FED INTAKE AND MILK PRODUCTION OF HOLSTEIN-ZEBU CROSSBREED COWS HOLD IN DIFFERENT TROPICAL PASTURES

Authors

  • Edmundo Benedetti Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Norberto Mario Rodríguez Escola de Veterinária da UFMG
  • Warley Efrem Campos Escola de Veterinária da UFMG
  • Ana Luiza Costa Cruz Borges Escola de Veterinária da UFMG
  • Eloísa Simões Saliba Escola de Veterinária da UFMG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/cab.v9i3.794

Keywords:

Produção de bovinos

Abstract

Fed intake and milk production of Holstein-Zebu crossbred cows, grazing Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) (NAP), Brachiaria decumbens (BRA) and Guinea grass (Pannicum maximum) (COL) and supplemented with four kg of concentrate, were evaluated in a double Latin square (3x3). Fecal production and feed intake were calculated using Cr2O3 and in vitro digestibility. Dry mater intake (DMI) was similar among forages (18kg/cow) which represented 2.72%; 2.84% and 2.96% of the live weight for NAP, BRACH and COL respectively. The intake per unit of metabolic size (g DM/kg0.75) was 130 for NAP, 135 for BRACH and 145 for COL. The intake of BRACH resulted in lower milk production (14,4kg) than NAP (15,5kg) and COL (16,1Kg). Grasses did not affected the milk composition which showed 4,03% of fat, 2,46% of protein and 12,42% of total solids. It was concluded that NAP, BRACH and COL are good alternatives for milk production in grazing systems.

KEY WORDS: Brachiaria decumbens, Guinea grass, Panicum maximum, Napier, Pennisetum purpureum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Norberto Mario Rodríguez, Escola de Veterinária da UFMG

Departamento de Zootecnia

Ana Luiza Costa Cruz Borges, Escola de Veterinária da UFMG

Departamento de Zootecnia

Published

2008-10-14

How to Cite

BENEDETTI, E.; RODRÍGUEZ, N. M.; CAMPOS, W. E.; BORGES, A. L. C. C.; SALIBA, E. S. FED INTAKE AND MILK PRODUCTION OF HOLSTEIN-ZEBU CROSSBREED COWS HOLD IN DIFFERENT TROPICAL PASTURES. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 9, n. 3, p. 578–589, 2008. DOI: 10.5216/cab.v9i3.794. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/794. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Animal Production