ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS

Authors

  • Carla Maria Vela Ulian Departamento de clínica Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu
  • Angie Paola Lagos Carvajal Pós-graduanda do Departamento de Cirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu
  • Diana Rocio Becera Velasquez Pós-graduanda do Departamento de Cirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu
  • Francisco José Teixeira Neto Departamento de Cirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu
  • Maria Lúcia Gomes Lourenço Departamento de clínica Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu
  • Simone Biagio Chiacchio Departamento de clínica Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/cab17437301

Keywords:

Animal Sanity

Abstract

Neonatal physiology has peculiarities inherent to the age group. The objective of this study was to monitor the systemic arterial pressure in lambs during neonatal period. We used 20 Ile de France lambs, from birth and at 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days of life. The following parameters were analyzed: heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and average blood pressure (ABP) by oscillometric method petMAP™, and SBP with Doppler. Invasive pressure validated indirect methods with the average 101.52 ± 12.04 mmHg. The averages with petMAP™ were as follows: HR (156.38 ± 37.46 bpm); DBP (63.80 ± 11.14 mmHg); ABP (81.58 ± 11.83 mmHg); SBP (112.48 ± 15.68 mmHg) and SBP by Dobler (90.27 ± 12.11 mmHg). There was significant difference in HR and blood pressure among the moments. Indirect methods differ between each other in 12.30 mmHg (overestimation   of 11%). Comparing with the invasive methods, both overestimated values of 4% and 16% in   PAS, respectively, for Doppler and petMAP™. The results showed that the Doppler method has established a good relationship with the invasive one being useful for gauging the SBP. The oscillometric method requires larger studies to be used in small ruminants.

Keywords: Doppler; lamb; neonatal period; oscillometric; systemic blood pressure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carla Maria Vela Ulian, Departamento de clínica Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu

Departamento de Clínica Veterinária

Área: Problemas clínicos de animais de produção

Maria Lúcia Gomes Lourenço, Departamento de clínica Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu

Departamento de Clínica Veterinária

Área: Afecções clínicas de cães e gatos

Simone Biagio Chiacchio, Departamento de clínica Veterinária da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (Unesp), campus Botucatu

Departamento de Clínica Veterinária

Área: Problemas clínicos de animais de produção

Downloads

Published

2016-10-28

How to Cite

ULIAN, C. M. V.; CARVAJAL, A. P. L.; VELASQUEZ, D. R. B.; TEIXEIRA NETO, F. J.; LOURENÇO, M. L. G.; CHIACCHIO, S. B. ACCURACY OF OSCILLOMETRIC (PETMAP™) AND DOPPLER METHODS TO INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN LAMBS. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 17, n. 4, p. 593–600, 2016. DOI: 10.1590/cab17437301. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/37301. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2016)

Section

Veterinary Medicine

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).