Reliability of quality-of-life assessment instruments in children and adolescents with burn scars: systematic review

Authors

  • Francieli Ferreira de Andrade Batista Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. E-mail: franandradebatista@gmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1472-3624
  • Elisângela Flauzino Zampar Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. E-mail: elisangelaflauzino@hotmail.com.
  • Renne Rodrigues Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. E-mail: renne2r@gmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1390-5901
  • Francisco Xavier de Araújo Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. E-mail: franciscoxaraujo@gmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-4103
  • Maria Elena Echevarría-Guanilo Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. E-mail: elena_meeg@hotmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0505-9258
  • Flavia Meneguetti Pieri Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. E-mail: fpieri@uel.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-2550
  • Rosangela Aparecida Pimenta Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. E-mail: ropimentaferrari@uel.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-7461

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v26.76914

Keywords:

Burns, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

Abstract

Objective: to investigate the reliability measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments in children or adolescents with burn scars. Methods: systematic review of the literature performed through a search in CINAHL, Google Scholar, LILACS, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science without restrictions on the date or language of publication. Original studies were included, in which instruments for assessing the HRQOL of children and/or adolescents (≤ 18 years old) with burn scars were examined. The criteria of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines were used to analyze the measurement properties of HRQOL instruments. Results: nine studies were included, and they covered the following instruments: Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) 0-4 years version; Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) 5-18 years version; Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) 0-under 8 years old version; Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) 8-18 years old version; and CARe Burn Scale (CBS) 0-8 years old. Conclusion: the BBSIP was the instrument that met the greatest number of quality items according to the COSMIN.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pinto ACS, Costa KLN, Almeida Filho PP, Oliveira Júnior JL, Rocha MNS. Evaluation of the epidemiological profile of burned adult patients admitted to a referral center in the interior of the state of Bahia, Brazil. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2022 Jan-Mar;37(1):66-70. https://doi.org/10.5935/21771235.2022RBCP0011

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD Results [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington; 2020 [cited 2022 July 16]. Available from: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/

Willemse H, Geenen R, Egberts MR, Engelhard IM, Van Loey NE. Perceived stigmatization and fear of negative evaluation: two distinct pathways to body image dissatisfaction and self-esteem in burn survivors. Psychol Health. 2021 Apr;38(4):445-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1970160

Ajoudani F, Jasemi M, Lotfi M. Social participation, social support, and body image in the first year of rehabilitation in burn survivors: a longitudinal, three-wave cross-lagged panel analysis using structural equation modeling. Burns. 2018 Aug; 44(5):1141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.018

ter Bogt HJ, Scapens RW. Institutions, situated rationality and agency in management accounting: A research note extending the Burns and Scapens framework. Accounting,

Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2019 July;32(6):1801-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2016-2578

Ruidiaz-Gómez KS, Cacante-Caballero JV. Desarrollo histórico del concepto calidad de vida: una revisión de la literatura. Rev Cienc Cuidad. 2021 Sept;18(3):86-99. https://doi.org/10.22463/17949831.2539

Spronk I, Legemate C, Oen I, van Loey N, Polinder S, van Baar M. Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018 May;13(5):e0197507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197507

Woolard A, Hill NTM, McQueen M, Martin L, Milroy H, Wood FM, et al. The psychological impact of paediatric burn injuries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec;21:2281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12296-1

Lerman SF, Sylvester S, Hultman CS, Caffrey JA. Suicidality after burn injuries: a systematic review. J Burn Care Res. 2021 Jan;42(3):357-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irab014

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010 Feb;19:539-49 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8

Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27:1147-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3

Legemate CM, Spronk I, Mokkink LB, Middelkoop E, Polinder S, van Baar ME, et al. Evaluation of measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments for burns: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Apr;88(4):555-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002584

Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Phillips CB, Daugherty MB, Hinson M, Jenkins M, et al. American Burn Association/ Shriners Hospitals for Children burn outcomes questionnaire: construction and psychometric properties. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000 Jan-Feb;21(1 Pt 1):29-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-200021010-00007

Simons M, Kimble R, McPhail S, Tyack Z. The longitudinal validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (caregiver report for young children version) for measuring health-related quality of life in children with burn scars. Burns. 2019 Dec; 45(8):1792809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.015

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Riphagen I, et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):313-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9451-9

Meirte J, Tyack Z. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Burn Scar Rehabilitation: A Guide to Implementation and Evaluation. Eur. Burn. J. 2022 Apr 5;3(2):290–308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3020025

Flake JK, Davidson IJ, Wong O, Pek J. Construct validity and the validity of replication studies: a systematic review. Am Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;77(4):576-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001006

Lüthi FT, Mabire C, Amoussou JR, Bernard M, Borasio GD, Ramelet AS. Instruments for the identification of patients in need of palliative care: protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 May;18(5):1144-53. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00146

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 July 21;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 July 16]. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-forPROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf

Mokkink LB, Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2017 May;27(5):1171-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4

van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IMMH, Dokter J, Boxma H, Hinson MI, et al. Reliability and validity of the Health Outcomes Burn Questionnaire for infants and children in The Netherlands. Burns. 2006 May;32(3):35765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.10.004

Kazis LE, Liang MH, Lee A, Ren XS, Phillips CB, Hinson M, et al. The development, validation, and testing of a health outcomes burn questionnaire for infants and children 5 years of age and younger: American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 May-Jun;23(3):196-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-200205000-00009

Sveen J, Huss F, Sjöberg F, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the burn outcomes questionnaire for children aged 5 to 18 years. J Burn Care Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):e286-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182331aaa

van Baar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Oen IMMH, Dokter J, Boxma H, Hinson MI, et al. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospital for Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (5-18 years of age). J Burn Care Res. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):790-802. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000245434.76697.56

Arumugam PK, Thayal PK. Validation of Indian Adaptation of Burn Outcomes Questionnaire – Hindi Version (I-BOQHV) for Pediatric Subgroup 5 to 18 years. J Burn Care Res. 2021 May;42(3):473-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa182

Simons M, Kimble R, McPhail S, Tyack Z. The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (child and young person version) for measuring health-related quality of life in children with burn scars: a longitudinal cohort study of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Burns. 2019 Nov;45(7):1537-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.012

Griffiths C, Guest E, Pickles T, Hollèn L, Grzeda M, Tollow P, et al. The development and validation of the CARe Burn Scale: Child Form: a parent-proxy-reported outcome measure assessing quality of life for children aged 8 years and under living with a burn injury. Qual Life Res. 2021 Jan;30(1):239-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02627-x

Tyack Z, Ziviani J, Kimble R, Plaza A, Jones A, Cuttle L, et al. Measuring the impact of burn scarring on healthrelated quality of life: development and preliminary content validation of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) for children and adults. Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1405-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.021

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951 Sept;16(3):297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Javali SB, Gudaganavar NV, Jain SM. Effect of varying sample size in estimation of coefficients of internal consistency. WebmedCentral. 2011 Feb 23;2(2):WMC001572. https://doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.001572

Guttman L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika. 1945;10(4):255-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02288892

Chenani KT, Madadizadeh F. Guideline for selecting types of reliability and suitable intra-class correlation coefficients in clinical research. J Biostat Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;7(3):305-09. https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v7i3.7301

Downloads

Published

2024-07-27

Issue

Vol. 26 (2024)

Section

Review Article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.