Nitrogen return in an integrated crop-livestock system with irrigation and forage legume

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v26e-81720E

Abstract

Expanding the use of different practices in integrated crop livestock system (ICLS) is essential to understanding the dynamics of nitrogen (N) return. This study evaluated the influence of legume and irrigation on nitrogen return in ICLS. The four treatments were: irrigated and non-irrigated x intercropped and not intercropped with legume, in a 2x2 factorial scheme in randomized blocks experimental design with three replications. The ICLS area was cultivated, in winter, with pasture of black oat (Avena strigosa) and ryegrass (Lolium multiflorium) overseeded in african star (Cynodon sp.), and vetch (Vicia sativa) in the intercropped paddocks, with rotational grazing method. And, in summer, with corn (Zea mays). Data were subjected to analysis of variance (F test, p<0.05). There were no significant effects of irrigation and legumes on the return of N through feces, urine, and pasture residues. Grain yield, straw, extraction, export, and return of N by corn were similar among treatments. The average total N return was 335.61 kg ha-1. Irrigation and intercropping with legumes did not influence N return in ICLS, after one-year evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carvalho PCF, Souza ED, Denardin LGO, Kunrath TR, Machado DR, Souza Filho W, Martins AP, Tiecher T. Reconnecting nature and agricultural production: mixed cropping systems as a way forward sustainable intensification. Boletim de Indústria Animal. 2021; 78. http://dx.doi.org/10.17523/bia.2021.v78.e11496

Franzluebbers AJ, Hendrickson JR. Should we consider integrated crop–livestock systems for ecosystem services, carbon sequestration, and agricultural resilience to climate change? Agronomy Journal. 2024; 116: 415–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21520

Szymczak LS, Carvalho PCF, Lurette A, Moraes A, Nunes PAA, Martins AP, Moulin CH. System diversification and grazing management as resilience-enhancing agricultural practices: The case of crop-livestock integration. Agricultural Systems. 2020, 184. 102904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102904

Nunes PAA, Laca EA, Carvalho PCF, Souza Filho W, Kunrath TR, Martins AP, Gaudin A. Livestock integration into soybean systems improves long‑term system stability and profits without compromising crop yields. Scientific reports. 2021,11, 1649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81270-z

Iteba JO, Hein T, Singer GA, Masese FO. Livestock as vectors of organic matter and nutrient loading in aquatic ecosystems in African savannas. PLoS ONE. 2021, 16. e0257076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257076

Assmann TS, Soares AB, Assmann AL, Huf FI, Lima RCD. Adubação de sistemas em integração lavoura-pecuária. In: Jahmour J, Assmann TS (Orgs.). I Congresso Brasileiro de Sistemas Integrados de Produção Agropecuária e IV Encontro de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária no Sul do Brasil. Pato Branco: UTFPR Câmpus Pato Branco, 2017. p. 67-84.

Sanches AC, Gomes EP, Rickli ME, Fasolin JP, Soares MRC, Goes RHTB. Produtividade e valor nutritivo do capim Tifton 85 irrigado e sobressemeado com aveia. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2015, 19. 126-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n2p126-133

Sah RP, Chakraborty M, Prasad K, Pandit M, Tudu VK, Chakravarty MK, Narayan SC, Rana M, Moharana D. Impact of water deficit stress in maize: Phenology and yield components. Scientific reports. 2020, 10. 2944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59689-7

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - EMBRAPA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5.ed. Brasília (DF): Embrapa; 2018. 355p.

Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrif. 2013, 22. 711–728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

Euclides VPB, Macedo MCM, Oliveira MP. Avaliação de diferentes métodos de amostragem [para se estimar o valor nutritivo de forragens sob pastejo]. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 1992, 21. 691-702.

Tilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 1963, 18. 104-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Myazawa M, Pavan MM, Muraoka T, Carmo CAFS, Melo WJ. Análise química de tecido vegetal. In: Silva FC (Ed.). Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. 2.ed. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2009. p.199-233.

Myers WD, Ludden PA, Nayigihugu V, Hess BW. Technical Note: A procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. Journal Of Animal Science. 2004,82. 179-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2004.821179x.

Chizzotti ML, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Chizzotti FHM, Tedeschi LO. Determination of creatinine excretion and evaluation of spot urine sampling in Holstein cattle. Livestock Science. 2008, 113. 218-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.03.013

Raza A, Zahra N, Hafeez, MB, Ahmad M, Iqbal S, Shaukat K, Ahmad G. Nitrogen fixation of legumes: Biology and Physiology. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Araújo S, Gill S. (Eds). The Plant Family Fabaceae: Biology and Physiological Responses to Environmental Stresses. Springer; p.43-74, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4752-2_3

Farias Filho JÁ, Moraes PVD, Artuso VA, Chiavon JAD, Silva DW, Kunz AG, Zanini WR. Competitive effect between bristle oat (Avena strigosa) and common vetch (Vicia sativa) plants in consortium under diverse populational densities. Journal of Agronomy. 2016,15. 184-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ja.2016.184.190

Koenig KM, Beauchemin KA. Nitrogen metabolism and route of excretion in beef feedlot cattle fed barley-based backgrounding diets varying in protein concentration and rumen degradability1,2. Journal of Animal Science. 2013, 91. 2295–2309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5652

Angelidis A, Crompton L, Misselbrook T, Yan T, Reynolds CK, Stergiadis S. Evaluation and prediction of nitrogen use efficiency and outputs in faeces and urine in beef cattle. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2019, 280. 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.013

Garcia L, Dubeux JR JCB, Sollenberger LE, Vendramini JMB, Dilorenzo N, Santos ERS, Jaramillo DM, Moreno MR. Nutrient excretion from cattle grazing nitrogen‐fertilized grass or grass–legume pastures. Agronomy Journal. 2021, 113. 3110-3123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20675

Selbie DR, Buckthought LE, Shepherd M.A. The challenge of the urine patch for managing nitrogen in grazed pasture systems. Advances in Agronomy. 2015, 129. 229-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.09.004

Chadwick DR, Cardenas LM, Dhanoa MS, Donovan N, Misselbrook T, Williams JR, Thorman RE, McGeough KL, Watson CJ, Bell M, Anthony SG, Rees RM. The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: Quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories. Science of The Total Environment. 2018, 635. 607–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.152

Lessa ACR, Madari BE, Paredes DS, Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Jantalia CP, Alves BJR. Bovine urine and dung deposited on Brazilian savannah pastures contribute differently to direct and indirect soil nitrous oxide emissions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2014,190. 104-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.010

Gao J, Luo J, Lindsey S, Shi Y, Wei Z, Wang L, Zhang L. Effects of boric acid on urea-N transformation and 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate efficiency. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2021, 6. 1091-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10719

Simon PL, Klein CAM, Zanatta JA, Van der Weerden TJ, Ramalho B, Bayer C. Nitrous oxide emission factors from cattle urine and dung, and dicyandiamide (DCD) as a mitigation strategy in subtropical pastures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2018, 267. 74–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.08.013

Ledgard, SF.; Steele, KW. Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume/grass pastures. Plant and soil, v. 141, p. 137-153, 1992.

Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS). Fertilidade do Solo: manual de adubação e de calagem para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. 10.ed. Porto Alegre: Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo, 2004.

Kakraliya SK, Singh U, Bohra A, Choudhary KK, Kumar S, Meena RS, Jat ML. Nitrogen and legumes: a meta-analysis. In: Meena R, Das A, Yadav G, Lal R. (Eds). Legumes for soil health and sustainable management, Springer, p. 277-314, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4_9

Published

2025-08-13

How to Cite

FILHO , João de Assis Farias; SARTOR , Laércio Ricardo; AMADORI, Caroline; DANNA , Mirella; MENEZES , Luís Fernando Glasenapp de. Nitrogen return in an integrated crop-livestock system with irrigation and forage legume. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 26, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v26e-81720E. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/81720. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

Issue

Section

ANIMAL SCIENCE

Data statement

  • The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript