Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v21e-58858

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of using dLys:TP instead of crude protein recommendations of commercial poultry breeding companies to meet the chicken's need for dietary essential and non-essential amino acids. The ingredient composition matrix used in the feed formulation was compiled from Feedstuffs Magazine. The rations were formulated using a linear feed formulation program to meet the minimum cost, with crude protein or dLys: TP of 5.58%. Using the dLys to TP ratio versus CP minimums for the model diets chosen, formula costs were changed from +$10.96 to -$4.26 per ton of feed. The magnitude of the changes was dependent on the imbalance present in the feeds from using the breeder management guide recommendations and ingredient prices. Through the use of dLys: TP, it is possible to improve the feed formulation process, assuring the birds get adequate EAA and NEAA without being wasteful and reducing environmental pollution.
Key Words: amino acids; concentration; digestibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corzo A, Loar RE, Kidd MT. Limitations of dietary isoleucine and valine in broiler chick diets. Poultry

Science. 2009;88(9):1934-1938.

Vieira SL, Stefanello C, Cemin HS. Lowering the dietary protein levels by the use of synthetic

amino acids and the use of a mono component protease. Animal Feed Science and Technology.

;(221)262-266.

Aviagen Inc. 2007. ROSS 308 Broiler & Ross 708: Nutrition Specification. Aviagen, Huntsville, AL. http://

en.aviagen.com.

Hy-Line International. 2004–2006. Hy-Line W-98 Commercial Management Guide, 2004–2006. Hy-Line

Int., West Des Moines, IA.

Sriperm N, Pesti GM, Tillman PB. Evaluation of the fixed nitrogen‐to‐protein (N: P) conversion factor

(6.25) versus ingredient specific N: P conversion factors in feedstuffs. Journal Science Food Agriculture.

;91(7):1182-1186.

Mariotti F, Tome D, Mirand PP. Converting nitrogen into protein: beyond 6.25 and Jones’ factors. Food

Science Nutrition. 2008;48(2):177–184.

Alhotan RA, Pesti GM. Quantitative estimates of the optimal balance between digestible lysine and the

true protein contents of broiler feeds. British Poultry Science. 2016;57(4):538-550.

Batal A, Dale N. 2015. Feedstuffs. Ingredient analysis tables, University of Georgia, Athens.

Evonik Industries. 2005. Optimum ratio of essential amino acids nitrogen to total nitrogen in broiler

diets. Facts and Figures, Poultry No. 1586

Lysine, H. (1996). Digestibility of essential amino acids for poultry and swine, version 3.3. Heartland Lysine. Inc., Chicago, IL.

Pesti GM, Alhotan R, Vedenov D.; et al. 2016. Windows User-Friendly Feed Formulation 2.0. Can

be accessed from the website: https://cfas.ksu.edu.sa/sites/cfas.ksu.edu.sa/files/imce_images/

wuffda2.1.xls

Greenland S. Null misinterpretation in statistical testing and its impact on health risk assessment.

Preventive Medicine. 2011;53(4-5):225–228.

Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, Altman DG. Statistical tests, P

values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. European Journal Epidemiology.

;31(4):337–350.

Payne, R.L. The potential for using low crude protein diets for broilers and turkeys. Degussa

AminoNews. 2007;6(3) 8:2-13.

Pesti GM. Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feeds on biological

performance. Journal Applied Poultry Research. 2009;18(3):477-486.

Published

2020-08-06

How to Cite

BROCH, J.; NUNES, R. V.; ALHOTAN, R. A.; PESTI, G. M. Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 21, 2020. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v21e-58858. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.