MUSCLE FIBER, PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FOUR GENETIC GROUPS OF PIGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/cab.v12i3.5380Keywords:
Animal ProductionAbstract
The objective of this study was to verify the performance and carcass quality of pigs from four genetic lines and to correlate these data with the number and diameter of muscle fibers. A total of48 pigs were used and distributed into four treatments: high-lean commercial crossbred line; prolificacy commercial crossbred line; (Landrace X Large White) crossbred animals; and undefined genetic line. The experimental design consisted of a complete randomized design with a 4 x 2 factorial arrangement (4 genetic lines and 2 genders). Daily weight gain, daily feed intake and the feed conversion were evaluated. At slaughtering, the carcasses were evaluated and the number and the diameter of the muscle fibers of longissimus dorsi were assessed. The high-lean commercial line presented the greatest number of muscle cells (P<0.05) while the Landrace x Large White crossbred line presented the greater diameter (P<0.05). High-lean commercial line showed a better performance and carcass characteristics compared with the undefined genetic line (P<0.05) and the barrows presented the lowest results (P<0.05). The increment in the muscle fiber number affected positively the performance and carcass characteristics of pigs.
KEYWORDS: diameter of the muscle fibers; genetic groups; lean deposition; gender.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
