Relative bioeffectiveness of hydroxy calcium salt analogous methionine compared to DL-methionine on the performance of light laying hens in the production phase

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v26e-81118E

Abstract

Abstract: The study evaluated the relative bioefficacy of HMBA-Ca compared to DLM at digestible Met+Cys levels for lightweight laying hens from 42 to 62 weeks of age on performance, egg quality, feather score condition, and economic assessment. A total of 1,080 Hy-Line W80 hens were allocated to nine treatments in a completely randomized design with a 2×4+1 factorial arrangement (2 sources, 4 levels of digestible methionine+cystine supplementation: 0.46, 0.54, 0.56, and 0.58 %, plus 1 unsupplemented group). Both sources met the nutritional requirements, with DLM being more efficient at levels close to the minimum requirement, favoring egg weight, whereas HMBA-Ca showed better performance at higher levels, with a greater yolk percentage and improved feather score. Eggshell quality was not compromised, even with the increase in egg size. The economic analysis indicated the lowest cost per dozen at intermediate levels (0.50–0.54 %), but HMBA-Ca at 0.58 % resulted in the highest net margin (103 %) and return per dollar invested, maintaining an advantage even under simulated scenarios of exchange rate variation. It is concluded that, although both sources are effective, supplementation with HMBA-Ca at 0.58 % represents the most advantageous strategy by combining productive performance, feather quality, and greater profitability under favorable market conditions.
Key-words: economic index; egg production; plumage score; sulfur amino acids.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Marcelline SP, Toghyani M, Chrystal PV, Selle PH, Liu SY. Amino acid requirements for laying hens: a comprehensive review. Poultry Scince. 2021; 100:101036. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101036

Guangtian MA, Habtamu A, Tahir, M, Yves M, Jing W, Jing L, Shugeng W, Kai Q, Haijun Z. Methionine and vitamin E supplementation improve production performance, antioxidante potential, and liver health in aged laying hens. Poultry Science. 2024; 103: 104415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104415

Zhou H, Yuan Z, Chen D, Wang H, Shu Y, Gao J, Htoo JK, Yu B. Bioavailability of the dl-methionine and the calcium salt of dl-methionine hydroxy analog compared with l-methionine for nitrogen retention in starter pigs. J Anim Sci. 2021. 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab151

Vázquez-Añón M, Bertin G, Mercier Y, Reznik G, Roberton JL. Review of the chemistry, metabolism, and dose response of two supplemental methionine sources and the implications in their relative bioefficacy. Poultry Science Journal. 2017; 73: 725-736. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000551

Fickler J, Heimbeck W, Hess V, Reimann I, Reising J, Wiltafsky M, Zimmer U. AMINO Dat 5.0. Animal Nutritionist’s Information Edge. 2016. July 09. https://www.academia.edu/38777571/AMINODat_5.0_-_The_animal_nutritionists_information_edge

Card LE, Nesheim, MC. Producción Avícola. Zaragoza: Acribia. 1968.

Hamilton RMG. “Methods and factors that affect the measurement of egg shell quality”. Poultry Science. 1982; 61: 2022-2039. https://doi.org/doi:10.3382/ps.0612022

Tauson R, Kjaer J, Maria GA, Cepero R, Holm K. Applied scoring of integument and health in laying hens. Applied Scoring of Integument and Health in Laying Hens. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 2006; 23: 153-159.

Barbosa HP, Fialho ET, Ferreira ASG, Lima JMM, Gomes MFM. Triguilho para suínos nas fases inicial de crescimento, crescimento e terminação”. Revista Sociedade Brasileira Zootecnia. 1992; 21: 827–837.

Costa FGP, Goulart CDEC, Costa JS, Souza CJDE, Barros LR, Silva JHV. Desempenho, qualidade de ovos e análise econômica da produção de poedeiras semipesadas alimentadas com diferentes níveis de raspa de mandioca. Acta Scientiarum Acta Sciences. 2009; 31: 13-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i1.457

Agresti A. Na introduction to categorical data analysis. Jonh Wiley and Sons: New York. 2007.

Littell RC, Henry PR, Lewis AJ, Ammerman CB. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. Journal Animal Science. 1997; 75: 2672–2683. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.75102672x

Daryoush B, Pouria AS. Methionine in Poultry Nutrition: A Review. Journal of World’s Poultry Science. 2022; 1: 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10,58803/jwps.v1i1.1

Esteve-Garcia, E, Khan, DR, Relative Bioavailability of DL and L-Methionine in Broilers. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 2018; 8: 151–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.82011

Niknafs S, Fortes MRS, Cho S, Black JL, Roura E. Alanine-specific appetite in slow growing chickens is associated with impaired glucose transport and TCA cycle. BMC Genomics. 2022; 23:393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08625-2

Heeley N, Blouet C. Central Amino Acid Sensing in the Control of Feeding Behavior. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016; 23:148. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2016.00148

Wu Y, Tang J, Cao J, Zhang B, Chen Y, Xie M, Zhou Z, Hou S. Effect of Dietary L-Methionine Supplementation on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, and Plasma Parameters of Starter Pekin Ducks at Different Dietary Energy Levels. Animals. 2021; 11: 144. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010144

Xião X, Wang Y, Liu W, Ju T, Zhan X. Effects of different methionine sources on production and reproduction performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices of broiler breeders. Asiático-Australas Journal Animal Science. 2017; 30: 828-833. doi: https://doi.org/10.5713%2Fajas.16.0404

Ma M, Geng S, Liu M, Zhao L, Zhang J, Huang S, Ma Q. Effects of Different Methionine Levels in Low Protein Diets on Production Performance, Reproductive System, Metabolism, and Gut Microbiota in Laying Hens. Front. Nutr. 2021; 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.739676

Hiramoto K, Muramatsu T, Okumura J. Effect of Methionine and Lysine Deficiencies on Protein Synthesis in the Liver and Oviduct and in the Whole Body of Laying Hens. Poultry Science. 1990; 69: 84-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690084

Ma G, Ayalew H, Mahmood T, Mercier Y, Wang J, Lin J, Wu S, Qiu K, Qi G, Zhang H. Methionine and vitamin E supplementation improve production performance, antioxidant potential, and liver health in aged laying hens. Poultry Science. 2024; 103 (12): 104415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104415

Nelson DL, Cox MM. Princípios de bioquímica de Lehninger. Artmed, Porto Alegre. 2019.

Kodali VK, Gannon AS, Paramasivan S, Raje S, Polenova T, Thorpe C. A Novel Disulfide-Rich Protein Motif from Avian Eggshell Membranes”. PLosone. 2011; 6: e18187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0018187

EFSA. Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Fee (FEEDAP). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of calcium hydroxy analogue of methionine (HMBA-Ca) as a feed additive for poultry. EFSA Journal. 2012; 10(3): 2610. doi: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2610

Esteve-Garcia E, Khan DR. Relative Biovailability of DL and L-Methionine in Broiles. 2018; 8: 151-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.82011

Martín-Venegas RM, Rodriguez-Lagunas MJ, Geraert P, Ferrer R. Monocarboxylate transporter 1 mediates DL-2-hydroxy- (4-methylthio) butanoic acid transport across the apical membrane of Caco-2 cell monolayers. Journal Nutrition. 2017; 137: 49-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.1.49

Maynard CW, Gilbert E, Yan F, Cline MA, Dridi, S. Peripheral and Central Impact of Methionine Source and Level on Growth Performance, Circulating Methionine Levels and Metabolism in Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2023; 13(12), 1961. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121961

Published

2025-09-18

How to Cite

FERREIRA , Thamires da Silva; SOARES, Márcia das Neves; KANEKO , Isabelle Naemi; PINHEIRO , Sarah Gomes; COSTA, FernandoGuilherme Perazzo; JÚNIOR , Romilton Ferreira de Barros. Relative bioeffectiveness of hydroxy calcium salt analogous methionine compared to DL-methionine on the performance of light laying hens in the production phase. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 26, 2025. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v26e-81118E. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/81118. Acesso em: 6 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

ANIMAL SCIENCE

Data statement

  • The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript