Validity and reliability of the dimensional assessment scale after myocardial infarction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v22.55886Keywords:
Quality of Life, Myocardial Infarction, Validation Studies, Cardiovascular DiseasesAbstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence of reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Quality of Life Assessment Scale in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Methodological study. Reliability was verified using internal consistency analysis and test-retest (Cronbach’s α). Reproducibility was verified with intra- and inter-examiner assessment. The validity of the instrument was calculated using construct and criterion validity through convergent and concurrent validity. The sample consisted of 83 patients, of which 51 were hospitalized and 32 were receiving outpatient care. All the domains showed a significant correlation with overall score. The Multidimensional Quality of Life Assessment Scale showed evidence of validity and reliability compared to the SF-36 questionnaire, with a correlation of 0.89 (p<0.01). Cronbach’s alpha for the inpatients and outpatients was 0.85 and 0.83, respectively. The instrument shows evidence of reliability and validity for application in outpatient and hospital settings in Brazil.
Downloads
References
Ranjandish F, Mahmoodi H, Shaghaghi A. Psychometric responsiveness of the health-related quality of life questionnaire (HeartQoL-P) in the Iranian post-myocardial infarction patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2019 [acesso em: 19 mar. 2019];17(10). Disponível em: https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-018-1075-8#citeas. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1075-8.
Stevens B, Pezzullo L, Verdian L, Tomlinson J, George A, Bacal F. The economic burden of heart conditions in Brazil. Arq Bras Cardiol [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 19 mar. 2019];111(1):29-36. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001300029. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180104.
Arnold SV, Smolderen KG, Kennedy KF, Li Y, Shore S, Stolker JM, et al. Risk factors for rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes and unplanned revascularization following acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc [Internet]. 2015 [acesso em: 02 set. 2017];4(2):e001352. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345868/. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001352.
Francis T, Kabboul N, Rac V., et al. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a metaanalysis. Can J Cardiol [Internet]. 2019 [acesso em: 29 maio 2020];35(3):352-64. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30825955/. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.11.013.
Lidell E, Höfer S, Saner H, Perk J, Hildingh C, Oldridge N. Health-related quality of life in European women following myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs [Internet]. 2015 [acesso em: 02 set. 2017];14(4):326-33. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24821717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474515114535330.
Fiorin BH. Evidências de validade e confiabilidade da escala de avaliação multidimensional – MIDAS em pacientes após infarto agudo [tese de doutorado]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2016.
Fiorin BH, Oliveira ERA, Moreira RSL, Luna FB. Adaptação transcultural do Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) para a língua portuguesa brasileira. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2018;23(3):785-3. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018233.08332017.
Bohmer E; Kristiansen IS; Arnesen H; Halvorsen S. Health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction, does choice of method make a difference? Scand Cardiovasc J. 2014;48(4):216-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2014.923581.
Agathão BT, Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde de adolescentes escolares. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 19 mar. 2019];23(2):659-68. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1413-81232018000200659&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018232.27572016.
Pilatti LA, Pedroso B, Gutierrez GL. Propriedades psicométricas de instrumentos de avaliação: um debate necessário. RBECT. 2010;3(1):81-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3895/S1982-873X2010000100005.
Thompson DR, Watson R. Mokken scaling of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS). J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2011 [acesso em: 04 set. 2017];17(1):156-9. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20831664/. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01415.x.
Oliveira F, Kuznier TP, Souza CC, Chianca TCM. Aspectos teóricos e metodológicos para adaptação cultural e validação de instrumentos na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 08 fev. 2020];27(2):e4900016. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v27n2/0104-0707-tce-27-02-e4900016.pdf. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180004900016.
World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva: WHO; 1998.
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Crosscultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 1993 [acesso em: 28 ago. 2017];46(12):1417-32. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8263569/. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine [Internet]. 2000 [acesso em: 29 ago. 2017];25(24):3186-91. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11124735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemological measurement instruments. Rev Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2007 [acesso em: 19 maio 2020];41(4):665-73. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102007000400024&lng=en. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006005000035.
Reis PAM, Carvalho ZMF, Darder JJT, Oriá MOB, Studart RMB, Maniva SJCF. Adaptação transcultural do Quality of Life Index Spinal Cord Injury – Version III. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(3):403-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000300007.
Fortes CPDD, Araújo APQC. Check list para tradução e adaptação transcultural de questionários em saúde. Cad Saúde Coletiva [Internet]. 2019 [acesso em: 08 fev. 2020];27(2):202-09. https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-462X2019000200202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x201900020002.
Machado RS, Fernandes ADBF, Oliveira ALCB, Soares LS, Gouveia MTO, Silva GRF. Métodos de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos na área da enfermagem. Rev Gaúcha Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em: 08 fev. 2020];39:e2017-0164. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1983-14472018000100501&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0164.
Hardouin JB, Bonnaud-Antignac A, Sébille V. Nonparametric item response theory using Stata. The Stata Journal [Internet]. 2011 [acesso em: 17 ago. 2017]; 11(1):30-51. Disponível em: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/166263/2/sjart_st0216.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1101100102.
Fiorin BH, Oliveira ERA, Moreira RSL, Filho BL. Adaptação transcultural: uma revisão sistemática do método. Revista CPAQV. 2019;11(1):23-9. https://doi.org/10.36692/cpaqv-v11n1-13.
Alwin D. Margins of error: a study of reliability in survey measurement. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Rupp AA, Templin J, Henson RA. Diagnostic measurement: theory, methods, and applications. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010.
Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling [Internet]. 2014 [acesso em: 20 ago. 2017];21:495-508. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
