Fermentation profile, nutritional value and aerobic stability of mixed elephant grass and butterfly pea silages

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v25e-76994E

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the effect of butterfly pea inclusion on the fermentation dynamics,
nutritional quality and aerobic stability of mixed elephant grass silages. Butterfly pea levels (0, 20, 40,
60 and 80% on a natural matter basis) were added to elephant grass silages. A completely randomized
design was adopted, with 5 treatments and 3 replications, totaling 15 experimental silos, which
were opened after 30 days of fermentation. The inclusion of butterfly pea in elephant grass silages
resulted in a quadratic effect for permeability, density, maximum pH, final pH, time to reach maximum
temperature and aerobic stability (P<0.05). Butterfly pea inclusion levels increased dry matter recovery,
pH, dry matter, organic matter, ether extract, crude protein and total digestible nutrients (P<0.001)
and reduced gas and effluent losses, mineral matter, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber,
hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and total carbohydrates (P<0.001). Inclusions of 40, 60 and 80% of
butterfly pea provided temperature increases at 10, 20, 30 and 40 hours. The inclusion of butterfly pea
with levels of up to 80% reduces fermentation losses, allows for a nutritional increase and increase in
aerobic stability of silages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amaral RC, Carvalho BF, Costa DM, Morenz MJF, Schwan RF, Ávila CLS. Novel lactic acid bacteria strains enhance the conservation of elephant grass silage cv. BRS Capiaçu. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn. 2020;264:e114472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114472

Araújo JS, Araújo CA, Macedo A, Silva CS, Novaes JJS, Lima DO, Borges EN, Gois GC, Araújo GGL, Campos FS. Fermentation dynamics, nutritional quality, and heating capacity of mixed silages of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) and leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala). Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2022;59:e189466. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2022.189466

Bezerra HFC, Santos EM, Oliveira JS, Carvalho GGP, Pinho RMA, Silva TC, Pereira GA, Cassuce MR, Zanine AM. Fermentation characteristics and chemical composition of elephant grass silage with ground maize and fermented juice of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2019;49(3):522-533. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i3.13

Matias AGS, Araujo GGL, Campos FS, Moraes SA, Gois GC, Silva TS, Emerenciano Neto JV, Voltolini TV. Fermentation profile and nutritional quality of silages composed of cactus pear and maniçoba for goat feeding. J. Agric. Sci. 2020;158(1):304–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000581

Zanine AM, Sene OA, Ferreira DJ, Parente HN, Parente MOM, Pinho RMA, Santos EM, Nascimento TVC, Lima AGVO, Perazzo AF, Portela YN, Bandeira DM. Fermentative profile, losses and chemical composition of silage soybean genotypes amended with sugarcane levels. Sci. Rep. 2020; 10:e21064. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78217-1

Macêdo AJS, Neto JMC, Silva MA, Santos EM. Potencialidades e limitações de plantas forrageiras para ensilagem: Revisão de Literatura. Rev. Bras. Hig. Sanid. Anim. 2021;13(1):320-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1981-2965.20210010

Machado HC, Campos NM, Santos CAP. Análise do desenvolvimento e da produção da cunhã em função de diferentes tipos de adubação orgânica. Ci. Agríc. 2021;19(1):25-36. https://doi.org/10.28998/rca.v19i1.10265

Lemos MF, Mello ACL, Guim A, Cunha MV, Silva PHF, Atroch TMA, Simões Neto DE, Oliveira Neto PM, Medeiros AS, Clemente JVF. Grass size and butterfly pea inclusion modify the nutritional value of elephant grass silage. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2021;56:e02409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02409.

Multisona RR, Shirodkar S, Arnold M, Gramza-Michalowska A. Clitoria ternatea flower and its bioactive compounds: potential use as microencapsulated ingredient for functional foods. Appl. Sci. 2023;13:e2134. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13042134

Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Met. Zeitschrift. 2013;22(1):711-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

Atalay H, Bilal T, Ekiz B. The effect of physically effective neutral detergent fiber on milk composition and milk yield. Etlik Vet. Mikrob. Derg. 2021;32(2):140-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.35864/evmd.1015773

Jobim CC, Nussio LG, Reis RA, Schmidt P. 2007. Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da forragem conservada. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 36:101–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007001000013

Williams AG. The permeability and porosity of grass silage as affected by dry matter. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1994; 59(2):133-140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1994.1070

Aoac. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis, 20th ed. Washington, D.C.: Latimer Jr., G.W.; 2016. 3172p.

Mizubuti IY, Pinto AP, Pereira ES, Ramos BMO. Métodos laboratoriais de avaliação de alimentos para animais, 1st ed. Londrina, PR: Eduel; 2009. 228p.

Kung Junior L. Microbial and chemical additives for silage: effect on fermentation and a animal response. Proceedings of the II Workshop Sobre Milho Para Silagem, Piracicaba, Brazil, July 2000. p. 1–53.

Araújo CA, Santos APM, Monteiro CCF, Lima DO, Torres AM, Santos CVS, Silva JJ. Efeito do tempo de ensilagem sobre a composição química, perfil fermentativo e estabilidade aeróbia de silagens de milho (Zea mays). Div. J. 2020;5(1):547-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.17648/diversitas-journal-v5i1-1035.

Tao X, Ji C, Chen S, Zhao J, Wang S, Li J, Sun F, Shao T. Fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Napier grass ensiled with citric acid residue and lactic acid bacteria. Trop. Grassl. Forrajes Trop. 2021;9(1):52-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.17138/tgft(9)52-59.

Aocs. American Oil Chemists' Society. Official methods and recommended practices, 7th ed. Urbana, IL; 2017.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583-3597. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Sniffen CJ, O'Connor JD, Van Soest PJ, Fox DG, Russell JB. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 1992;70(11):3562-3577. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x

Hall MB. Challenges with non-fiber carbohydrate methods. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81(12):3226-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123226x. PMid:14677880

Undersander D, Mertens DR, Thiex N. Forage analysis procedures. Omaha: National Forage Testing Associaton, 1993. 154 p.

Dias ECB, Cândido MJD, Furtado RN, Pompeu RCFF, Silva LV. Nutritive value of elephant grass silage added with cottonseed cake in diet for sheep. Rev. Ci. Agron. 2019;50(2):321-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20190038.

Carvalho IQ, Jobim CC, Osmari MP, Daniel JLP. Occurrence of visible losses and relationship with corn silage management in dairy farms in the State of Paraná. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2021;43:e49933. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v43i1.49933

Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):3952–3979 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13837

Almeida BAS, Teixeira FA, Nunes TSS, Gois GC, Reis LO, Ferreira Filho PA, Ramos RJN, Rodrigues AC, Menezes DR, Silva AM, Silva SFA, Queiroz MAA. Fermentative dynamics and nutritional characteristics of mixed corn silages with and without cobs associated with butterfly pea hay. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 2023;66:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2023.2233456

Randby AT, Halvorsen HN, Bakken AK. Losses and grass silage quality in bunker silos compacted by tractor versus wheel loader. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn. 2020;266:e114523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114523

Costa ER, Mello ACL, Guim A, Costa SBM, Abreu BS, Silva PHF, Silva VJ, Simões Neto D. Adding corn meal into mixed elephant grass–butterfly pea legume silages improves nutritive value and dry matter recovery. J. Agric. Sci. 2022;160:185-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859622000284

Ren X, Tian H, Zhao K, Li D, Xiao Z, Yu Y, Liu F. Research on pH value detection method during maize silage secondary fermentation based on computer vision. Agric. 2022;12:e1623. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101623

Şenyüz Η, Karsli Μ. Digestibility and silage quality of potato pulp silages prepared with different feedstuff. J. Hellenic Vet. Med. Soc. 2022;72:3383–3390. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.29381

Dong Z, Li J, Wang S, Dong D, Shao T. Time of day for harvest affects the fermentation parameters, bacterial community, and metabolic characteristics of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid silage. mSphere. 2022;31:e0016822. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00168-22

Kung Jr L, Savage RM, Silva EB, Polukis SA, Smith ML, Johnson ACB, Miller MA. The effects of air stress during storage and low packing density on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri 40788. J. Dairy Sci. 2021;104(4):4206–4222. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19746

Li YF, Wang LL, Jeong EC, Kim HJ, Ahmadi F, Jong Geun Kim JG. Effects of sodium diacetate or microbial inoculants on aerobic stability of wilted rye silage. Anim. Biosci. 2022;35(12):1871-1880. http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0150

Nascimento RR, Edvan RL, Nascimento KS, Barros LS, Bezerra LR, Miranda RS, Perazzo AF, Araújo MJ. Quality of silage with different mixtures of melon biomass with urea as an additive. Agron. 2023;13:e293. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020293

Camilo MG, Fernandes AM, Processi EF, Motta OV, Roseira JPS, Oliveira TS. Evaluation of the type of silo associated or not with additives on the nutritional value, aerobic stability, and microbiology of pearl millet silage. An. Acad. Bras. Ci. 2023;95:e20210421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202320210421

McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow: Chalcomb Publishing. 1991; 340p.

Araújo, CA, Novaes JJS, Araújo JS, de Macedo A, Silva CS, Silva TC, Emerenciano Neto J, Araújo GGL, Campos FS, Gois GC. Perfil fermentativo, calidad nutricional y estabilidad aerobia de ensilajes mezclados de hierba elefante (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) y maní forrajero (Arachis pintoi). Rev. MVZ Córdoba. 2022;27(3):e2549. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2549

Marques KO, Jakelaitis A, Guimarães KC, Pereira LS. Perfil agronômico, fermentativo e bromatológico da silagem obtida do consórcio entre milho e soja. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021;10(1): e41410111925. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11925

Rodrigues WM, Sales ECJ, Monção FP, Marques OFC, Rigueira JPS, Pires DAA, Rufino LDA, Rocha Junior VR, Alves DD, Gomes, VM. J. Dev. 2020;6(4):22001-22017. http://dx.doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n4-389

Amorim DS, Edvan RL, Nascimento RR, Bezerra LR, Araújo MJ, Silva AL, Mielezrski F, Nascimento KS. Fermentation profile and nutritional value of sesame silage compared to usual silages. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 2020;19(1):230-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1724523.

Nascimento KS, Edvan RL, Vallecillo SJA, Nascimento RR, Barros DMA, Silva MA, Araújo MJ, Bezerra LR. Can fermentative and nutritional quality of Panicum maximum silage be improved with the use of corn silage juice as a bioinoculant? Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2021;26(3): 411-419. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1850

Borges EN, Araújo CA, Monteiro BS, Silva AS, Albuquerque LF, Araújo GGL, Campos FS, Gois GC, Souza RC, Araújo AO. Buffel grass pre-dried as a modulator of the fermentation, nutritional andaerobic stability profile of cactus pear silage. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 2023;66:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2023.2212173

Carrillo-Díaz MI, Miranda-Romero LA, Chávez-Aguilar G, Zepeda-Batista JL, González-Reyes M, García-Casillas AC, Tirado-González DN, Tirado-Estrada G. Improvement of ruminal neutral detergent fiber degradability by obtaining and using exogenous fibrolytic enzymes from white-rot fungi. Anim. 2022;12:e843. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12070843.

Hawu O, Ravhuhali KE, Mokoboki HK, Lebopa CK, Sipango N. Sustainable Use of legume residues: effect on nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of maize straw silage. Sustain. 2022;14(11):e6743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116743

Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2th ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1994; 476p.

Gülümser E, Mut H, Başaran U, Doğrusöz MÇ. Na assessment of ensiling potential in maize x legume (soybean and cowpea) binary mixtures for yield and feeding quality. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2021;45(3):547-555. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2006-43

Souza WF, Costa KAP, Guarnieri A, Severiano EC, Silva JT, Teixeira DAA, Oliveira SS, Dias MBC. Production and quality of the silage of corn intercropped with Paiaguas palisadegrass in different forage systems and maturity stages. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2019;48: e20180222. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180222

Weimer PJ. Degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose by ruminal microorganisms. Microorg. 2022;10:e2345. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122345

Published

2024-03-11

How to Cite

SILVA, Crislane de Souza et al. Fermentation profile, nutritional value and aerobic stability of mixed elephant grass and butterfly pea silages. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 25, 2024. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v25e-76994E. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/76994. Acesso em: 10 feb. 2026.

Issue

Section

ANIMAL SCIENCE