Cytogenetics of small mammals from bone marrow extraction: a more detailed description of the in vivo technique with adjustments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rbn.v20iesp.77169

Keywords:

cytotaxonomy, karyotype, rodents, marsupials, protocol

Abstract

Cytogenetics is an effective tool for identifying species and solving taxonomic problems in small mammals. In vivo protocols are useful due to their low cost, but they present methodological divergence and need to be frequently adjusted. In this study, we present a standardized method for the cytogenetic analysis of small mammals from femoral bone marrow extraction, and demonstrate the importance of this standardization in contrast to other approaches.  We applied the technique of Ford and Hamerton (1956)  with the following updates: 1) adjustment of the quantities and concentrations of solutions used (colchicine and hypotonic solution); 2) detailed description of the steps; 3) use of centrifugation as a separation method; 4) addition of a slide mounting procedure, which improves visualization of metaphases. Six cytogenetic protocols using bone marrow were compared in important stages of the sample preparation phase.  There were differences in the concentration of colchicine solutions between all the methods. The action time of the solution also varied (from 15 minutes to 6 hours). The time and concentration of the colchicine solutions are crucial stages for chromosome condensation and the generation of good metaphases. In this way, we highlight that the methodology presented in our study contributes to the standardization of an in vivo cytogenetic protocol suitable for small mammals, which makes it possible to use the material and reduce the number of animals sacrificed for methodology adjustments, resulting in viable samples from the very first attempts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonvicino, C. R.; A. R. E. A. N. De Menezes & J. A. Oliveira. 2003. Molecular and karyologic variation in the genus Isothrix (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Hereditas. 139: 206-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2003.01807.x

Bonvicino, C. R. & L. Geise. 1995. Taxonomic status of Delomys dorsalis collinus Thomas, 1917 (Rodentia, Cricetidae) and description of a new karyotype. Zei. für Säu. 60: 124-127. Disponível em: < https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45525765#page/138/mode/1up>. Acesso em 30 ago. 2023.

Brandão, M. V., A. P. Carmignotto, A. R. Percequillo, A. U. Christoff, A. C. Mendes-Oliveira & L. Geise. 2022. A new species of Akodon Meyen, 1833 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from dry forests of the Amazonia-Cerrado transition. Zootaxa. 5205(5): 401-435. DOI: https://doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5205.5.1.

Breen, M. 2015. Comparative Cytogenetics. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005801

Deakin J. E. 2018. Chromosome Evolution in Marsupials. Genes (Basel). 9(2): 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9020072

Di-Nizo, C. B., K. R. da Silva Banci, Y. Sato-Kuwabara & M. J. D. J. Silva. 2017. Advances in cytogenetics of Brazilian rodents: cytotaxonomy, chromosome evolution and new karyotypic data. Comp. cytog. 11(4): 833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.19925

Dobigny, G., V. Aniskin & V. Volobouev. 2002. Explosive chromosome evolution and speciation in the gerbil genus Taterillus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae): a case of two new criptic species. Cytog. and Gen. Res. 96: 117-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000063044

Dobigny, G. & F. F. Yang. 2008. Comparative cytogenetics in the genomics era: cytogenomics comes of age. Chrom. Res. 16(1): 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-1213-y

Favoretto, S. M., D. I. Seabra & M. C. M. Olivato. 2019. Guia de eutanásia para animais de ensino e pesquisa. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Disponível em: <https://ceua.unifesp.br/images/documentos/CEUA/Guia_Eutanasia_UNIFESP_versao_final_042019.pdf>. Acesso em 08 dez. 2023.

Ferguson-Smith M. A. & V. Trifonov. 2007. Mammalian karyotype evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 8(12): 950-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2199

Ferguson-Smith, M. A. 2015. History and evolution of cytogenetics. Mol Cytog. 8: 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-015-0125-8

Ford, C. E. & J. L. Hamerton. 1956. A colchicine, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain tech. 31(6): 247-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10520295609113814

Geise, L. 2014. Procedimentos genéticos iniciais na captura e preparação de mamíferos. pp. 221-235. In: Peracchi, A. L., B. K. Rossaneis, N. R. dos Reis & M. N. Fregonezi (Eds.). Técnicas de estudos aplicadas aos mamíferos silvestres brasileiros. Rio de Janeiro, Technical Books Editora.

Gentile, R., D. Loretto, M. Kajin, S. R. Freitas, R. Finotti, M. V. Vieira & R. Cerqueira. 2023. Garrafão Project: Origin, history and main aspects of the development of the largest long-term study of ecology of small mammals in Brazil. Oec. Aust. 27(2): 106-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2023.2702.01

Guerra, M. & M. D. Souza. 2002. Como observar cromossomos: um guia de técnicas em citogenética vegetal, animal e humana. Ribeirão Preto, FUNPEC, 201. Disponível em: <http://www.ensp.fiocruz.br/portal-ensp/_uploads/documentos-pessoais/documento-pessoal_52172.pdf>. Acesso em 30 ago. 2023.

Goodpasture, C. & S. E. Bloom. 1975. Visualization of nucleolar organizer regions in mammalian chromosomes using silver staining. Chromosoma. 53: 37-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329389

Graphodatsky, A. S., V. A. Trifonov & R. Stanyon. 2011. The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals. Mol Cyt. 4: 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-4-22

Kasahara, S. 2009. Introdução à pesquisa em citogenética de vertebrados. Ribeirão Preto, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, 160.

Nagamachi, C. Y., F. Eliana, J. C. Pieczarka, A. L. Pereira, C. E. F. Silva, C. C. Rosa, E. M. S. S. Souza, J. A. Pinto, M. J. R. Costa, S. M. Malcher, V. D. S. Paixão & W. O. Silva. 2015. Citogenética de pequenos mamíferos não-voadores da Amazônia Brasileira. pp. 275-307. In: Mendes-Oliveira, A. C. & C. L. Miranda (Eds.). Pequenos mamíferos não-voadores da Amazônia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia.

Oliveira, A. C. M. & C. L. Miranda. 2015. Pequenos mamíferos não-voadores da Amazônia brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, 336 p. Disponível em: < https://www.sbmz.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pequenos-mamiferos-não-voadores-da-amazonia-Brasileita.pdf>. Acesso em 30 de ago. 2023.

Pardue, M. L. & J. G. Gall. 1969. Molecular hybridization of radioactive DNA to the DNA of cytological preparations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 64(2): 600-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.64.2.600

Patton, J. L. 1967. Chromosome studies of certain pocket mice, genus Perognathus (Rodentia: heteromyidae). J. Mammal. 48(1): 27-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1378167

Patton, J. L. 2004. Comparative genomics and the role of chromosomal rearrangements in species divergence: a paradigm revisited. Masto. Neot. 11(2): 147-150. Disponível em: < http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?>script=sci_arttext&pid=S0327-93832004000200001>. Acesso em 30 ago. 2023.

Pinkel D., T. Straume & J. W. Gray. 1986. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc. of the Nat. Aca. of Sci. 83(9): 2934-2938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.9.2934

Potter, S. & J. E. Deakin. 2018. Cytogenetics: An important inclusion in the conservation genetics toolbox. Pac. Cons. Bio. 24(3): 280-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18016

Romanenko S. A., P. L. Perelman, V. A. Trifonov & A. S. Graphodatsky. 2012. Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia. Heredity. 108: 4-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2011.110

Sharman, G. B. 1974. Marsupial taxonomy and phylogeny. Aust. Mamm. 1(2): 137-154.

Hayman, D. L. 1989. Marsupial Cytogenetics. Aust. Jour. of Zoo. 37: 331-349. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1071/ZO9890331

Sikes, R. S. 2016. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. Journ. of Mamm. 97(3): 663-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw078

Silva, M. J. de J. 1994. Estudos cromossômicos e de complexos sinaptonêmicos em roedores brasileiros da tribo Oryzomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae) (Dissertação Mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo). Disponível em: <https://repositorio.usp.br/item/000740181>. Acesso em 30 ago. 2023.

Silva C. E. F. E., R. A. de Andrade, E. M. S. de Souza, E. S. Eler, M. N. F. da Silva & E. Feldberg. 2017. Comparative cytogenetics of some marsupial species (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) from the Amazon basin. Comp Cytogenet. 11(4): 703-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.13962

Viegas-Pequignot, E., B. Dutrillaux, H. Magdelenat & M. Coppey-Moisan. 1989. Mapping of single-copy DNA sequences on human chromosomes by in situ hybridization with biotinylated probes: enhancement of detection sensitivity by intensified-fluorescence digital-imaging microscopy. Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci. 86(2): 582-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.2.582

Weksler, M. & C. R. Bonvicino. 2005. Taxonomy of pigmy rice rats genus Oligoryzomys Bangs, 1900 (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) of the brazilian cerrado. 1900: 21045. Disponível em: < https://www.academia.edu/13242978/Taxonomy_of_pigmy_rice_rats_genus_Oligoryzomys_Bangs_1900_Rodentia_Sigmodontinae_of_the_Brazilian_Cerrado_with_the_description_of_two_new_species>. Acesso em 30 ago. 2023.

Published

2024-01-13

How to Cite

BERNARDES DIAS, A. C.; FONTOURA, C. P.; GONÇALVES, P. R.; SILVA, C. A. O.; MENDONÇA, M. A. C.; HANNIBAL, W. Cytogenetics of small mammals from bone marrow extraction: a more detailed description of the in vivo technique with adjustments. Revista de Biologia Neotropical / Journal of Neotropical Biology, Goiânia, v. 20, n. esp, p. 98–107, 2024. DOI: 10.5216/rbn.v20iesp.77169. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/RBN/article/view/77169. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.