RIO 2016 GAMES'S SCHEDULE: TERMS AND TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

Authors

  • Pedro Athayde Universidade de Brasília
  • Fernando Mascarenhas Universidade de Brasília
  • Wagner Barbosa Matias Universidade de Brasília
  • Natália Nascimento Miranda Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rpp.v16i3.19270

Keywords:

Public policy, Public Agenda, Sports, Olympics

Abstract

The training schedule comprises a turning point in public policy formulation, defining objects of government intervention. In this sense, we analyzed the terms and themes that go through the scheduling of 2016 Games. The research was based on documentary survey constructed from institutional sources and printed media, discussed with technical support in the content analysis. Allowed to map the interests which permeated Rio bid to host the Olympics, to identify trends in Brazilian sports policy and discuss the public-private relationship in the context of organizing the Games, as well as identifying challenges for the research agenda on sports mega-events.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pedro Athayde, Universidade de Brasília

Doutorando em Política Social da Universidade de Brasília.

Fernando Mascarenhas, Universidade de Brasília

Professor Doutor da Universidade de Brasília.

Wagner Barbosa Matias, Universidade de Brasília

Mestrando em Educação Física da Universidade de Brasília.

Natália Nascimento Miranda, Universidade de Brasília

Acadêmica de Educação Física e Bolsista de Iniciação Científica da Universidade de Brasília.

Published

2013-09-30

How to Cite

ATHAYDE, P.; MASCARENHAS, F.; MATIAS, W. B.; MIRANDA, N. N. RIO 2016 GAMES’S SCHEDULE: TERMS AND TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION. Pensar a Prática, Goiânia, v. 16, n. 3, 2013. DOI: 10.5216/rpp.v16i3.19270. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/fef/article/view/19270. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais