The past as distraction

Engagements with history in the new Brazilian populism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rth.v25i2.74060

Keywords:

Updatism, Brazilian neo-populism, Bolsonarism, Bolsonaro

Abstract

In this article we analyze how the populist movement embodied by Bolsonaro engages with history in a way that activates its heterogeneous political base. These engagements seem to be different from some aspects of modern chronosophies, such as the abandonment of synchronization and the coherent presentation of a national history. Instead, the new populist historicity of the Brazilian far right is based more on affective attachment, a pragmatic and highly fragmented historical performance that, as we argue, more closely resembles a historicity we call “updatism”. To demonstrate the affinity we see between this historicity called updatism and the specific Bolsonarista version of the so-called neopopulism, this article is divided into three parts. First, we present the concept and theory of updatism. Next, we characterize the neopopulist dimensions of Bolsonarism, that is, the cultural and political movement represented by Jair Bolsonaro. Then, we analyze the new Brazilian populism in its engagements with history, especially the performances of history by the three secretaries of culture of the Bolsonaro government and how the defactualization of reality gains strength, creating the conditions of possibility for the past to be like a great closet full of ready-to-wear images and models.

Author Biographies

Mateus H. de Faria Pereira, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil, mateus.pereira@ufop.edu.br

Currículo: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7771118005300398

Valdei Lopes de Araujo, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil, valdei354@gmail.com

Currículo: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6432977406662637

References

ABRANCHES, Sérgio. O tempo dos governos incidentais. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020.

ANDERSON, Perry. Bolsonaro’s Brazil. London Review of Books, 2019. Disponível em https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n03/perry-anderson/bolsonaro-s-brazil. Acesso em 15 mar 2022.

ARAUJO, Valdei L. et al. Bolsotrump: realidades paralelas (2020-2022). Editora FGV, 2022.

ARAUJO, V. L.; PEREIRA, M. H. de F. Updatism: Gumbrecht's broad present, Hartog's Presentism and beyond. Diacronie: Studi di Storia Contemporanea, 43: 1-21, 2020.

ARAUJO, V. L.; PEREIRA, M. H. F. Atualismo 1.0: como a ideia de atualização mudou o século XXI. Vitória: Milfontes, 2019.

BARLETT, Lesley; VAVRUS, Frances. ‘Comparative Case Studies’. Educação & Realidade, 42(3): 899-920, 2017.

BERRY, David M. The Philosophy of Software. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.

BERRY, David M. Critical Theory and the Digital. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.

BRIGGLE, Adam. Dear Facebook?, in D.E. Wittkower (ed.), Facebook and Philosophy, pp. 161-172. Chicago: Open Court, 2010.

BURITY, Joanildo. The Brazilian Conservative Wave, the Bolsonaro Administration and Religious Actors. Brazilian Political Science Review, 15(3), 2021.

CHAGAS, Viktor. Meu malvado favorito: os memes bolsonaristas de WhatsApp e os acontecimentos políticos no Brasil. Estudos Históricos, 34: 169-196, 2021.

CHEYFITZ, Eric. The Disinformation Age. New York: Routledge, 2017.

CLAVERT, Frédéric. Face au passé : la Grande Guerre sur Twitter. Le Temps des médias, 31(2): 173-186, 2018.

FERES, João; GAGLIARDI, Juliana. Populism and the Media in Brazil: The Case of Jair Bolsonaro. In: KOHL, Christoph et al (ed.), The Politics of Authenticity and Populist Discourses, p. 83-104. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

FINCHELSTEIN, Federico. From Fascism to Populism in History. Berkeley: UCPRESS, 2019.

GAGO, Verónica. Neoliberalism from Below. Durham: Duke Universiy Press, 2017.

GOMES, Angela. M. de Castro. The History and Historiography of Populism in Brazil (1930 - 1964). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

GOMES, Angela. M. C.; DEVOTO, Fernando. J. Le gouvernement Bolsonaro : ni fascisme ni populisme, autoritarisme radical. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.politika.io/fr/article/gouvernement-bolsonaro-fascisme-populisme-autoritarisme-radical. Acesso em 15 mar 2022.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2006.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. Being and Time. New York: State University of New York Press, 2010.

ISAAC, Mike. Super Pumped: The Battle for UBER. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019.

JUNGE, Benjamin; TAVARES, Álvaro P. Aguiar . Subjetividades Móveis: sentidos de periferia e percepções da crise entre motoristas de uber em Recife. Dossiê subjetividades periféricas• Novos estud. CEBRAP 39 (1) • Jan-Apr 2020.

KLEN, Bruna. et al (ed.) Do fake ao fato. Vitória: MilFontes, 2020.

LEE, Newton. Facebook Nation: Total Information Awareness. New York: Springler, 2014.

MACKINNON, M. M.; PETRONE, M. Populismo e neopopulismo en America Latina. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1998.

MOFFIT, Benjamin. The Global Rise Of Populism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.

MOFFIT, Benjamin. Populism versus technocracy in: COSSARINI, Paolo et al. (eds.), Populism and Passions, p. 49-64. London: Routledge, 2019.

MORGAN, R.; CLULOW, J. The Proles and Cons of Facebook, in: WITTKOWER, D.E. Facebook and Philosophy, p. 258-9. Chicago: Open Court, 2010.

OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo Perez; PINHA, Daniel. (org.). Tempos de Crise: ensaios de história política. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Autogradia, 2020.

OLIVEIRA, RODRIGO PEREZ. O negacionismo científico olavista: a radicalização de um certo regime epistemológico. In: Valdei Araujo; Mateus Pereira; Bruna Klem. (Org.). Do Fake ao Fato: (Des) atualizando Bolsonaro. 01ed.Vitória, ES: Mil Fontes, 2020, v. 01, p. 71-90.

PAULA, Carolina et al. Bolsonarismo no Brasil. 2021. Disponível em: https://iree.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Pesquisa-Bolsonarismo-no-Brasil.pdf. Acesso em 15 mar 2022.

PEREIRA, LUISA RAUTER. Fissuras do Presentismo: Mudança Histórica nos Protestos Políticos Contemporâneos. TEMPO E ARGUMENTO, v. 13, p. e0301, 2021.

PEREIRA, Mateus. H. F. Lembrança do presente: Ensaios sobre a condição histórica na era da internet. Brasil: Autêntica Editora, 2022..

PEREIRA, Mateus; ARAUJO, Valdei. Vozes sobre Bolsonaro, in: KLEN, Bruna et al (ed.) Do fake ao fato, p. 115-140. Vitória: Milfontes, 2020.

PEREIRA, Mateus; MARQUES, Mayra; ARAUJO, Valdei. Almanaque da Covid-19. Vitória: Milfontes, 2020.

PIMENTA, João Paulo G. et al. A Independência e uma cultura de história no Brasil, Almanack, 8: 5–36, 2014.

RAMALHO, Walderez. Reinterpreting the times of crisis based on the asymmetry between chronos and kairos. História da Historiografia, 14(35): 115-144, 2021.

ROCHA, Camila; SOLANO, Ester ; MEDEIROS, Jonas. The Bolsonaro Paradox. Londres: Springer, 2021.

ROCHA, João César C.. Guerra Cultural e Retórica do Ódio. São Paulo: Caminhos Editora e Livraria, 2021.

TAMAKI, Eduardo Ryo.; FUKS, Mario. Populism in Brazil’s 2018 general elections, Lua Nova, 109: 103-127, 2020.

VALENCIA-GARCÍA, Louie Dean (ed.) Far-Right Revisionism and the End of History: Alt/Histories. New York: Routledge, 2020.

ZUBOFF, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Hachette Book, 2019.

ZÚÑIGA, Homero Gil. Populism in the era of Twitter. New Media & Society, 22(4): 585-594, 2020.

Published

2023-01-17

How to Cite

H. DE FARIA PEREIRA, M.; LOPES DE ARAUJO, V. The past as distraction: Engagements with history in the new Brazilian populism. Revista de Teoria da História, Goiânia, v. 25, n. 2, p. 70–88, 2023. DOI: 10.5216/rth.v25i2.74060. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/74060. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2024.