Nutritional value and digestible dry matter production of oat genotypes for ensiling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v21e-58129

Abstract

This study evaluated dry matter yield and nutritional characteristics of different oat genotypes (Avena spp.) for ensiling. Treatments consisted of genotypes of white oat IPR 126 (Avena sativa), black oat Cabocla IPR and Agrocoxilha (Avena strigosa), and BRS Madrugada and BRS Centauro (Avena vertis). Oats were harvested at the phenological stage of milk/dough grain. The design was a completely randomized block scheme, with five treatments and three replications per treatment. The IPR Cabocla genotype showed the highest dry matter content (before and after silo opening) and in vitro dry matter digestibility of fresh forage. No differences were observed for in vitro dry matter digestibility and dry matter losses among silages. The highest silage digestible dry matter yield (kg ha-1) was observed for the BRS Centauro genotype. Thus, despite the better nutritional quality presented by the IPR Cabocla genotype before ensiling, BRS Centauro genotype presented a higher yield of digestible dry matter per hectare.
Keywords: winter crop; ensiling; in vitro dry matter digestibility; dry matter losses

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jobim CC, Pereira JRA, Santos GT. Sistemas de produção de leite com ênfase na utilização de volumosos

conservados. In: Reis RA, Siqueira GR, Bertipaglia LMA. (Eds.) Volumosos na produção de ruminantes.

Jaboticabal: Funep; 2005. p.61-82. (Portuguese language)

Meinerz GR, Olivo CJ, Viégas J, Nörnberg JL, Agnolin CA, Scheibler RB, Horst T, Fontaneli RS. Silagem

de cereais de inverno submetidos ao manejo de duplo propósito. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011;

(10):2097-2104. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982011001000005. (Portuguese language)

David DBD, Nörnberg JL, Azevedo EBD, Brüning G, Kessler JD, Skonieski FR. Nutritional value of black and

white oat cultivars ensiled in two phenological stages. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2010; 39:p.1409-

doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982010000700003. (Portuguese language)

Carvalho PCF, Santos DD, Gonçalves EN, Moraes AD, Nabinger C. Forrageiras de Clima Temperado. In:

D. M. Da Fonseca e J. Z. Marstucello (Ed.). Plantas Forrageiras. Viçosa: Editora UFV, 2013, Cap.15, p.494-

(Portuguese language)

Wallsten J, Nadeau E, Bertilsson J, Martinsson K. Voluntary intake and diet selection by dairy heifers

fed ensiled whole-crop barley and oats harvested at different stages of maturity. Livestock Science. 2008;

(1):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.031. (Portuguese language)

Paris W, Zamarchi G, Pavinato PS, Martin TN. Qualidade da silagem de aveia preta sob efeito de estádios

fenológicos, tamanhos de partícula e pré-murchamento. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal.

; 16(3):486-498. doi: 0.1590/S1519-99402015000300002. (Portuguese language)

dos Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, dos Anjos LHC, de Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, de Almeida JA,

de Araujo Filho JC, de Oliveira JB, Cunha TJF. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos 2ª ed. Embrapa

Solos-Livros técnicos (INFOTECA-E); 2006. (Portuguese language)

Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo (CQFS RS/SC). Manual de adubação e calagem para os

Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. 10ª ed. Porto Alegre, SBCS - Núcleo Regional Sul/

UFRGS; 2004. 400p. (Portuguese language)

Jobim CC, Nussio LG, Reis RA, Schmidt P. Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da

forragem conservada. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2007; 36(1):101-119. doi: 10.1590/S1516-

(Portuguese language)

Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Análise de alimentos, métodos químicos e biológicos. 3.ed.Viçosa: UFV; 2009.

p. (Portuguese language)

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 16.ed. Washington,

DC; 1990. 1422p.

Van Soest, PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch

polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 1991; 74(10):3583-3597. doi:

3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.

Van Soest, PJ. (1967). Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to

forages. Journal of animal Science. 1967; 26(1):119-128. doi: 10.2527/jas1967.261119x

Holden L. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Dairy

Science. 1999; 82(8):1791-1794. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982009001100007.

Sas Institute. SAS / STAT user’s guide: Statistics, version 6. 4.ed. North Caroline, 1993. v.2. Total de

p.943.

Khorasani GR, Jedel PE, Helm JH, Kennelly JJ. Influence of stage of maturity on yield components and

chemical composition of cereal grain silages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1997; 77(2):259-267.

doi: 10.4141/A96-034.

Queiroz Filho JD, Silva DD, Nascimento ID. Produção de matéria seca e qualidade do capim-elefante

(Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) cultivar Roxo em diferentes idades de corte. Revista Brasileira de

Zootecnia. 2000; 29(1):69-74. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982000000100010. (Portuguese language)

Floss EL, Boin C, Palhano AL, Soares Filho CV, Premazzi LM. Efeito do estádio de maturação sobre

o rendimento e valor nutritivo da aveia branca no momento da ensilagem. Boletim de Indústria

Animal. 2003; 60(2):117-126. 2003. Disponível em: http://revistas.bvs-vet.org.br/bia/article/view/8723.

(Portuguese language)

Oliveira MR, Jobim CC, Neumann M, Bueno AVI, Leão GFM, Daniel, JLP. Effects of inoculation with

homolactic bacteria on the conservation of wheat silage stored in bunker-silos. Italian Journal of Animal

Science. 2017; 17(1):81-86. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2017.13456. (Portuguese language)

Weinberg ZG, Khanal P, Yildiz C, Chen Y, Arieli A. Effects of stage of maturity at harvest, wilting and

LAB inoculants on the aerobic stability wheat silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2010; 158(1-

:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.006.

Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Elferink SJWHO, Spoelstra SF. Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxton, DR,

et al. (Eds.). Silage science and technology. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy; 2003.

p.31-93.

Dewar WA, McDonald P, Whittenbury R. The hydrolysis of grass hemicelluloses during ensilage.

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1963; 14(6):411-417. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740140610.

Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2.ed. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, 1994.

p.

McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. 2a ed. Kingston: Chalcombe

Publications; 1991. 340p.

Taiz L.; Zeiger E. Plant physiology. New York: Sinauer; 2002. 690p.

Coan R, Freitas D, Reis R, Rodrigues L. Composição bromatológica das silagens de forrageiras de

inverno submetidas ou não ao emurchecimento e ao uso de aditivos. ARS veterinária 2001; 17(1):58-

Disponível em: http://www.arsveterinaria.org.br/arquivo/2001/v.17,%20n.1,%202001/58-63.pdf.

(Portuguese language)

Published

2020-06-16

How to Cite

IANK BUENO, Antonio Vinicius Iank; RIBEIRO, Matheus Gonçalves; JACOVACI, Fernando Alberto; TRÊS, Tamara Tais; LEÃO, Guilherme Fernando Mattos; GOMES, Ana luiza Mendonça; JOBIM, Clóves Cabreira. Nutritional value and digestible dry matter production of oat genotypes for ensiling. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 21, 2020. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v21e-58129. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58129. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

ANIMAL SCIENCE