Burton & S. J. Gough. 2001. Distributions of birds in lowland agricultural landscapes of England and Wales: How distinctive are bird communities of hedgerows and woodland? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 84(1): 79–92.
Gabriel, V. A. & M. A. Pizo. 2005. Foraging behavior of tyrant flycatchers (Aves, Tyrannidae) in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 22(4): 1072–1077. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000400036
Gandolfi, S., S. V. Martins & R. R. Rodrigues. 2007. Forest Restoration: Many Views and Objectives. High Diversity Forest Restoration in Degraded Areas, Nova Science Publishers INC, New York.
Gasperin, G. & M. A. Pizo. 2012. Passage time of seeds through the guts of frugivorous birds, a first assessment in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 20(1): 48–51.
Gerber, D., T. Y. Kiwara, P. R. Souza, M. Lubke, E. S. Vismara & F. C. Bechara. 2017. Canopy and invasive grasses cover effects in distinct ecological restoration technologies: 5-y monitoring in a Brazilian subtropical forest. Acta Biológica Catarinense. 4,: 54-59.
Golawski, A. & S. Golawska. 2013. Are the birds dangerous for insect pollinators? The relationship between hymenopterans and the red-backed shrike. Journal of Insect Conservation. 17: 1155-1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9596-2
Gonçalves, R. M. G., E. Giannotti, J. D. G. Giannotti & A. A. Silva. 2005. Aplicação de modelo de Revegetação em áreas degradadas, visando à restauração ecológica da Microbacia do córrego da Fazenda Itaqui, no município de Santa Gertrudes, SP. Revista do Instituto Florestal. 17(1): 73–95.
Gorenstein M. R., F. C. Bechara, D. A. Estevan, A. S. Sgarbi & I. C. Gallo. 2011. Estrutura e diversidade da comunidade arbórea na trilha ecológica da UTFPR, Campus Dois Vizinhos através do método de Quadrantes. In V Seminário: Sistemas de Produção Agropecuária - Ciências Agrárias, Animais e Florestais – UTFPR. Dois Vizinhos, 2011. Anais... 1: 01-05.
Graham, L. L. B. & S. E. Page. 2012. Artificial Bird Perches for the Regeneration of Degraded Tropical Peat Swamp Forest: A Restoration Tool with Limited Potential. Restoration Ecology, 20(5): 631–637. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00805.x
Guedes, M. C., V. A. Melo & J. J. Griffith. 1997. Uso de poleiros artificiais e ilhas de vegetação por aves dispersoras de sementes. Ararajuba. 52(2): 229–232.
Hall, T. R., W. E. Howard & R. E. Marsh. 1981. Raptor Use of Artificial Perches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9: 296–298.
Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper & P. D. Ryan. 2001. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4(1): 01–09.
Haslem, A. & A.F. Bennett. 2008. Countryside elements and the conservation of birds in agricultural environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 125(1-4):191–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. agee.2008.01.001
Herzon, I., R. Marja, S. Menshikova & A. Kondratyev. 2014. Farmland bird communities in an agricultural landscape in Northwest Russia: Seasonal and spatial patterns. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 183: 78–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. agee.2013.10.015
Holl, K. D. 1998. Do Bird Perching Structures Elevate Seed Rain and Seedling Establishment in Abandoned Tropical Pasture? Restoration Ecology. 6(3): 253–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526100X.1998.00638.x
Holl,K.D., M.E. Loik, E.H.V. Lin & I.A. Samuels. 2000. Tropical Montane Forest restoration in Costa Rica: Overcoming Barriers to Dispersal and Establishment. Restoration Ecology. 8(4): 339–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80049.x
Horgan, F. G., A. F. Ramal, J. M. Villegas, M. L. P. Almazan, C. C. Bernal, J. M. P. Jamoralin, M. L. P. Almazan, C. C. Bernal, A. Jamoralin, J. M. Pasang, G. Orboc, V. Agreda & C. Arroyo. 2016. Ecological engineering with high diversity vegetation patches enhances bird activity and ecosystem services in Philippine rice fields. Regional Environmental Change. 6: 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0984-5
Hurlbert, A. H. 2004. Species-energy relationships and habitat complexity in bird communities. Ecology Letters. 7(8): 714–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14610248.2004.00630.x
Jesus, S. & E. L. A. Monteiro-Filho, 2007. Frugivoria por aves em Schinus terebinthifolius (Anacardiaceae) e Myrsine coriacea (Myrsinaceae). Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 15(4): 585–591.
Johnson, R. A. & D. W. Wichern. 2007. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6. ed. Prentice Hall, Nova York.
Jordan, W. R., M. E. Gilpin & J. D. Aber, 2003. Restoration ecology: A synthetic approach to ecological restoration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kaminski, N. 2013. Consumo de frutos por três espécies de Picidae em área de Floresta Ombrófla Mista de Santa Catarina. Biotemas 26(3): 261–263. http://dx.doi. org/10.5007/2175-7925.2013v26n3p261
Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York.
Lindell, C. A., R. J Cole, K. D. Holl & R. A. Zahawi. 2012. Migratory bird species in young tropical forest restoration sites: effects of vegetation height, planting design, and season. Bird Conservation International. 22(1):94–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0959270911000177
Lindenmayer, D. B., E. J. Knight, M. J. Crane, R. Montague-Drake, D. R. Michael & C. I Macgregor. 2010. What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biological Conservation 143: 289–301.
Martins-Oliveira, L., R. Leal-Marques, C.H Nunes, A. G. Franchin & Marçal-Júnior, O. 2012. Forrageamento de Pitangus sulphuratus e de Tyrannus melancholicus (Aves: Tyrannidae) em habitats urbanos. Bioscience Journal 28(6):1038–1050.
Marzluff, J.M. & K. Ewing. 2001. Fragmented Landscapes for the Conservation of Birds: A General Framework and Specific Recommendations for Urbanizing Landscapes. Restoration Ecology 9(3): 280–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/ j.1526-100x.2001.009003280.x
McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford. 2011. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Oregon: MjM Software.
McDonnel, M. J. & E. W. Stiles. 1983. The structural complexity of old field vegetation and recruitment of bird-dispersed plant species. Oecologia 56(1):109–116.
Melo, A. S. 2008. O que ganhamos “confundindo” riqueza de espécies e equabilidade em um índice de diversidade? Biota Neotropica. 8(3): 21–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1676-06032008000300001
Mota-Gomes, V. S., M. C. R. Correia, H. A. Lima & M. A. S. Alves. 2008. Potential role of frugivorous birds (Passeriformes) on seed dispersal of six plant species in a restinga habitat, southeastern Brazil. Revista de Biología Tropical. 56 (1): 205–216.
Odum, E. P. 1950. Bird populations of the Highlands (North Carolina) Plateau in relation to plant succession and avian invasion. Ecology. 31:587–605. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1931577
Ortega-Álvarez, R., R. Lindig-Cisneros, I. Macgregor-Fors, K. Renton & J. E. Schondube. 2013. Avian community responses to restoration efforts in a complex volcanic landscape. Ecological Engineering 53: 275–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.058
Piacentini V. Q., A. Aleixo, C. E. Agne, G. N. Maurício, J. F. Pacheco, G. A. Bravo, G. R. R. Brito, L. N. Naka, F. Olmos, S. Posso, L. F. Silveira, G. S. Betini, E. Carrano, I. Franz, A. C. Lees, L. M. Lima, D. Pioli, F. Schunck, F. R. Amaral, G. A. Bencke, M. Cohn-Haft, L. F. A Figueiredo, F. C. Straube & E. Cesari. 2015. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia. 23(2): 91-298.
Pias, K. E., Z. C. Welch & W. M. Kitchens. 2012. An Artificial Perch to Help Snail Kites Handle an Exotic Apple Snail. Waterbirds. 35(2): 347–351. http://www.bioone.org/ doi/full/10.1675/063.035.0217
Pillatt, N., N. Pillatt, E. T. H. F. Franco & G. C. Coelho. 2010. Dry artifcial perches and the seed rain in a subtropical riparian forest. Brazilian Journal of Biosciences. 8(3):246–252.
Pizo, M. A. 2004. Frugivory and habitat use by fruit-eating birds in a fragmented landscape of southeast Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical. 15 (suppl.): 117–126.
Pizo, M. A. 2007. Frugivory by birds in degraded areas of Brazil. In: A.J. Dennis, E. W. Schupp, R. J. Green & D.W. Westcot (Eds.). Seed dispersal - theory and its application in a changing world, p. 615–627. Oxford shire, UK: CAB International, Oxford.
Poletto, F., L. Anjos, E. V. Lopes, G. H. Volpato, P.P. Serafini & F. L. Favaro. 2004. Caracterização do microhabitat e vulnerabilidade de cinco espécies de arapaçus (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae) em fragmento florestal do norte do estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil. Ararajuba. 12(2): 89–96.
Preacher, K. J. 2001. Calculation for the Chi-Square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence. Retrieved from http:// quantpsy.org.
Quinn, G. P. & M. J. Keough. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Reis, A., F. C. Bechara, M. B. Espíndola, N. K. Vieira & L.L. Sousa. 2003. Restauração de áreas degradadas: a nucleação como base para incrementar os processos sucessionais. Natureza & Conservação. 1(1): 28–36.
Reis, A., F. C. Bechara & D. R. Tres. 2010. Nucleation in tropical ecological restoration. Scientia Agrícola 67(2): 244–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010390162010000200018
Reis, A., D. R. Tres & E. C. Scariot. 2007. Restauração da Floresta Ombrófila Mista através de sucessão natural. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira. 55(2): 67–73.
Reid, J. L., J. Berton, C. Harris & R. A. Zahawi. 2012a. Avian Habitat Preference in Tropical Forest Restorationin Southern Costa Rica. Biotropica. 44(3):350–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.17447429.2011.00814.x
Rey-Benayas, J. M., J. M. Bullock & A. C. Newton. 2008. Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 6(6): 329– 336. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/070057
Ries, L. & T. D. Sisk. 2010. What is an edge species? The implications of sensitivity to habitat edges. Oikos. 119(10): 1636–1642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.16000706.2010.18414.x
Rodrigues, R. R., R. A. F. Lima, S Gandolfi & A. G. Nave. 2009. On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation. 142(6): 1242–1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.008
Rodrigues, R. R., S. Gandolfi, A. G. Nave, J. Aronson, T. E. Barreto, C. Y. Vidal & P. H. S. Brancalion. 2011. Large-scale ecological restoration of high diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management. 261(10): 1605–1613. http://dx.doi. org/doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.005
Sanderson, F. J., M. Kucharz, M. Jobda & P. F. Donald. 2013. Impacts of agricultural intensification and abandonment on farmland birds in Poland following EU accession. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 168: 16–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. agee.2013.01.015
Scherer-Neto, P. & M. C. B Toledo. 2012. Bird community in an Araucaria forest fragment in relation to changes in the surrounding landscape in Southern Brazil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 102(4): 412–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S007347212012000400007
Schieck, J. & S. J. Song. 2006. Changes in bird communities throughout succession following fire and harvest in boreal forests of western North America: literature review and meta-analyses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 36: 1299–1318. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1139/x06-017
Sekercioglu, C. H. 2012. Bird functional diversity and ecosystem services in tropical forests, agroforests and agricultural areas. Journal of Ornithology. 153(1):153-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-0120869-4
Sheldon, K. S. & N. M. Nadkarni. 2013. The use of pasture trees by birds in a tropical montane landscape in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 29(5):459–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0266467413000503
Shiels, A.B. & L. R. Walker. 2003. Birds Perches Increase Forest Seeds on Puerto. Restoration Ecology 11: 457-465.
Shono, K., E. A. Cadaweng & P. B. Durst. 2007. Application of Assisted Natural Regeneration to Restore Degraded Tropical Forestlands. Restoration Ecology 15(4): 620–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1526100X.2007.00274.x
Silva, W. R., M. A. Pizo & V. A. Gabriel. 2010. Avifauna como promotora da restauração ecológica. In: S. Von-Matter, F.C. Straube, I. Accoerdi, V. Piacentini & J. F. Cândido-Jr (Eds.). Ornitologia e Conservação: Ciência Aplicada, Técnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento, p. 507–516. Rio de Janeiro, Technical Books Editora.
Statsoft INC. 2004. Statistics for Windows (Software-system for data-analyses). Version 7.0. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Telino-Júnior, W.R., M. M. Dias, S. M. D. A. Júnior, R. M. Lyra-Neves & M. E. L. Larrazábal. 2005. Estrutura trófica da avifauna na Reserva Estadual de Gurjaú, Zona da Mata Sul, Pernambuco, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 22(4): 962–973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S010181752005000400024
Van-Andel, J. & J. Aronson. 2012. Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Verdu, M. & P. Garcia-Fayos. 1996. Nucleation Processes in a Mediterranean Birds-Dispersed Plant. Functional Ecology. 10(2): 275–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2389853
Vicente, R., R. Martins, J. J. Zocche & B. Harter-Marques. 2010. Seed dispersal by birds on artificial perches in reclaimed areas after surface coal mining in Siderópolis municipality, Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biociênicas. 8(1): 14–23.
Vickery, J., N. Carter & R. J. Fuller. 2002. The potential value of managed cereal field margins as foraging habitats for farmland birds in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 89(1-2): 41–52.
Vielliard, J. M. E., M. E. C. Almeida, L. Anjos & W. R. Silva. 2010. Levantamento quantitativo por pontos de escuta e o Índice Pontual de Abunância (IPA), p. 45–60. In: S. Von-Matter, F.C. Straube, I. Accoerdi, V. Piacentini & J. F. Cândido-Jr (Eds.). Technical Books Editora.
Vogel H. F., J. B. Campos & F. C. Bechara. 2015. Early bird assemblages under different subtropical forest restoration strategies in Brazil: passive, nucleation and high diversity plantation. Tropical Conservation Science. 8: 912-939.
Wal, H. V. H., B. Peña-Álvarez, S. L. Arriaga-Weiss & S. Hernández-Daumás. 2012. Species, Functional Groups, and Habitat Preferences of Birds in Five Agroforestry Classes in Tabasco, Mexico. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 124(3): 558–571. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1676/10-111.1
Willson, M. F. 1974. Avian Community Organization and Habitat Structure. Ecology. 55(5):1017–1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940352
Wright, S. J. 1980. Density Compensation in Island Avifaunas. Oecologia. 45(3): 385–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00540211
Wunderle JR., J. M. 1997. The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecology and Management. 99(1-2): 223–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S03781127(97)00208-9
Yarranton, G.A. & R. G. Morrison. 1974. Spatial Dynamics of a Primary Succession: Nucleation. The Journal of Ecology. 62(2): 417–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2258988
Zahawi, R. A., K. D. Holl, R. J. Cole & J. L. Reid. 2013. Testing applied nucleation as a strategy to facilitate tropical forest recovery. Journal of Applied Ecology. 51(1):88-96.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
O envio espontâneo de qualquer submissão implica automaticamente na cessão integral dos direitos patrimoniais à Revista de Biologia Neotropical / Journal of Neotropical Biology (RBN), após a sua publicação. O(s) autor(es) concede(m) à RBN o direito de primeira publicação do seu artigo, licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
São garantidos ao(s) autor(es) os direitos autorais e morais de cada um dos artigos publicados pela RBN, sendo-lhe(s) permitido:
1. Uso do artigo e de seu conteúdo para fins de ensino e de pesquisa.
2. Divulgar o artigo e seu conteúdo desde que seja feito o link para o Artigo no website da RBN, sendo permitida sua divulgação em:
- redes fechadas de instituições (intranet).
- repositórios de acesso público.
3. Elaborar e divulgar obras derivadas do artigo e de seu conteúdo desde que citada a fonte original da publicação pela RBN.
4. Fazer cópias impresas em pequenas quantidades para uso pessoal.
