VIDEOLAPAROSCOPYC OVUM PICK-UP COMPARATIVE IN DORPER AND SANTA INES EWES

Authors

  • Endrigo Adonis Braga de Araujo Graduando em Medicina Veterinária. Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador-BA, Brasil
  • Sidnei Nunes de Oliveira Graduando em Medicina Veterinária. Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador-BA, Brasil
  • Alexandre de Faria Tabet Medico Veterinário autônomo, São Paulo, Brasil
  • Rodrigo Freitas Bittencourt Professor Adjunto. Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador-BA, Brasil
  • Marcos Chalhoub professor Associado II. Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador-BA, Brasil
  • Antonio de Lisboa Ribeiro Filho Professor Associado III Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador-BA, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/cab.v17i1.28347

Keywords:

Animal Reproduction

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the number of aspirated follicles, recovered oocytes, oocyte quality and viability between Dorper and Santa Inês ewes submitted to the videolaparoscopic ovum pick-up. To conduct this study, 118 follicular aspirations were performed, of which 65 were performed in Dorper ewes and 53 in Santa Ines ewes. The results for Dorper sheep were 28.31 ± 17.42 follicles/ewe, 12.21 ± 6.74 oocytes/ewe, recovery rate of 47.9% and 8.93 ± 5.25 viable oocytes/ewe. For Santa Inês ewes the results were 22.14 ± 16.08 follicles/ewe, 12.64 ± 8.29 oocytes/ewe, recovery rate of 55% and 8.92 ± 6.58 viable oocytes/ewe. There was no influence of breed on the number of aspirated follicles, recovered oocytes, recovery rate, oocyte quality and viability in videolaparoscopic ovum pick-up.
Keywords: follicle; oocyte; sheep

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-30

How to Cite

ARAUJO, E. A. B. de; DE OLIVEIRA, S. N.; TABET, A. de F.; BITTENCOURT, R. F.; CHALHOUB, M.; RIBEIRO FILHO, A. de L. VIDEOLAPAROSCOPYC OVUM PICK-UP COMPARATIVE IN DORPER AND SANTA INES EWES. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 17, n. 1, p. 98–104, 2016. DOI: 10.1590/cab.v17i1.28347. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/28347. Acesso em: 19 may. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Veterinary Medicine

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).