Temporal distribution, reproductive synchrony, and mating patterns of the explosive breeder frog Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rbn.v19iesp.73785Palabras clave:
mating system, OSR, random mating, reproductive synchrony time lagResumen
The knowledge about natural history of a species is fundamental for the proposition of theories in population, community, and behavioral ecology. Dermatonotus muelleri (Boettger, 1885) is one of the several Neotropical anuran species that still lacks basic information. These frogs are widely distributed in South America and present many peculiar morphological features, such as a reduced head size and a tongue morphology that suggests a specialized diet in ants and termites. However, D. muelleri is rare in anuran surveys, because of the explosive breeding behavior, which restrict its occurrence in aquatic habitats to few days a year, and the semi-fossorial habit, making the individuals inactive during most part of the year. In this study, we describe the reproductive ecology of Dermatonotus muelleri, with special attention to the mechanisms that regulates (i) the reproductive synchrony between males and females and (ii) the operational sex ratio (OSR), and (iii) if size is a good predictor of pairs formation (assortative mating).
Descargas
Citas
Alvarez, B. B., J. A. Cespedez, M. L. Lions, A. Hernando & R. Aguirre, 1996. Herpetofauna da las provincias de Corrientes, Chaco y Formosa (Argentina). Facena. 12: 119-134.
Anderson, S. 1994. Area and endemism. The Quartely Review of Biology. 69(4): 451-471.
Arak, A. 1983. Sexual selection by male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature. 306: 261-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/306261a0
Arak, A. 1988. Callers and satellites in the natterjack toad: evolutionary sTable decision rules. Animal Behaviour. 36(2): 416-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80012-5
Areskoug, V. 2001. Utilization of remnant dry-forest corridors by the native fauna in a pastural landscape in the Paraguayan Chaco. CBM:s Skriftserie, Uppsala, 3: 25-38.
Basalingappa, S. 1970. The differential occurrence of fat in the various castes and undifferentiated instars of the termite Odontotermes assmuthi – the result of discriminate feeding. Journal of Animal Morphology and Physiology. 17 (1-2): 106-110.
Bastos, R. P., J. A. O. Motta, L. P. Lima & L. D. Guimarães. 2003. Anfíbios do Floresta Nacional de Silvânia, Estado de Goiás. Goiânia, Stylo Gráfica e Editora, 82 p.
Beebee, T.J.C. 1996. Ecology and Conservation of Amphibians. London, Chapman & Hall, 214 p.
Bentley, P. J. 1966. Adaptations of Amphibia to arid environments. Science. 152: 610-623. DOI: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.152.3722.619
Brandão, R. A. & A. F. B. Araújo. 1998. Herpetofauna da estação ecológica de águas emendadas. pp. 9-18. In: Marinho-Filho, J., F. Rodrigues & M. Guimarães. (Eds). Vertebrados da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas. Brasília, Governo does Distrito Federal.
Castanho, G. M., C. M. P. Vaz & M. A. S. Machado. 2003. Electroanalytical procedure for the determination of Methylparathion in soil suspensions and its application for sorption studies with brazilian soils. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society. 14(4): 594-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532003000400016
Carvalho, A. L. 1954. A preliminary synopsis of the genera of American microhylids frogs. Ocasional Papers, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan. 555: 1-19.
Cei, J. M. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Firenze, Tipografia Il Sedicesimo, 609 p.
Cmelik, S. H. W. 1969. The neutral lipids from various organs of the termite Macrotermes goliath. Journal of Insect Physiology. 15: 839-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(69)90124-3
Colli, G. R., R. P. Bastos & A. F. B. Araújo. 2002. The character and dynamics of the Cerrado herpetofauna. pp. 223-241. In: Oliveira, P. S. & R. J. Marquis. (Eds.). The Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York, Columbia University Press, 396 p.
Crossland, M. R. & C. Azevedo–Ramos. 1999. Effects of Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) toxins on tadpole from native and exotic Bufo habitats. Herpetologica. 55(2): 192-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3893079
Crossland, M. R. & R. A. Alford. 1998. Evaluation of the toxicity of eggs, hatchlings and tadpoles of the introduced toad Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) to native Australian aquatic predators. Australian Journal of Ecology. 23: 129-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1998.tb00711
Crump, M. & N. J. Scott JR. 1994. Visual encounter Surveys, pp. 84-92. In: Heyer, W. R., M. A. Donnelly, R. W. Mcdiarmid, L. A. C. Hayek & M. S. Foster. (Eds). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity – Standard Methods for Amphibians. Washington D. C., Smithsonian Institution Press.
De La Riva, I., J. Köller, S. Lötters & S. Reichle. 2000. Ten years of research on Bolivian amphibians: update checklist, distribution, taxonomic problems, literature and iconography. Revista Española de Herpetologia. 14: 19-164.
Dimmit, M. A. & R. Ruibal. 1980. Exploitation of food resources by spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus). Copeia. 1980(4): 854-862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1444465
Donnely, M. A. 1989. Demographic effects of reproductive resource supplementation in a territorial frog, Dendrobates pulmilio. Ecological Monographs. 59(3): 207-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1942599
Duellman, W. E. 1999a. Global Distribution of Amphibians: Patterns, Conservation, and Future Challenges. pp. 1-30. In: Duellman, W. E. (Ed). Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: a Global Perspective. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Duellman, W. E. 1999b. Distribution Patterns of Amphibians in South America. pp. 255-329. In: Duellman, W. E. (Ed). Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: a Global Perspective. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Duellman, W. E. & L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of Amphibians. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 670 p.
Echeverría, D. D. & E. O. Lavilla. 2000. Internal oral morphology of tadpoles of Dermatonotus muelleri and Elachistocleis bicolor. Journal of Herpetology. 34(4): 517-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1565265
Fast, P. G. 1964. Insects lipids: a review. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada. 37: 3-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9637fv
Fabrezi, M. & P. Alberch. 1996. The carpal elements of anurans. Herpetologica. 52(2): 188-204.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1994. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annual Revew of Ecology and Systematics. 25: 293-324. DOI: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001453
Giesel, J. T. 1976. Reproductive strategies as adaptations to life in temporally heterogeneous environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 7: 57-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.000421
Greene, H. W. 1986. Natural history and Evolutionary Biology. pp. 99-108. In: Feder, M. E. & G.V. Lauder. (Eds). Predator – Prey Relationships. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
Greene, H. W. 1994. Systematic and natural history, foundations for understanding and conserving biodiversity. The American Zoologist, Chicago, 34: 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/34.1.48
Guimarães, L. D., L. P. Lima, R. F. Juliano & R. P. Bastos. 2001. Vocalizações de espécies de anuros (Amphibia) no Brasil Central. Boletim do Museu Nacional. 474: 1-14. DOI: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/12148
Haddad, C. F. B. 1998. Biodiversidade dos Anfíbios no Estado de São Paulo. pp. 15-26. In: Joly, C. A. & C. E. M. Bicudo. (Org.). Biodiversidade do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil: Síntese do Conhecimento ao Final do Século XX. 6: Vertebrados. São Paulo, FAPESP.
Haddad, C. F. B. & I. Sazima. 1992. Anfíbios anuros da Serra do Japi. pp. 188-211. In: Morellato, L. P. C. (Org). História Natural da Serra do Japi. Campinas, Editora da UNICAMP/FAPESP.
Halliday, T. 1983. Do frogs and toads choose their mates? Nature. 306: 226-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/306226a0.
Heyer, W. R., R. W. Macdiarmid & D. L. Weizmann. 1975. Tadpoles, predation and pond habits in the tropics. Biotropica. 7(2): 100-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2989753
Heyer, W. R. & L. R. Maxson. 1983. Relationships, zoogeography, and speciation mechanisms of frogs of the genus Cycloramphus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Arquivos de Zoologia. 30(5): 341-373.
Heyer, W. R., A. S. Rand & O. L. Peixoto. 1988. Decimations, extinctions, and colonizations of frog populations in southeast Brazil and their evolutionary implications. Biotropica. 20(3): 230-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388238
Heyer, W. R., A. S. Rand; C. A. G. Cruz, O. L. Peixoto & C. E. Nelson. 1990. Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de Zoologia. 31(4): 231-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v31i4p231-410
Jim, J. 1980. Aspectos ecológicos de anfíbios registrados na região de Botucatu, São Paulo (Amphibia, Anura). Tese de Doutoramento. Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, 322 p.
Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. Menlo Park, Addison Wesley Longman Inc, 620 p.
Krebs, J. R. & N. B. Davies. 1996. Introdução à Ecologia Comportamental. São Paulo, Atheneu Editora, 420 p.
Lambshead, P. J. D. & M. Hodda. 1994. The impact of disturbance on measurements of variability in marine nematode populations. Vie et Milieu. 44: 21-27.
Lavilla, E. O. 1992. The tadpole of Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae). Bolletino. Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturales Torino. 10(1): 63-71.
Lavilla, E. O., F. B. Cruz & G. J. Scrocchi. 1995. Amphibiens et reptiles de la station biologique “Los Colorados” dans la province de Salta, Argentine. Revue Française d’Aquarologie. 22(1-2): 51-58.
Lehner, P. N. 1996. Handbook of Ethological Methods. 2 ed. New York, Garland STPM Press, 403 p.
Low, B. S. 1978. Environmental uncertainty and the parental strategies of marsupials and placentals. The American Naturalist, Chicago, 983 (112): 197-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/283260.
Machado, R. A., P. S. Bernarde, S. A. A. Morato & L. Anjos. 1999. Análise comparada da riqueza de anuros entre duas áreas com diferentes estados de conservação no município de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Revta Bras. Zool. 16 (4): 997-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000400009
Martoff, B. S. 1953. Territoriality in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Ecology. 34: 165-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1930316
Mcdiarmid, R. W. & R. Altig. 1999. Research: Materials and Techniques. pp. 7-23. In: Mcdiarmid, R. W. & R. Altig. 1999. Tadpoles: the Biology of Anuran Larvae. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
Nelson, C. E. 1973. Mating calls of the Microhylinae: descriptions and phylogenetic and ecological considerations. Herpetologica. 29: 163-176.
Parker, H. W. 1934. A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae. London, Oxford University Press, 208 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1436128
Pinheiro, R., I.R. Diniz; D. Coelho & M.P.S. Bandeira. 2002. Seasonal pattern of insect abundance in the Brazilian cerrado. Austral Ecology. 27: 132-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2002.01165.x
Rossa-Feres, D. C. & J. Jim. 2001. Similaridade do sítio de vocalização em uma comunidade de anfíbios anuros na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 18 (2): 439-454. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752001000200015
Ruibal, R. & S. Hillman. 1981. Cocoon structure and function in the burrowing hylid frog, Pternohyla fodiens. Journal of Herpetology. 15(4): 402-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1563529
Ruibal, R., L. Tevis JR & V. Roig. 1969. The terrestrial ecology of the spadefoot toad Scaphiopus hammondii. Copeia. 1969(3): 571-584.
Ryan, M. J. 1980. The reproductive behavior of the bullfrog (Rana catesbiana). Copeia. 1980(1): 108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1444139
Ryan, M. J. & A. Keddy-Hector. 1992. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. The American Naturalist. 139(supl.): S4-S35.
Scheltinga, D. M., B. G. M. Jamieson, D. P. Bickford, A. A. Garda, S. N. Báo & K. R. Mcdonald. 2002. Morphology of the spermatozoa of the Microhylidae (Anura, Amphibia). Acta Zoologica. 83: 263-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6395.2002.00066.x
Scott JR, N.J. & B.D. Woodward. 1994. Surveys at breeding sites. pp. 84-92. In: Heyer, W. R., M. A. Donnelly, R. W. Mcdiarmid, L. A. C. Hayek & M. S. Foster. (Eds). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity – Standard Methods for Amphibians. Washington D. C., Smithsonian Institution Press.
Scott JR, N. J. & H. W. Campbell. 1982. A chronological bibliography, the history and status of studies of herpetological communities, and suggestions for future research. pp. 39-47. In: N.J. Scott JR. (Ed.). Herpetological communities. Washington, D. C., Wildlife Research Report.
Sinsch, U. 1988a. Temporal spacing of breeding activity in the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Oecologia. 76: 399-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377035.
Sinsch, U. 1988b. Seasonal changes in the migratory behaviour of the toad Bufo bufo: direction and magnitude of movements. Oecologia. 76: 390-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377034.
Sinsch, U. 1990. Migration and orientation in anurans amphibians. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution. 2: 65-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1990.9525494
Sinsch, U. 1991. Mini-review: the orientation behaviour of amphibians. Herpetological Journal. 1991(1): 541-544.
Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 2: 369-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101
Tejedo, M. 1993. Do male natterjack toads join larger breeding choruses to increase mating success? Copeia. 1993(1): 75-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1446297.
Vizotto, L. D. 1967. Desenvolvimento de anuros da região norte-ocidental do Estado de São Paulo. São José do Rio Preto, Tipografia Rio Preto, 161 p.
Wagner, JR., W. E. & B. K. Sullivan. 1992. Chorus organization in the gulf coast toad (Bufo valliceps). Copeia. 1992(3): 647-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/144614.0
Wells, K. D. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour. 25: 666-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X.
Wogel, H.; P. A. Abrunhosa & J. P. Pombal JR. 2002. Atividade reprodutiva de Physalaemus signifer (Anura, Leptodactylidae) em ambientes temporários. Iheringia, série Zoologia. 92(2): 57-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212002000200006.
Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 123 p.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Biologia Neotropical / Journal of Neotropical Biology
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
La sumisión espontánea de trabajos automáticamente implica en la cesión integral de los derechos patrimoniales a la Revista de Biologia Neotropical / Journal of Neotropical Biology (RBN), después de la publicación. El autor concede a la RBN el derecho de la primera publicación de su articulo, licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Lo son garantizados a los autores los derechos autorales y morales de cada uno de los artículos publicados por la RBN, permitiéndoles:
1. El uso del artículo y de suyo contenido para el propósito de enseñanza y de investigación.
2. Divulgación del artículo y de suyo contenido, si lo hacer el link para el Artículo en sitio web de la RBN, permitiéndole la divulgación en:
- redes cerradas de instituciones (intranet).
- repositorios de acceso abierto.
3. Elaboración y divulgación de obras resultantes del artículo y de suyo contenido, si lo hacer la citación de la publicación original en la RBN.
4. Hacer copias impresas en pequeñas cantidades para uso personal.
