EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY

EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY

Authors

Keywords:

Controle de constitucionalidade, Devido processo legislativo, Prognose Legislativa, Tribunal Constitucional Federal da Alemanha

Abstract

The judicial review requires, expressly or implicitly, that the legislative process must be based on empirical elements or on evidence that support the prognoses made in them. This requirement tends to be gauged generally through formal conformity judgments, but, as the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany reveals, it is sometimes assessed by forays into factual elements that integrated the deliberative process in the parliamentary sphere. The sub-theorizing of the matter and the democratic criticism of recognizing a judicial jurisdiction of such magnitude have provided judicial intervention without much coherence or predictability. In this article, answers are sought in the jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Bibliographic and documentary research were used in the methodology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Adércio Leite Sampaio, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

Possui graduação em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (1992), mestrado em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (1997), doutorado em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2001) e pós-doutorado pela Universidad de Castilla la Mancha (2018). Atualmente é professor adjunto III da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Professor dos Cursos de Mestrado e Doutorado em Direito da Escola Superior Dom Helder Câmara, na área de concentração "Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável", professor titular da Escola Superior Dom Helder Câmara e Procurador da República do Ministério Público Federal. E-mail: joseadercio.contato@gmail.com. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9452-4811. CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6500803835232465.

References

ALEMANHA. Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional Federal ( “Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz – BverfGG”, 12/3²1951. Disponível em: < https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bverfgg/BJNR002430951.html >. Acesso em 25 mar. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federa BverfGE 86, 148, de 27/5/1992 . Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv086148.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federa. BVerfGE 115, 97, de 18/1/2006. Disponível em: <https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv115097.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE, 128, 1 (Gentechnikgesetz), de 24/11/2010. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv128001.html>. Acesso em 12 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE, 49, 89 (Kalkar I), de 8/8/1978. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv049089.html>. Acesso em 12 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BverfGE 101, 158, 224, 234,de 11/11/1999. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv101158.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 111, 226, de 27/7/2004b. Disponível em:< https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv111226.html>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 111, 333 (Brandenburgisches Hochschulgesetz), de 26/10/2004a. Disponível em: <https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv111333.html>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 155, 135, de 28/1/2014 (Filmabgabe). Disponível em: <https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2014/01/rs20140128_2bvr156112.html>. Acesso em 11 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 35, 79 (Hochschulurteil), de 29/5/1973. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv035079.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 39, 210, de 19/3/1975 (Mühlenstrukturgesetz). Disponível em: <https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv039210.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 50, 290, (Mitbestimmung). julgado em 1/3/1979. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv050290.html>. Acesso em 12 dez. 2019

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 7, 377, julgamento 11/6/1958. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/Dfr/bv007377.html>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 79, 311 (Staatsverschuldung), de 18/4/1989. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv079311.html>. Acesso em 19 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 88, 203 (Schwangerschaftsabbruch II), de 28/5/1993a. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv088203.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE 88, 87(Transsexuelle II), julgamento 26/01/1993b. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv088087.html>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE, 106, 62, de 24/10/2002 (Altenpflegegesetz). Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv106062.html>. Acesso em 11/12/2019.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE, 120, 224 (Geschwisterbeischlaf), de 26/2/2008a. Disponível em: <https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv120224.html>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE, 129, 49 (Mediziner-BAföG), para 65, de 21/7/2011. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv129049.html>. Acesso em 11 fev. 2020.

ALEMANHA. Tribunal Constitucional Federal. BVerfGE, 90, 145 (Cannabis), de 9/3/1994. Disponível em: < https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv090145.html>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.

BICKENBACH, Christian. Legislative Margins of Appreciation as the Result of Rational Lawmaking. In MEßERSCHMID, Klaus;. OLIVER-LALANA, Daniel (eds). Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court. Zurich: Springer, 2016.

BUZBEE, William W.; SCHAPIRO, Robert A. Legislative Record Review. Stanford Law Review, v. 54, n. 1, p. 87-161, 98 n. 31, 2001.

CHENG, Edward K. Independent Judicial Research in the Daubert Age. Duke Law Journal, v.56, p. 1263-1318, 2007.

COENEN, Dan T. A Constitution of Collaboration: Protecting Fundamental Values with Second-Look Rules of Interbranch Dialogue. William and Mary Law Review, v. 42, n. 5, p. 1575-1870, 2001

FLÜCKINGER, Alexandre. Case-law sources for evaluating the impact of legislation: an application of the precautionary principle to fundamental rights. Theory and Practice of Legislation, v. 4, n. 2 (Evidence-based Review of Legislation), p. 263-277, 2016.

FRICKEY; Philip P. Frickey; SMITH, Steve S. Judicial Review, the Congressional Process, and the Federalism Cases: An Interdisciplinary Critique. Yale Law Journal, v. 111, p. 1706-1756, 2002.

GEIGER, WilliI. Gegenwartsprobleme der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit aus deutscher Sicht. in BERBERICH, Thomas; HOLL, Wolfgang; MAAβ Kurt-Jürgen (Hrsg). Neue Entwicklungen im öffentlichen Recht. Berlin; Köln; Mainz: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, p. 131-142, 1979

GUSY, Christoph. Parlamentarischer Gesetzgeber und Bundesverfassungsgericht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985.

KEETON, Robert E. Legislative Facts and Similar Things: Deciding Disputed Premise Facts. Minnesota Law Review, v. 3, p. 1- 22, 1988

KISCHEL, Uwe. Die Begründung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003

LARSEN, Allison O. Confronting Supreme Court Fact Finding. Virginia Law Review, v. 98, p. 1255-1312, 2012.

MEAZELL, Emily H. Scientific Avoidance: Toward More Principled Judicial Review of Legislative Science. Indiana Law Journal, v. 84, n. 1, p. 239- 283 2009.

MENDES, Gilmar F. Controle de constitucionalidade: hermenêutica constitucional e revisão de fatos e prognoses legislativos pelo órgão judicial. Revista Jurídica da Presidência, v. 1, n. 8, 2000. Disponível em: <https://revistajuridica.presidencia.gov.br/index.php/saj/article/viewFile/1063/1047>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2020.

MEßERSCHMIDT, Klaus. Evidence-based review of legislation in Germany. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, v. 4, n. 2, p. 209-235, 2016.

OSSENBÜHL, Fritz. Die Kontrolle von Tatsachenfeststellungen und Prognoseentscheidungen. In STARCK, Christian Bundesverfassungsgericht und Grundgesetz. Festgabe aus Anlaß des 25jährigen Bestehens des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Bd. I (Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1976

OSSENBÜHL, Fritz. Gesetz und Recht - Die Rechtsquellen im demokratischen Rechtsstaat. In ISENSEE, Josef; KRICHHOF, Paul. Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bd. V (Rechtsquelle; Organisation; Finanzen). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Juristischer Verlag, p. 135-181, 2007.

PHILIPPI, Klaus J. Tatsachenfeststellungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Köln: Heymanns, 1971.

ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan; EGIDY, Stefanie; FOWKES, James. Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany, and European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press 2015.

ROSS, Bertrall L., The State as Witness: Windsor, Shelby County, and Judicial Distrust of the Legislative Record. New York University Law Review, v. 89, p. 2027-2105, 2014.

SAUL, Matthew. Structuring evaluations of parliamentary processes by the European Court of Human Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, v. 20, p. 1077-1096, 2016.

SAUL, Matthew. The European Court of Human Rights’ Margin of Appreciation and the Processes of National Parliaments. Human Rights Law Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 745–774, 2015

VERMEULE, Adrian. Judging under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press 2006.

WALDHOFF, Christian. On Constitutional Duties to Give Reasons for Legislative Acts. In MEßERSCHMIDT, Klaus; OLIVER-LALANA, Daniel (eds). Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court., p. 129-151, 2016

ZHANG, Qingbo. Juristische Argumentation durch Folgenorientierung. Bedeutung der juristischen Argumentation für China. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-22

How to Cite

SAMPAIO, J. A. L. EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY: EVIDENCE-BASED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION IN THE CASE LAW OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF GERMANY. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG, Goiânia, v. 47, n. 1, 2023. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/revfd/article/view/68800. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO DA UFG

Section

Artigos Científicos

License

Os Autores que publicam nesta revista concedem à Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG uma licença mundial, sem royalties, sujeita aos termos e condições da Licença Jurídica Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Brasil Creative Commons Attribution License

Os autores concedem à RFD UFG todos os direitos autorais sobre os artigos nela publicados, que os  mantêm com exclusividade até o advento de domínio público sobre os mesmos.