Identification and resistance to Salmonella enterica antimicrobials isolated from live birds in commercial resellers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v21e-64646Abstract
This work aimed was to investigate the health and management characteristics of live bird resales, identification and antigenic characterization of Salmonella enterica and its sensitivity to antimicrobials. Structured questionnaires were applied and 627 samples were collected from cages, 209 from excreta, 209 from feed and 209 from drinking fowls, being processed by conventional bacteriology. The isolates obtained were submitted to the susceptibility test to 12 antimicrobials by the disc diffusion method. It was verified that 91.7% of the resales studied house Gallus gallus domesticus together with other animal species, commercialize birds with little zoosanitary documentation, active surveillance is unsatisfactory, and use and commercialize antimicrobials indiscriminately. Salmonella enterica was detected in 1.4% (9/627) of samples analysed in cages, 1.9% (4/209) in excreta and 0.95% (2/209) in feed, and 1.4% (3/209) in trough swabs, which were antigenically characterized as Salmonella Heidelberg, Gallinarum, Risen, Ndolo, Saint Paul, Mbandaka subesp enterica O:6,7. In the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility resistance was obtained of 44.4% (4/9) for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 33.3% (3/9) for enrofloxacin, 22.2% (2/9) for ciprofloxacin, ceftiofur, amoxicillin and 11.1% (1/9) for tetracycline and phosphomycin. Salmonella Heidelberg as well as the serovars Gallinarum, Risen, Saint Paul and Mbandaka showed resistance to at least one of the antimicrobials tested. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and enrofloxacin were the least effective antimicrobials. Sorovars such as Heidelberg, Gallinarum and Mbandaka showed multidrug resistance to antimicrobials commonly used in human and veterinary medicine, which implies potential unique health risks.
Downloads
References
Goiás. Agência Goiana de Defesa Agropecuária. Programa Estadual de Sanidade Avícola. Goiânia. [Internet]. Goiás: Agrodefesa; 2014 [Cited 2019 mai 29]. Available from: https://www.agrodefesa.go.gov.br/defesasanitariaanimal/programas.html?id=388:programa-estadual-de-sanidade-avicol&catid=158
Silva TM, Milbradt EL, Zamae JC, Andreatti Filho RL, Okamoto AS. Transferência de resistência antimicrobiana entre enterobactérias patogênicas de importância aviária-Impactos em saúde pública. Archives of Veterinary Science [Online]. 2016; 21(2):9-20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/avs.v21i2.40245 Portuguese.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/avs.v21i2.40245
Santana ES, Oliveira FH, Barnabé ACS, Mendes FR, Andrade MA. Uso de antibióticos e quimioterápicos na avicultura. Enciclopédia Biosfera [Online]. 2011 May [cited 2018 Apr 22];7(12):01-21. Available from: https://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/xmlui/handle/ri/13549 Portuguese.
» https://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/xmlui/handle/ri/13549
WHO. Implementation of the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Genebra: World Health Organization [Online]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 04]; p.1-99. Availabre from: https://www.amcra.be/swfiles/files/WHO%20actieplan_90.pdf
» https://www.amcra.be/swfiles/files/WHO%20actieplan_90.pdf
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa Nº 62, de 26 de agosto de 2003. Diário Oficial da União. 2003 Set 18; Seção 1. Portuguese.
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. Portaria n° 126, de 3 de novembro de 1995. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 1995 Nov 06, Seção 1:17694- 17698. Portuguese. Available from:
CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility. 28th ed.: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. 296p. English.
Wei S, Morrison M, Yu Z. Bacterial census of poultry intestinal. Poultry Science [Online]. 2013 Mar [cited 2020 Apr 22]. 92(3):671-683. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02822 English.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02822
Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Secretaria da Defesa Agropecuária. Manual de legislações - Programas Nacionais de Saúde Animal do Brasil. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento [Online]. 2009 [cited 2020 Jul 13]; p.1-441. Available from: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/sanidade-animal-e-vegetal/saude-animal/arquivos-das-publicacoes-de-saude-animal/manual-de-legislacao-saude-animal-low.pdf/view
Auge M. Vulnerabilidade de acuíferos. Revista Latino-Americana de Hidrogeologia. 2004;4:86- 103. Spanish.
Monteiro JH. Manual de Gerenciamento de Resíduos Sólidos (IBAM). Cadernos Rede ITEGO [Online]; 2018 [Cited 2020 Mar 22]; 1(1):202-496. Available from: http://www.ead.go.gov.br/cadernos/index.php/CDP/article/view/98 Portuguese.
» http://www.ead.go.gov.br/cadernos/index.php/CDP/article/view/98
Regitano JB, Leal RMP. Comportamento e impacto ambiental de antibióticos usados na produção animal brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo [Online]. 2010 [Cited 2019 Dez 15]; 34:601-616. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000300002 Portuguese.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000300002
Medeiros MAN, Oliveira DCN de, Rodrigues DP, Freitas DRC. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in chicken carcasses at retail in 15 Brazilian cities. Rev Panam Salud Publica [Online]. 2011 [Cited 2019 mar 05];30(6):555-560. Available from: DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/s102049892011001200010 English.
» http://doi.org/10.1590/s102049892011001200010
Pandini J, Pandini A, Pinto FGS, Muller JM, Weber LD, Moura AC. Ocorrência e perfil de resistencia antimicrobiana de sorotipos de Salmonella sp. isolados de aviários do Paraná. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico [Online]. 2015 Apr [Cited 2019 set 20]; 82:1-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000352013 Portuguese.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000352013
Ugbogu OC, Nwachukwu NC. Isolation of Salmonella and Shigella species from house flies (Musca domestica) in Uturu, Nigeria. Afr J Biotech [Online]. 2006 [Cited 2020 Fev 20]; 5(11):1090-1091. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/42976 English.
» https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/42976
Holt OS, Christopher J, Moore GRW, Gast RK. Isolation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from houseflies (Musca domestica) found in rooms containing Salmonella serovar Enteritidis challenged hens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology [Online]. 2007 [Cited 2020 Jul 04]; 73(19):6030- 6035. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00803-07 English.
» https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00803-07
Stepanovic S, C´irkovic I, Ranin L, Svabic-Vlahovic M. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Letters in Applied Microbiology [Online]. 2004 [Cited 2020 Jun 28]; 38:428- 432. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01513.x English.
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01513.x
Costerton JW, Stewart OS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial Biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science [Online]. 1999 [Cited 2020 Mar 21]; 284(5418):1318-1322. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 English.
» https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318
Gama NMSQ, Togashi CK, Ferreira NT, Buim MR, Guastalli EL; Fiagá, DAM. Conhecendo a água utilizada para as aves de produção. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico [Online]. 2008 [Cited 2019 Dez 01]; 70(1):43-49. Available from: http://www.biologico.agricultura.sp.gov.br/uploads/docs/bio/v70_1/gama.pdf Portuguese.
» http://www.biologico.agricultura.sp.gov.br/uploads/docs/bio/v70_1/gama.pdf
Burt CR, Proudfoot JC, Roberts M, Horowitz RH. Fatal myocarditis secondary to Salmonella septicaemia in a young adult. J Emerg Med. [Online]. 1990 [Cited 2019 jan 13]; 8:295-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(90)90009-k English.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(90)90009-k
Namata H, Welby S, Aerta M, Faes C, Abrahantes JC, Imberechts H, Vermeersch K, Hooyberghs J, Méroc E. Identification of risk factors for the prevalence and persistence of Salmonella in Belgian broiler chicken flocks. Preventive Veterinary Medicine [Online]. 2009 [Cited 2020 Jan 21]; 90(3-4):211-222. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.006 English.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.006
Jones FT. A review of practical Salmonella control measures in animal feed. J Appl Poult Res. [Online]. 2011 [Cited 2019 mar 01]; 20:102-113. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00281 English.
» https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00281
Lapuz RR, Umali DV, Suzuki T, Shirota K, Katoh H. Comparison of the prevalence of Salmonella infection in layer hens from commercial layer farms with high and low rodent densities. Avian Dis. [Online]. 2012 [Cited 2020 Jun 01];56(1):29-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1637/9704030711-Reg.1 English.
» https://doi.org/10.1637/9704030711-Reg.1
Galdino VMCA, Melo RT, Oliveira RP, Mendonça EP, Navelando PC, Rossi A. Virulência de Salmonella spp. de origem avícola e resistência a antimicrobianos. Bioscience Journal [Online]. 2013 [Cited 2020 Jul 14]; 29(4):932-939. Available from: http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/14488 Portuguese.
» http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/14488
Henzler DJ, Opitz HM. The role of mice in the epizzootiology of Salmonella Enteritidis infection on chicken layer farms. Avian Diseases. 1992; 36:625-631.
Tu, LT, Hoang NVM, Cuong NV Cambell, J. High levels of contamination and antimicrobial-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars on pig and poultry farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Epidemiology and Infection [Online]. 2015 Oct [Cited 2020 Fev 23]; 143(14):3074-3086. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268815000102 English.
» https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268815000102
Chantziaras I, Boyen F, Callens B, Dewulf J. Correlation between veterinary antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals: a report on seven countries. J Antimicrob Chemother [Online]. 2014 [Cited 2020 Jul 13]; 69: 827-834. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt443 English.
» https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt443
Pegues DA, Miller SI. Salmonella Species. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Filadélfia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2015. p.2559-2568. English.
Zishiri OT, Mkhize N, Mukaratirwa S. Prevalence of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in Salmonella spp. isolated from commercial chickens and human clinical isolates from South Africa and Brazil. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research [Online]. 2016 [Cited 2020 Jul 18]; 83(1):1-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v83i1.1067 English.
» https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v83i1.1067
Penha Filho RAC, Ferreira JC, Kanashiro AMI, Costa Alda, Berchieri Junior A. Suscetibilidade a antimicrobianos de Salmonella Gallinarum e Salmonella Pullorum isolados de aves doentes no Brasil. Cienc. Rural [Online]. 2016 [Cited 2020 Jul 18]; 46(3):513-518. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150398 Portuguese.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 CIÊNCIA ANIMAL BRASILEIRA (Brazilian Animal Science)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
