Fiabilidad de los instrumentos de evaluación de la calidad de vida en niños y adolescentes con cicatrices de quemaduras: revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v26.76914Palabras clave:
Quemaduras, Calidad de Vida, Encuestas y CuestionariosResumen
Objetivo: investigar las medidas de confiabilidad de los instrumentos de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) en niños o adolescentes con cicatrices de quemaduras. Métodos: revisión sistemática de la literatura mediante búsqueda en CINAHL, Google Scholar, LILACS, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus y Web of Science, sin restricciones de fecha o idioma de publicación. Se incluyeron estudios originales, en los que se examinaron instrumentos para evaluar la CVRS de niños y/o adolescentes (≤ 18 años) con cicatrices de quemaduras. Se utilizaron los criterios de las directrices de los Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) para analizar las propiedades de medición de los instrumentos de CVRS. Resultados: se incluyeron nueve estudios que abarcaron los siguientes instrumentos: Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) – versión 0-4 años; Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) – versión 5-18 años; Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) – versión 0-menos de 8 años; Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) – version 8-18 años; y CARe Burn Scale (CBS) – versión 0-8 años. Conclusión: el BBSIP fue el instrumento que cumplió con el mayor número de ítems de calidad según el COSMIN.
Descargas
Citas
Pinto ACS, Costa KLN, Almeida Filho PP, Oliveira Júnior JL, Rocha MNS. Evaluation of the epidemiological profile of burned adult patients admitted to a referral center in the interior of the state of Bahia, Brazil. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2022 Jan-Mar;37(1):66-70. https://doi.org/10.5935/21771235.2022RBCP0011
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD Results [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington; 2020 [cited 2022 July 16]. Available from: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/
Willemse H, Geenen R, Egberts MR, Engelhard IM, Van Loey NE. Perceived stigmatization and fear of negative evaluation: two distinct pathways to body image dissatisfaction and self-esteem in burn survivors. Psychol Health. 2021 Apr;38(4):445-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1970160
Ajoudani F, Jasemi M, Lotfi M. Social participation, social support, and body image in the first year of rehabilitation in burn survivors: a longitudinal, three-wave cross-lagged panel analysis using structural equation modeling. Burns. 2018 Aug; 44(5):1141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.018
ter Bogt HJ, Scapens RW. Institutions, situated rationality and agency in management accounting: A research note extending the Burns and Scapens framework. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2019 July;32(6):1801-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2016-2578
Ruidiaz-Gómez KS, Cacante-Caballero JV. Desarrollo histórico del concepto calidad de vida: una revisión de la literatura. Rev Cienc Cuidad. 2021 Sept;18(3):86-99. https://doi.org/10.22463/17949831.2539
Spronk I, Legemate C, Oen I, van Loey N, Polinder S, van Baar M. Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018 May;13(5):e0197507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197507
Woolard A, Hill NTM, McQueen M, Martin L, Milroy H, Wood FM, et al. The psychological impact of paediatric burn injuries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec;21:2281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12296-1
Lerman SF, Sylvester S, Hultman CS, Caffrey JA. Suicidality after burn injuries: a systematic review. J Burn Care Res. 2021 Jan;42(3):357-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irab014
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb;19:539-49 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27:1147-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Legemate CM, Spronk I, Mokkink LB, Middelkoop E, Polinder S, van Baar ME, et al. Evaluation of measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments for burns: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Apr;88(4):555-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002584
Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Phillips CB, Daugherty MB, Hinson M, Jenkins M, et al. American Burn Association/ Shriners Hospitals for Children burn outcomes questionnaire: construction and psychometric properties. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000 Jan-Feb;21(1 Pt 1):29-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-200021010-00007
Simons M, Kimble R, McPhail S, Tyack Z. The longitudinal validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (caregiver report for young children version) for measuring health-related quality of life in children with burn scars. Burns. 2019 Dec; 45(8):1792809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.015
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Riphagen I, et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):313-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9
Meirte J, Tyack Z. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Burn Scar Rehabilitation: A Guide to Implementation and Evaluation. Eur. Burn. J. 2022 Apr 5;3(2):290–308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3020025
Flake JK, Davidson IJ, Wong O, Pek J. Construct validity and the validity of replication studies: a systematic review. Am Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;77(4):576-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001006
Lüthi FT, Mabire C, Amoussou JR, Bernard M, Borasio GD, Ramelet AS. Instruments for the identification of patients in need of palliative care: protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 May;18(5):1144-53. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00146
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 July 21;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 July 16]. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-forPROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf
Mokkink LB, Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2017 May;27(5):1171-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IMMH, Dokter J, Boxma H, Hinson MI, et al. Reliability and validity of the Health Outcomes Burn Questionnaire for infants and children in The Netherlands. Burns. 2006 May;32(3):35765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.10.004
Kazis LE, Liang MH, Lee A, Ren XS, Phillips CB, Hinson M, et al. The development, validation, and testing of a health outcomes burn questionnaire for infants and children 5 years of age and younger: American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 May-Jun;23(3):196-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-200205000-00009
Sveen J, Huss F, Sjöberg F, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the burn outcomes questionnaire for children aged 5 to 18 years. J Burn Care Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):e286-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182331aaa
van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IMMH, Dokter J, Boxma H, Hinson MI, et al. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospital for Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (5-18 years of age). J Burn Care Res. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):790-802. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000245434.76697.56
Arumugam PK, Thayal PK. Validation of Indian Adaptation of Burn Outcomes Questionnaire – Hindi Version (I-BOQHV) for Pediatric Subgroup 5 to 18 years. J Burn Care Res. 2021 May;42(3):473-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa182
Simons M, Kimble R, McPhail S, Tyack Z. The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (child and young person version) for measuring health-related quality of life in children with burn scars: a longitudinal cohort study of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Burns. 2019 Nov;45(7):1537-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.012
Griffiths C, Guest E, Pickles T, Hollèn L, Grzeda M, Tollow P, et al. The development and validation of the CARe Burn Scale: Child Form: a parent-proxy-reported outcome measure assessing quality of life for children aged 8 years and under living with a burn injury. Qual Life Res. 2021 Jan;30(1):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02627-x
Tyack Z, Ziviani J, Kimble R, Plaza A, Jones A, Cuttle L, et al. Measuring the impact of burn scarring on healthrelated quality of life: development and preliminary content validation of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) for children and adults. Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1405-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.021
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951 Sept;16(3):297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Javali SB, Gudaganavar NV, Jain SM. Effect of varying sample size in estimation of coefficients of internal consistency. WebmedCentral. 2011 Feb 23;2(2):WMC001572. https://doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.001572
Guttman L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika. 1945;10(4):255-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288892
Chenani KT, Madadizadeh F. Guideline for selecting types of reliability and suitable intra-class correlation coefficients in clinical research. J Biostat Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;7(3):305-09. https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v7i3.7301
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
