Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v23e-70663E

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of adding levels of emulsifier based on soy lecithin and enzymatic complex (xylanase, β-glucanase, galactosidase, protease, amylase, and β-mannanase) on the basal diet during the raising of free-range broiler chickens. The experimental design was completely randomized, with five treatments and six replications. Treatments were: T1: control diet, without enzymatic complex and emulsifier; T2: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex; T3: 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; T4: 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier; and T5: 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex + 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier. Performance data were collected every 14 days, and the animals were euthanized at 70 days to obtain carcass, breast, drumstick, and thigh yield and intestine collection for pH analysis and morphometry. The periods from 1 to 56 and 1 to 70 days showed a difference (P<0.05) in the parameters of zootechnical performance, the feed intake was lower in T4 and T5, and weight gain was better in T1, T2, T3, and T4. Feed conversion was better in T1, T2, and T4. No difference (P>0.05) was observed for poultry livability, carcass yield, viscera, and pH of duodenum and cecum. A difference was found for intestinal morphometry (P<0.05), and T5 showed the best villus/crypt ratio. The level with 0.3 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 1 kg t−1 of emulsifier indicated a better relationship between villi and crypts. However, the level with 0.2 kg t−1 of enzymatic complex and 0.5 kg t−1 of emulsifier added to the commercial diet led to benefits such as decreased feed intake, without affecting weight gain, thus inducing a good feed conversion.
Keywords: Additives; Performance; Intestinal morphometry; Carcass yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Guerreiro Neto A, Pezzato A, Sartori J, Mori C, Cruz V, Fascina V, et al. Emulsifier in broiler diets containing different fat sources. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. 2011;13(2):119–25. English doi: (https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2011000200006).

Duarte B, Café MB, Stringhini JH, Brito, Gonçalves JA, Leonardo P, Silva RD. Avaliação de programas nutricionais com a utilização de carboidrases e fitase em rações de frangos de corte. Ciência Animal Brasileira. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Oct 25]; 13(1) Available from: https://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/handle/ri/359

Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2013;22(6);711–28. doi: (https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507)

Pelicano L, Alves SP, Borba H, De Souza A, Oba A, et al. Morfometria e ultra-estrutura da mucosa intestinal de frangos de corte alimentados com dietas contendo diferentes probióticos intestinal mucosa structure and ultrastructure in broilers fed with diets supplemented with different probiotics. Ciências Veterinárias. 2003 [cited 2021 oct 25];98(547);125–34. Available from: http://www.fmv.ulisboa.pt/spcv/PDF/pdf9_2003/547_125_134.pdf

SISVAR: A computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Revista Brasileira de Biometria. 2019;Dec;20;37(4):529. doi: (https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v37i4.450)

Dalólio FS, Moreira J, Vaz DP, Albino LFT, Valadares LR, Pires AV, et al. Exogenous enzymes in diets for broilers. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Oct 26];17;149–61. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbspa/a/FD7Z9pHqLwmkGj6K5YHJs5x/?lang=en

Cho J, Zhao P, Kim IH. Effects of emulsifier and multi-enzyme in different energy density diet on growth performance, blood profiles, and relative organ weight in broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2012;4(10);161-168 doi: (http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n10p161)

Barbosa A, Nilva I, Sakomura K, Aparecida Bonato M, Hauschild L, et al. Enzimas exógenas em dietas de frangos de corte: desempenho. Ciência Rural. 2012 [cited 2021 Oct 26];42(8);1497-1502. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/cr/a/k64L4FbrPTLp75jp53JjzMk/?format=pdf&lang=pt

Vaz DP, Dalólio FS, Moreira J, Pinheiro SRF, Lara LJC, Valadares LR, et al. Características do trato digestivo, metabolizabilidade e retenção de nutrientes em frangos de corte alimentados com complexo enzimático. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 24];72(1);1069-1074 Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/a/RpgbC4bxRdsKvr8VSsxdQzm/?lang=pt

Fonseca SS da, Silva VC da, Valentim JK, Geraldo A. Efeito da adição de diferentes emulsificantes na dieta sobre o rendimento de carcaça de frangos de corte. Revista Acadêmica Ciência Animal [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2021 Maio 17]; 16(0);1–13. Available from: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/cienciaanimal/article/view/e16010.

Kamran J, Mehmood S, Mahmud A, Saima. Effect of fat sources and emulsifier levels in broiler diets on performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass parameters. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 15];22(1). Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbca/a/5wzgDnM4CcgVchLst5rRJHn/?lang=en

Zhao PY, Kim IH. Effect of diets with different energy and lysophospholipids levels on performance, nutrient metabolism, and body composition in broilers. Poultry science [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 14];96(5);1341–1347. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28204735

Oliveira LS de, Balbino EM, Silva TNS, Ily L, Rocha TC da, Strada ES de O, et al. Use of emulsifier and lipase in feeds for broiler chickens. Semina: Ciências Agrárias [Internet]. 2019 Sep 30 [cited 2021 Oct 26];40(6);3181-3196. Available from: https://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/viewFile/34926/26141

Fernandes B, Martins M, Mendes A, Milbradt E, Sanfelice C, Martins B, et al. Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. 2014;16(4);417–24. doi: (https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-635X1604417-424).

Qaisrani SN, Moquet PCA, van Krimpen MM, Kwakkel RP, Verstegen MWA, Hendriks WH. Protein source and dietary structure influence growth performance, gut morphology, and hindgut fermentation characteristics in broilers. Poultry Science [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Oct 28];93(12);3053–3064. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119385608

Kubiś M, Kołodziejski P, Pruszyńska-Oszmałek E, Sassek M, Konieczka P, Górka P, et al. Emulsifier and xylanase can modulate the gut microbiota activity of broiler chickens. Animals. 2020;10(12);2197. doi: (https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122197).

Wickramasuriya SS, Macelline SP, Cho HM, Hong JS, Park SH, Heo JM. Physiological effects of a tallow-incorporated diet supplemented with an emulsifier and microbial lipases on broiler chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;(22)7. doi: (https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.583998)

Verdal H, Mignon-Grasteau S, Jeulin C, Le Bihan-Duval E, Leconte M, Mallet S, et al. Digestive tract measurements and histological adaptation in broiler lines divergently selected for digestive efficiency. Poultry Science. 2010;89(9):1955–1961. doi: (https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-813).

Valentim JK, Garcia RG, Pietramale RTR, Velarde JMDS, Barbosa DK, Castilho VAR de, et al. Aditivos emulsificantes em dietas de aves de produção. Research, Society and Development [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 21];9(3)+. Available from: https://www.rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2567

Published

2022-06-20

How to Cite

NASCIMENTO, A. M. do; ´GOMES, F. A.; FREITAS, H. J. de; RODRIGUES, S. F. da C.; PIRES, G. A.; GUATO, C. A.; SOUZA, E. M. de. Emulsifier and enzymatic complex in diet for free range broiler chicken in the western amazon. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 23, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v23e-70663E. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/70663. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.