Validation of simulated scenarios for nursing students: assessment and treatment of Pressure Ulcers

Authors

  • Liandra Aparecida Cezario Rocha Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil, lrocha@estudante.ufscar.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-8840
  • Bruna Caroline Gorla Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil, brunagorla@estudante.ufscar.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-8873
  • Beatriz Maria Jorge Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso dos Sul (UFMS), Coxim, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil, beatriz_jorge@ufms.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-4691
  • Maria Gabriela Afonso Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil, lmgafonso@estudante.ufscar.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-3446
  • Elaine Cristina Negri Santos Universidade do Oeste Paulista (Unoeste), Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brasil, elainenegrisantos@gmail.com. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8665-1936
  • Fernanda Berchelli Girão Miranda Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil, fernanda.berchelli@ufscar.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7229-0519

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v23.67489

Keywords:

Simulation Technique, Pressure Ulcer, Students, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Nursing Assessment

Abstract

Objective: to validate simulated scenarios for the teaching and learning of nursing students about the assessment and treatment of Pressure Ulcers. Method: methodological study, with scenarios built using Fabri's reference and standards of best practices from the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. The selection of judges followed the Fehring criteria and snowball technique, and data collection took place in two stages according to Delphi. The analysis of the results considered the level of agreement of 0.80. Results: two scenarios have been validated resulting in a global Scale-Level Content Validity Index greater than 0.80; both have items about the learner's prior knowledge, general and specific learning objectives, theoretical foundation, responsible persons, complexity, documentation, briefing, topic, human and material resources, target audience, team training, debriefing, and assessment. Conclusions: the simulated scenarios have been validated for the teaching-learning of nursing students to assess and treat Pressure Ulcers in the hospital and home context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rosa MEC, Pereira-Ávila FMV, Góes FGB, Pereira-Caldeira NMV, Sousa LRM, Goulart MCL. Aspectos positivos e negativos da simulação clínica no ensino de enfermagem. Esc. Anna Nery [Internet]. 2020 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];24(3):e20190353. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2019-0353.

Mazzo A, Miranda FBG, Meska MHG, Bianchini A, Bernardes RM, Pereira Junior GA. Teaching of pressure injury prevention and treatment using simulation. Esc. Anna Nery [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];22(1):e20170182. Disponível em:: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0182.

INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM Simulation Design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2016 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];12 (supl.):S5-S12. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005.

Fabri RP, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Fonseca AS, Pedersoli CE, Miranda FBG et al. Development of a theoretical-practical script for clinical simulation. Rev. esc. enferm. USP [Internet]. 2017 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];51:e03218. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016016403218.

Kaneko RMU, Lopes MHBM. Realistic health care simulation scenario: what is relevant for its design? Rev. esc. enferm. USP [Internet]. 2019 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021] ;53:e03453. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018015703453.

National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Emily Haesler (Ed.). Cambridge Media: Osborne Park, Australia; 2014 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021]. Disponível em: https://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/portuguese-quick-reference-guide-jan2016.pdf.

Ferraz APCM, Belhot RV. Taxonomia de Bloom: revisão teórica e apresentação das adequações do instrumento para definição de objetivos instrucionais. Gest. Prod. [Internet]. 2010 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];17(2):421-31. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2010000200015.

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevenção e tratamento de úlceras / lesões por pressão: guia de consulta rápida [Internet]. (edição em português brasileiro). Haesler E, editora. Wijma M, tradutora. Praga: EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA; 2019 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021]. Disponível em: https://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/qrg-2020-brazilian-portuguese.pdf.

Associação Brasileira de Estomaterapia: estomias, feridas e incontinência (SOBEST) e Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem em Dermatologia (SOBENDE). Classificação das lesões por pressão: consenso NPUAP 2016 – adaptada culturalmente para o Brasil. São Paulo: SOBEST; 2016 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021]. Disponível em: http://www.sobest.org.br/textod/35.

Fehring R. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung [Internet]. 1987 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];16(6 pt1):625-29. Disponível em: https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=nursing_fac.

Polit DF, Beck CT, Hungler BP. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização. 6ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011.

Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health [Internet]. 1997 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];20(3):269-74. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3%3C269::aid-nur9%3E3.0.co;2-g.

Regis CF. Construção e validação de instrumento para avaliação de habilidades clínicas dos estudantes de graduação na simulação realística em atendimento pré-hospitalar [Dissertação na Internet]. [Recife]: Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde; 2019 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021]. Disponível em: http://repositorio.fps.edu.br/handle/4861/189.

Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res [Internet]. 1986 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];35(6):382-85. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.

Scarparo AF, Laus AM, Azevedo ALCS, Freitas MRI, Gabriel CS, Chaves LDP. Reflexões sobre o uso da técnica delphi em pesquisas na enfermagem. Rev RENE [Internet]. 2012 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021]13(1):242-51. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/3803.

Pieper B, Mott M. Nurses’ knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention, stating, and description. Adv Wound Care [Internet]. 1995 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];8(3):34-48. Disponível em: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/7795877.

Baptista RCN, Martins JCA, Pereira MFCR, Mazzo A. Students' satisfaction with simulated clinical experiences: validation of an assessment scale. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2014 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];22(5):709-15. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3295.2471.

Almeida RGS, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Baptista RCN, Girão FB, Mendes IAC. Validation to Portuguese of the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning. Rev Latino Am Enferm [Internet]. 2015 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];23(6):1007-13. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0472.2643.

Offiah G, Ekpotu LP, Murphy S, Kane D, Gordon A, O’Sullivan M et.al. Evaluation of medical student retention of clinical skills following simulation training. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2019 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];19:263. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1663-2.

Lavoie P, Micahud C, Belisle M, Boyer L, Gosslein E, Grondin M et al. Learning theories and tools for the assessment of core nursing competencies in simulation: a theoretical review. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];74(2):239-50. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13416.

Silva JLG, Oliveira-Kumakura ARS. Clinical simulation to teach nursing care for wounded patients. Rev. Bras. Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];71(Suppl 4):1785-90. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0170.

INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM Simulation-Enhanced Interprofessional Education (Sim-IPE). Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2016 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];12 (supl.):S34-S8. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.011.

Souza RS, Oliveira PP, Dias AAL, SDAS, Pelizari AEB, Figueiredo RM. Prevention of infections associated with peripheral catheters: construction and validation of clinical scenario. Rev. Bras. Enferm [Internet]. 2020 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];73(5):e20190390. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0390.

Meakim C, Boese T, Decker S. Franklin AE, Gloe D, Lioce L, et. al. Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard I: Terminology. Clin Simul Nurs [Internet]. 2013 [cited 20 nov 2020];9(6S),S3-11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001.

Stokes-Parish JB, Duvivier R, Jolly B. Does Appearance Matter? Current Issues and Formulation of a Research Agenda for Moulage in Simulation. Simul Healthc [Internet]. 2017 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];12(1):47-50. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000211.

Diamond S, Middleton A, Mather R. A cross‐faculty simulation model for authentic learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International [Internet]. 2011 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];48(1),25-35. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.518423.

Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing society for simulation in healthcare. Simul Healthc [Internet]. 2015 [acesso em: 01 jul. 2021];10(2):106-15. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-21

Issue

Vol. 23 (2021)

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.