Características histopatológicas do intestino delgado e quantificação de bactérias ácido-láticas de frangos de corte suplementados com plectasina

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v25e-78210E

Resumo

Este estudo foi realizado para investigar as características histopatológicas do intestino delgado e quantificar a população de bactérias lácticas no ceco de frangos de corte suplementados com diferentes doses de plectasina, um peptídeo antimicrobiano com potencial para promover a saúde intestinal. O experimento incluiu dietas suplementadas com plectasina em doses de 150 ppm, 300 ppm e 450 ppm, além de um grupo controle negativo (sem antibiótico) e um controle positivo (com enramicina). A análise das lâminas de amostras do intestino delgado revelou uma diminuição na ocorrência e na gravidade das lesões histopatológicas, desde o duodeno até o íleo. Lesões no duodeno, como necrose, desepitelização das vilosidades, hemorragia e inflamação, foram reduzidas com a suplementação de plectasina, evidenciando seu potencial para promover a integridade estrutural do intestino delgado. No entanto, a avaliação da microbiota revelou uma contagem total de bactérias lácticas menor nos grupos tratados com plectasina, indicando sua incapacidade de aumentar a microbiota benéfica. Isso sugere uma melhor capacidade de absorção intestinal, com base no conceito de exclusão competitiva

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Kasimanickam V, Kasimanickam M, Kasimanickam R. Antibiotics Use in Food Animal Production: Escalation of Antimicrobial Resistance: Where Are We Now in Combating AMR? Med Sci (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;9(1).

Zhou X, Wang J, Lu C, Liao Q, Gudda FO, Ling W. Antibiotics in animal manure and manure-based fertilizers: Occurrence and ecological risk assessment. Chemosphere [Internet]. 2020;255:127006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127006

Wang S, Zeng X, Yang Q, Qiao S. Antimicrobial peptides as potential alternatives to antibiotics in food animal industry. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5).

Hao Y, Teng D, Mao R, Yang N, Wang J. Site Mutation Improves the Expression and Antimicrobial Properties of Fungal Defense. Antibiotics. 2023;12(8).

Oladokun S, Sharif S. Exploring the complexities of poultry respiratory microbiota: colonization, composition, and impact on health. Anim Microbiome [Internet]. 2024;6(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-024-00308-5

Gibson-Corley KN, Olivier AK, Meyerholz DK. Principles for Valid Histopathologic Scoring in Research. Vet Pathol. 2013;50(6):1007–15.

Abdul-Aziz T, Fletcher OJ, Barnes HJ, Shivaprasad HL, Swayne DE. Avian histopathology: 4th Edition [Internet]. American Association of Avian Pathologists. 2016. p. 654. Available from: https://www.aaap.info/avian-histopathology

Fathima S, Shanmugasundaram R, Adams D, Selvaraj RK. Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Their Manipulation for Improved Growth and Performance in Chickens. Foods. 2022;11(10):1–30.

Kai Y. Intestinal villus structure contributes to even shedding of epithelial cells. Biophys J [Internet]. 2021;120(4):699–710. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.003

Wang J, Liu S, Ma J, Piao X. Changes in Growth Performance and Ileal Microbiota Composition by Xylanase Supplementation in Broilers Fed Wheat-Based Diets. Front Microbiol. 2021;12(July).

Hu F, Gao X, She R, Chen J, Mao J, Xiao P, et al. Effects of antimicrobial peptides on growth performance and small intestinal function in broilers under chronic heat stress. Poult Sci. 2017;96(4):798–806.

Quinteiro-Filho WM, Rodrigues M V., Ribeiro A, Ferraz-de-Paula V, Pinheiro ML, Sá LRM, et al. Acute heat stress impairs performance parameters and induces mild intestinal enteritis in broiler chickens: Role of acute hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

axis activation. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(6):1986–94.

Song J, Xiao K, Ke YL, Jiao LF, Hu CH, Diao QY, et al. Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poult Sci. 2014;93(3):581–8.

Gieryńska M, Szulc-Dąbrowska L, Struzik J, Mielcarska MB, Gregorczyk-Zboroch KP. Integrity of the Intestinal Barrier: The Involvement of Epithelial Cells and Microbiota—A Mutual Relationship. Vol. 12, Animals. 2022. 1–32 p.

Jutfelt F. Barrier Function of the Gut. Encycl Fish Physiol From Genome to Environ [Internet]. 2011;2(January 2011):1322–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374553-8.00068-X

Mygind PH, Fischer RL, Schnorr KM, Hansen MT, Sönksen CP, Ludvigsen S, et al. Plectasin is a peptide antibiotic with therapeutic potential from a saprophytic fungus. Nature. 2005;437(7061):975–80.

Angelov A, Georgieva A, Petkova M, Bartkiene E, Rocha JM, Ognyanov M, et al. On the Molecular Selection of Exopolysaccharide-Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria from Indigenous Fermented Plant-Based Foods and Further Fine Chemical Characterization. Foods. 2023;12(18).

Lan PTN, Binh LT, Benno Y. Impact of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains feeding on fecal lactobacilli and weight gains in chicken. Vol. 49, Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 2003. p. 29–36.

Nazef L, Belguesmia Y, Tani A, Prévost H, Drider D. Identification of lactic acid bacteria from poultry feces: Evidence on anti-Campylobacter and anti-Listeria activities. Poult Sci. 2008;87(2):329–34.

Apajalahti J, Vienola K. Interaction between chicken intestinal microbiota and protein digestion. Anim Feed Sci Technol [Internet]. 2016;221:323–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.004

Ma JL, Zhao LH, Sun DD, Zhang J, Guo YP, Zhang ZQ, et al. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Recombinant Plectasin on Growth Performance, Intestinal Health and Innate Immunity Response in Broilers. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12(1):214–23.

Publicado

2024-09-25

Como Citar

RAMCHANDANI, N. S. V.; PARASO, M. G. V.; COLLANTES, T. M. A.; DELA CRUZ, J. F. Características histopatológicas do intestino delgado e quantificação de bactérias ácido-láticas de frangos de corte suplementados com plectasina. Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science, Goiânia, v. 25, 2024. DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v25e-78210E. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/78210. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2024.

Edição

Seção

MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA