LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUE VERSUS OPEN TECHNIQUE IN SWINES ADRENALECTOMY

Authors

  • José Belarmino da Gama Filho PhD in Animal Science of the School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás (EVZ / UFG) and South Wing of Brasília Veterinary Medical Center. Email: belar@brturbo.com.br
  • Danilo Ferreira Rodrigues PhD student of the Graduate Program in Animal Science – EVZ/UFG.
  • Fernanda Figueiredo Mendes PhD student of the Graduate Program in Animal Science – EVZ/UFG.
  • Bruno Lopes Gama Graduating in Medicine from Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia.
  • Rejane Bernardes Souza Santos Master’s degree in Animal Science of the School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás (EVZ / UFG) and South Wing of Brasilia Veterinary Medical Center.
  • Leonardo Reis Corrêa Veterinary doctor of South Wing of Brasilia Veterinary Medical Center
  • José Renato Junqueira Borges Professor of the disciplines of Health and Ruminant and Equine Clinic, Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, University of Brasilia.
  • Luiz Antônio Franco da Silva Professor of the disciplines: Operative Techniques and Surgical Pathologies-EVZ/UFG.
  • Neusa Margarida Paulo Professor of the disciplines: Operative Techniques and Surgical Pathologies-EVZ/UFG.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/cab.v16i2.19209

Keywords:

adrenal glands, animal models, blood supply, Laparoscopy.

Abstract

Among the main benefits of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) compared to open adrenalectomy (OA) the rapid recovery of patients with decreased length of stay in hospital can be highlighted. The objective of this study was to compare the open adrenalectomy with laparoscopic adrenalectomy in swine. Thirty-two swine were operated. The animals had been divided into four groups (n = 8), one group was submitted to OA and the other to LA, together with its respective control group. Parameters were evaluated regarding operative time, body temperature, hematocrit, postoperative and intraoperative complications and time to deambulation. There was no meaningful difference between operative and deambulation times, even though the latter having been higher in the group submitted to OA. The most frequent intercurrences were in bowel, damage to adrenal vessels and renal hematoma. There were no significant blood losses, and observed hypothermia did not have any clinical impact. Laparoscopy in swine experimental adrenalectomy is a reliable technique that can serve as a reference for the surgical treatment of patients with adrenal diseases with surgical indications in other animal species.

Keywords: adrenal glands; animal models; blood supply; laparoscopy.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bruno Lopes Gama, Graduating in Medicine from Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia.

acadêmico do curso de medicina da faculade de medicina da Unb

Downloads

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

GAMA FILHO, J. B. da; RODRIGUES, D. F.; MENDES, F. F.; GAMA, B. L.; SANTOS, R. B. S.; CORRÊA, L. R.; BORGES, J. R. J.; SILVA, L. A. F. da; PAULO, N. M. LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUE VERSUS OPEN TECHNIQUE IN SWINES ADRENALECTOMY. Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira, Goiânia, v. 16, n. 2, p. 287–297, 2015. DOI: 10.1590/cab.v16i2.19209. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/19209. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Veterinary Medicine

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).