Impact of feed management on diet selectivity, performance, and economic return of feedlot lambs

Authors

Abstract

The development of feeding strategies can improve production indices and financial returns
in livestock systems. This study evaluated the effects of bunk management and feeding adjustment
intervals on selectivity, performance, feed refusals, and economic return of feedlot lambs. Sixty
crossbred White Dorper x Ile de France lambs (27.89 kg ± 3.71 kg) at approximately 90 days of age (± X
days) were assigned to treatments based on body weight, allocated to one of twenty pens (five pens,
four blocks, and three animals per pen). The experiment consisted of a randomized block design with
a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement and treatments consisting of bunk management for feed refusals of
5–10% and 10–15% and two feeding adjustment intervals every two or three days. Bunk management
for feed refusals of 5–10% led to a higher intake of particles smaller than 4 mm (50.73% and 49.37%,
P = 0.0022), lower feed waste (0.220 and 0.246 kg DM/day, P < 0.0001), and higher dry matter intake
(DMI) (3.775 kg/day, P = 0.0440). Feeding adjustment performed every three days showed higher feed
supply (3.966 kg and 3.863 kg DM/day, P = 0.0005) and higher DMI both in kg/day (3.775 kg/day, P =
0.0004) and body weight (3.334% and 3.233% of LW, P = 0.0150). Management with feed refusals of
5–10% and a feeding adjustment interval every three days presented the highest revenue (R$ 688.15)
and the lowest cost per kilogram (R$ 2.57). Therefore, bunk management for feed refusals of 5–10%
and feeding adjustment intervals every three days was the most viable strategy.

Downloads

References

Aldosari FO. Gender participation in sheep and goat farming in Najran, Southern Saudi Arabia. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2018; 25(1):144-148. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.03.013).

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal. 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9107-producao-da-pecuaria-municipal.html?edicao=25474&t=resultados>. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2024.

Rodrigues JL, Pereira Junior SAG, Castro Filho ES, Costa RV, Barducci RS, Cleef, EHCBV, Ezequiel JMB. Effects of elevated concentrations of soybean molasses on feedlot perfor-mance and meat quality of lambs. Livestock Science. 2020; 240:e04155. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104155).

Polli VA, Vaz RZ, Carvalho S, Costa PT, Mello RO, Restle J, Nigeliskii AF, Silveira IDB, Pissinin D. Thermal comfort and performance of feedlot lambs finished in two climatic con-ditions. Small Ruminant Research. 2019; 174:163-169. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.03.002).

Miller-Cushon EK, DeVries TJ. Feed sorting in dairy cattle: causes, consequences, and management. Journal of dairy science. 2017; 100(5):4172–83. (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11983).

Carvalho S, Frasson MF, Simões FSB, Bernardes GMC, Simões RR, Griebler L, Pellegrin ACRS, Menegon AM, Deponti LS, Severo MM, Mello VL. Resíduo úmido de cervejaria na terminação de cordeiros em confinamento e seus efeitos sobre as características da carcaça e dos componentes não carcaça. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2017; 69(3):742-750. (https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8573).

Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. The net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrients excretion. 5st ed. Ithaca: CNCPS; 2000. 237p.

National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. 6st ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2007. 362p.

Association official Analitical Chemistry. Official methods of analysis. 13st ed. Washington: AOAC; 1995. 1015p.

Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International. 2002; 85:1217-1240. (https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/85.6.1217).

Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e do Abastecimento (MAPA). Secretaria da Defe-sa Agropecuária (SDA). Departamento de Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal (DI-POA). Divisão de Normas Técnicas. Instrução Normativa n. 3, de 17 de janeiro de 2000. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico de Métodos de Insensibilização para o Abate Humanitário de Animais de Açougue. Diário Oficial da União. 2000 jan 24; seção 1. https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/defesa-agropecuaria/animal/bem-estar-animal/arquivos/arquivos-legislacao/in-03-de-2000.pdf/view

Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Bio-metrika, 1965; 52(3): 591-S611. (https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709)

Hofmann RR. Evolutionary steps ecophysiological adaptation ans diversification of rumi-nants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia. 1989; 78(4):443-457. (https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378733)

Hofmann RR, Stewart DRM. Grazer or browser: a classification based on the stomach-structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia. 1972; 36(2):226-240. (https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1972.36.2.226).

Mertens DR. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. 1997; 80(7):1463-1481. (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2).

DeVries TJ, Keyserlingk MAGV, Beauchemin KA. Frequency of feed delivery affects the behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2005; 88(10):3553-3562. (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73040-X).

Leonardi C, Armentano LE. Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2003; 86(2):557- 564. (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73634-0).

Della Rosa MM, Toffaletti JR, Aello MS, Burges JC. Feed bunk management effects steer performance and behaviour. Animal Production Science. 2020; 60(11):1442-1448. (https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18614).

Haselmann A, Zehetgruber K, Waltl BF, Zollitsch W, Knaus W, Zebeli Q. Feeding forages with reduced particle size in a total mixed ration improves feed intake, total-tract digestibil-ity, and performance of organic dairy cows. Journal of dairy science. 2019; 102(10):8839-8849. (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16191).

Nasrollahi SM, Imani M, Zebeli Q. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of forage particle size level, and preservation method on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015; 98(12):8926-8939. (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9681).

González LA, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Ferret A. Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review). Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2012; 172(1-2):66-79. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009).

Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Beauchemin KA, Gibb DJ, Crews Jr DH, Hickman DD, Street-er M, McAllister TA. Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: A review. Journal of Animal Science. 2003; 81(14): 149-158. (https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8114_suppl_2E149x).

Pacheco PS, Silva RM da, Padua JT, Restle J, Taveira RZ, Vaz FN, Pascoal LL, Olegario JL, Menezes, FR de. Análise econômica da terminação de novilhos em confinamento receben-do diferentes proporções de cana-de-açúcar e concentrado. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 2014; 35(2):999-1011. (http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679- 0359.2014v35n2p999).

Published

2025-02-13

How to Cite

SOUZA, D. M. de; COSTA, C.; MEIRELLES, P. R. de L.; CASTILHOS, A. M. de; PARIZ, C. M.; BARROS, J. da S.; FURLAN, L. B. Impact of feed management on diet selectivity, performance, and economic return of feedlot lambs. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 26, 2025. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/78360. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2025.