Dicotomia, complexidade e educação para a cidadania

Authors

  • Joel Haroldo Baade Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe – UNIARP
  • Laude Erandi Brandenburg Escola Superior de Teologia – EST
  • Juan Miguel González Velasco Universidad Mayor de San Andres

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rp.v31i1.66947

Abstract

Human life in the most different spheres, from social organization, through the development of sciences, reaching even fundamental elements of individual identities, was marked by a dichotomous paradigm, which produced a binary way of interpreting reality (right and wrong, rich and poor, east and west, north and south etc.). This text seeks to analyze the consequences of this binary thinking and the extent to which it produces social injustice, especially in the educational context, envisioning, in the complexity paradigm, an alternative for the construction of more citizen-like education and society. But it also searches for some possibilities of ruptures with these systems structured in and by the different social sectors, including education. Methodologically, the research can be characterized as of a basic nature in which the inductive method is used. The selection of sources and authors is arbitrary insofar as they were considered representative of the respective ideas developed. It is concluded that complex thinking offers an alternative to binary thinking at different educational levels, but its implementation in social practice is also a monumental challenge, since it presupposes the modification of behaviors deeply rooted in the culture and in the existential matrices of social agents. Thus, it is up to educational institutions to break with this dichotomy through an educational project aimed at full citizenship as an exercise of social justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-08

How to Cite

BAADE, J. H. .; ERANDI BRANDENBURG, L. .; GONZÁLEZ VELASCO, J. M. . Dicotomia, complexidade e educação para a cidadania. Revista Polyphonía, Goiânia, v. 31, n. 1, p. 85–103, 2020. DOI: 10.5216/rp.v31i1.66947. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/sv/article/view/66947. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2025.

Issue

Section

Dossiê Escola, Complexidade e Justiça Social