Levels of digestible phosphorus for growing gilts
Abstract
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of digestible phosphorus levels in diets for growing gilts (30 to 50 kg), which have high potential for lean meat deposition, on the performance and characteristics of waste. Sixty gilts were used, with an initial weight of 29.99 ± 3.37 kg, distributed in a randomized block design with five levels of digestible phosphorus (0.219, 0.299, 0.319, 0.369, and 0.419 %), six replicates, and two animals per experimental unit. Phosphorus levels did not influence (P>0.05) final weight, total weight gain, daily weight gain, daily feed intake, total feed intake, crude protein consumption, digestible lysine consumption, metabolizable energy, and feed conversion. The daily intakes of digestible phosphorus and calcium increased linearly (P<0.01) with increasing levels of phosphorus and calcium in the diet. The dry matter, natural matter, residue coefficient, total solids, and total nitrogen of the manure were not influenced (P>0.05) by the phosphorus level. On the other hand, a linear increase (P<0.01) was observed for volatile solids and total phosphorus in swine manure as the digestible phosphorus level increased. The level of 0.219 % digestible phosphorus, corresponding to an intake of 3.67 g of daily digestible phosphorus, meets the nutritional requirements of phosphorus for growing gilts (30 to 50 kg) and allows for a reduction in phosphorus excretion in waste.
Keywords: manure; minerals; nutrition; nutritional requirements.
Downloads
References
1. Zhai H, Adeola O, Liu J. Phosphorus nutrition of growing pigs. Animal Nutrition. 2022; 9: 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2022.01.010
2. Becker SL, Gould SA, Petry AL, Kellesvig LM, Patience JF. Adverse effects on growth performance and bone development in nursery pigs fed diets marginally deficient in phosphorus with increasing calcium to available phosphorus ratios. Journal of Animal Sciences. 2020; 98(10): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa325
3. Kala A, Saxena A, Jadhav SE, Chaudhary LC, Chaudhary P, Thakur K, Verma AK. Feed resources, feeding principles, and nutrient requirements of pigs. Em: Commercial Pig Farming. Academic Press, 2025. p. 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-23769-0.00006-3
4. Vier CM, Dritz SS, Wu F, Tokach MD, DeRouchey JM, Goodband RD, Gonçalves MAD, Orlando UAD, Chitakasempornkul K, Woodworth JC. Standardized total tract digestible phosphorus requirement of 24-to 130-kg pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2019; 97(10): 4023-4031. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz256
5. Sobol M, Skiba G, Raj S, Kowalczyk P, Kramkowski K, Świątkiewicz M, Grela ER. Chemical body composition and bone growth of young pigs as affected by deficiency, adequate and excess of dietary phosphorus supply. Annals of Animal Science. 2022; 22(4): 1363-1372. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2022-0061
6. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, Gomes PC, Oliveira RD, Lopes DC, Ferreira AS, Barreto SLD. Tabelas brasileiras para suínos e aves: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 2nd ed. UFV-DZO, Viçosa, MG, Brasil, 2005. 186 p.
7. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, Gomes PC, Oliveira RD, Lopes DC, Ferreira SLTB, Euclides RF. Tabelas brasileiras para suínos e aves: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais 3rd ed. UFV-DZO, Viçosa, MG, Brasil, 2011. 252 p.
8. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Hannas MI, Donzele JL, Sakomura NK, Perazzo FG, Saraiva A, Abreu MLT, Rodrigues PB, Oliveira RD, Barreto SLD, Brito CO. Tabelas brasileiras para suínos e aves: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais 4rt ed. UFV-DZO, Viçosa- MG, Brasil, 2017. 488 p.
9. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Calderano AA, Hannas MI, Sakomura NK, Perazzo FG, Rocha GC, Saraiva A, Abreu MLT, Genova JL, Tavernari FC. Tabelas brasileiras para suínos e aves: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais 5rt ed. UFV-DZO, Viçosa- MG, Brasil, 2024. 531 p.
10. Buffington DE, Collazo-Arocho A, Canton GH, Pitt D, Thatcher WW, Collier RJ. Black globe-humidity index (BGHI) as comfort equation for dairy cows. Transactions of the ASAE. 1981; 24: 711-714. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34325
11. Rosa EM, Xavier CAN, Kiefer C, Arruda LDDO, Andrade WR, Sanches DDS, Santos TMBD. Caracterização e digestão anaeróbia dos dejetos de suínos submetidos a restrição alimentar ou suplementados com ractopamina ou cromo. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 2024; 25: 77719E. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v25e-77719P
12. APHA - American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. (23rd ed). American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation.Washington DC. 2017. 1504p.
13. Silva DJ. Queiroz AC. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. 3rd ed. Imprensa Universitária da UFV, Viçosa, MG. 2002.
14. SAS – Statistical Analysis System. Institute Inc. SAS language reference. Version 9.1.3. Cary NC: SAS Institute. 2009.
15. Schlegel P. Gutzwiller A. Dietary calcium to digestible phosphorus ratio for optimal growth performance and bone mineralization in growing and finishing pigs. Animals. 2020; 10(2): 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020178
16. Oster M, Gerlinger C, Heide K, Just F, Borgelt L, Wolf P, Polley, C, Vollmar, B, Muráni E, Ponsuksili S, Wimmers K. Lower dietary phosphorus supply in pigs match both animal welfare aspects and resource efficiency. Ambio. 2018; 47(Suppl. 1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0969-8
17. Bünzen S, Rostagno HS, Kiefer C, Teixeira ADO, Ribeiro Junior V. Digestible phosphorus levels for growing swine. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2012; 41(2): 320-325. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000200013
18. Araujo GA, Martins JS, Santos VT, Monteiro ANTR, Pozza PC. Growing pigs’ diets with increased phytase activity and reduced available phosphorus resulted in similar performance and environmental impacts. Animal-Open Space. 2023; 2: 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anopes.2023.100053
19. Drews JE, Haese D, Kill JL, Lorenzoni LL, Pimentel RB, Molino JP, Saraiva A, Possatti CDÁ. Phosphorus on performance, hematological, biochemical, and bone parameters of growing pigs. Ciência Rural. 2016; 46(6): 1076-1081. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150132
20. Suttle N. Mineral nutrition of livestock. GB: Cabi, 2022.
21. Misiura MM, Filipe JA, Walk CL, Kyriazakis I. How do pigs deal with dietary phosphorus deficiency? British Journal of Nutrition. 2020; 124(3): 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520000975
22. Saraiva A, Donzele JL, Oliveira RFMD, Abreu MLTD, Silva FCDO, Vianna RA, Lima AL. Available phosphorus levels in diets for 30 to 60 kg female pigs selected for meat deposition by maintaining calcium and available phosphorus ratio. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011; 40: 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000300017
23. Rodrigues VV, Cantarelli VDS, Amaral NDO, Zangeronimo MG, Brito JÁGD, Fialho ET. Nutrient reduction in rations with phytase for growing pigs. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011; 40: 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000200019
24. Nieto VMOS, Kiefer C, Nascimento KMRS, Gonçalves LMP, Bonin MN, Marçal DA, Abreu RC, Rodrigues GP. Níveis de fósforo digestível para suínos machos castrados dos 30 aos 50 kg. Archivos de zootecnia. 2017; 66(253): 23-28. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/495/49551221004.pdf
25. Saraiva A, Donzele JL, Oliveira RFMD, Abreu MLTD, Silva FCDO, Haese D. Available phosphorus levels in diets for swine with high genetic potential for meat deposition from 30 to 60 kg. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2009; 38: 1279-1285. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000700017
26. NRC – National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C, 2012.
27. Blas C, Gasa J, Mateos GG. Necesidades nutricionales para ganado porcino. Normas FEDNA. Madrid, 2013. 114 p.
28. Davoudi P, Do DN, Colombo SM, Rathgeber B, Miar Y. Application of genetic, genomic and biological pathways in improvement of swine feed efficiency. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022; 13: 903733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.903733
29. Just F, Oster M, Büsing K, Borgelt L, Murani E, Ponsuksili S, Wolf P, Wimmers K. Lowered dietary phosphorus affects intestinal and renal gene expression to maintain mineral homeostasis with immunomodulatory implications in weaned piglets. BMC genomics. 2018; 19: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4584-2
30. Mun HS, Rathnayake D, Dilawar MA, Jeong MG, Yang CJ. Effect of ambient temperature on growth performances, carcass traits and meat quality of pigs. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 2022; 50(1): 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2022.2032084
31. Chidgey KL. Space allowance for growing pigs: Animal welfare, performance and on-farm practicality. Animal. 2023; 18(Suppl. 1): 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100890
32. Orrico Junior MAP, Orrico ACA, Lucas Junior J. Animal production and environment: a comparison between potential of methane emission from waste and quantity of produced food. Engenharia Agrícola. 2011; 31(2): 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000200020
33. Carvalho KCN, Kiefer C, Nascimento KMRDS, Santos TMBD, Bonin MDN, Alencar SADS, Silva JL, Rodrigues GP. Nutritional plans of digestible phosphorus for gilts from 30 to 100 kg. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2019; 48:e20190116. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820190116
34. Miranda AP, Lucas Junior JD, Thomaz MC, Pereira GT, Fukayama EH. Anaerobic biodigestion of pigs feces in the initial, growing and finishing stages fed with diets formulated with corn or sorghum. Engenharia Agrícola. 2012; 32(1): 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162012000100006
35. Li Y, Wang M, Chen X, Cui S, Hofstra N, Kroeze C, Ma L, Xu W, Zhang Q, Zhang F, Strokal M. Multi-pollutant assessment of river pollution from livestock production worldwide. Water Research. 2022; 209: 117906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117906
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Data statement
-
The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript























