Effects of assisted calving on reproductive efficiency in dairy cows without retained placenta
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of assisted calving on the occurrence of retained placenta (RP) and reproductive efficiency, as well as the effects of assisted calving on the reproductive efficiency of dairy cows without RP. Calvings were classified as normal (single live calf), assisted (human intervention required, single live calf), abortion, stillbirth, or twin. The interval from calving to first artificial insemination (AI), conception rate at first AI, and days open were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance and chi-square tests with R Core Team software. In total, 6,808 calvings were analyzed: 85.56 % normal, 4.36 % assisted, 4.77 % abortions, 3.44 % stillbirths, and 1.87 % twin calvings. Calving type affected the occurrence of RP (P = 0.0001). Cows with assisted calving had longer days open (151.00 ± 101.70 days; P = 0.004) than did cows with normal calving (124.08 ± 87.56 days), as well as a tendency toward a longer interval from calving to first AI (P = 0.093). A subgroup of 2,422 cows without RP was analyzed. Cows with assisted calving and without RP had longer days open (144.00 ± 102.60 days; P = 0.035) than did cows with normal calving (123.23 ± 87.18 days). No effect of assisted calving was detected on the interval from calving to first AI or on conception rate at first AI. It is concluded that assisted calving is associated with a higher incidence of RP, and that calving assistance negatively affects the reproductive efficiency of dairy cows, regardless of RP occurrence.
Keywords: cattle; reproductive performance; dystocia; days open.
Downloads
References
1. LeBlanc SJ. Is a high level of milk production compatible with good reproductive performance in dairy cows? Anim Frontiers. 2013;3(4):84–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2013-0038
2. Overton MW, Eicker S. Associations between days open and dry period length versus milk production, replacement, and fertility in the subsequent lactation in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2025;108(4):3764–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-26055
3. Mee JF. Prevalence and risk factors for dystocia in dairy cattle: A review. Vet J. 2008;176(1):93–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.032
4. Sheldon IM, Cronin J, Goetze L, Donofrio G, Schuberth HJ. Defining postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(6):1025–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.077370
5. Rajala PJ, Gröhn YT. Effects of Dystocia, Retained Placenta, and Metritis on Milk Yield in Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81(12):3172–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75883-7
6. Kamel ER, Ahmed H, Hassan FM. The effect of retained placenta on the reproductive performance and its economic losses in a Holstein dairy herd. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2022;36(2):359–65. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2021.130287.1791
7. Campos CC, do Prado FL, dos Reis JPJ, Carneiro LC, Silva PRB, de Moraes GF, et al. Effects of clinical mastitis and puerperal diseases on reproductive efficiency of dairy cows. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020;52(6):3061–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02326-2
8. Buso RR, Campos CC, Santos TR, Saut JPE, Santos RM. Retained placenta and subclinical endometritis: Prevalence and relation with reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows. Pesq Vet Bras. 2018;38(1):1–5. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-0122
9. Sheldon IM, Williams EJ, Miller ANA, Nash DM, Herath S. Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition. Vet J. 2008;176(1):115–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.031
10. Mahnani A, Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi A, Ansari-Mahyari S, Ghorbani GR. Assessing the consequences and economic impact of retained placenta in Holstein dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 2021;175:61–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.08.036
11. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2021. 502.
12. Lombard JE, Garry FB, Tomlinson SM, Garber LP. Impacts of dystocia on health and survival of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:1751-60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-295
13. Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci. 1989;72(1):68–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0
14. Biase GM, Ferreira DF. Comparações múltiplas e testes simultâneos para parâmetros binomiais de K populações independentes. Rev Bras Biom. 2009;27(3):301–323.
15. R Core Team (2025). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
16. Echternkamp SE, Thallman RM, Cushman RA, Allan MF, Gregory KE. Increased calf production in cattle selected for twin ovulations. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(12):3239–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0210
17. Fourichon C, Seegers H, Malher X. Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: a meta-analysis. Theriogenology. 2000;53(9), 1729–1759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00311-3
18. Vieira de Rezende E, Cristian Campos C, Maria dos Santos R. Incidence of Retained Placenta and the Consequences on Milk Production and Reproductive Efficiency of Holstein Cows. Acta Scientiae Vet. 2013;41: 1170.
19. Bicalho RC, Galvão KN, Cheong SH, Gilbert RO, Warnick LD, Guard CL. Effect of stillbirths on dam survival and reproduction performance in holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(6):2797–803. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-504
20. Coury LFF, Campos CC, de Moraes GF, Reis NS, dos Santos RM. Effect of assisted calving on uterine puerperal disorders occurrence, and on reproductive efficiency in crossbred dairy cows. Cienc Anim Bras. 2023;24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v24e-75064E
21. Schuenemann GM, Nieto I, Bas S, Galvão KN, Workman J. Assessment of calving progress and reference times for obstetric intervention during dystocia in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(11):5494–501. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4436
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Data statement
-
The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript























