The individual’s invention: For a study of cultural sociology of self
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/ci.v21i2.54622Palavras-chave:
Consciência tribal, Culto do indivíduo, Individualismo icônico, Intersubjetividade, Políticas culturaisResumo
This paper aims to frame a few ideas and concerns about the way western societies in general during modernity times, have been handled through multicultural theories and public policies, the issue of cultural diversity, and especially those ones dealing with the interaction among different cultural groups. We assume that the different forms in which public policies are back up in a theoretical level, by then built and applied to different cultural communities (materialistic level) represent and reflect an ontological conception of culture (symbolic level) based in the belief of the existence of an autonomous, conscientious and rational individual moral subject. We argue that today, these policies are the last political crystallization of this “cult of the individual” that has been shaping over the last two centuries a system of beliefs about the human social being and group relations. This is a soteriological logic of the projection whose origins are of dramatic character (morality of good or bad). This has to do with what here is called the sociology of Self, which means analyse the implications of a system of beliefs based on the cult of the individual on scientific reasoning and forms of political organization of society, and how the interaction structures result as the meaning of action and experience for people and human group: in other words, it is about the production of social meaning. I used the metaphor of Tribal awareness as the main notion of this approach. It is a vitalism of tragic existential origin, which is the nodal point of philosophy in Nietzsche. From a cultural sociological approach of imaginary this would mean investigating the collective effects of a system of beliefs that sacralised the human being as individualistic entity, and considering the effects of collective meanings when the individual becomes a cultural icon with a historical global scope.
Downloads
Referências
ALEXANDER, J. and SMITH P. The meanings of Social Life. A cultural sociology. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2003.
ALEXANDER, J. C. The civil Sphere. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2006.
ANDERSON, B. Imagined Communities: Re?ections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.
BENHABIB, S. La revendicazione dell’identità culturale. Eguaglianza e diversità dell’era globale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2005.
BERSTEIN R. Dictatorship of virtue: Multiculturalism and battle for America’s future. New York: Knopf, 1994.
BOUDON, R. Dictionnaire critique de la sociologie. Paris: PUF, 1982.
BIRNBAUM, P. and LECA, J. (Dir.), Sur L’individualisme. Théories et méthodes. Paris: PFNSP, 1991.
CAILLE, A. “Reconnaissance et sociologie” : In CAILLE, Allain (sous dir de). La quête de reconnaissance. Paris: La Découverte, MAUSS, Coll., 2007.
DELUMEAU, Historia del Paraíso. El jardín de las delicias. Barcelona: Taurus ,2005
DUMONT, L. Essais sur l’individualisme. Une perspective anthropologique sur l’idéologie modern. Paris : Seuil, 1983.
EHRENBERG, A. Le culte de la performance. Paris : Pluriel, 1991.
_______________ L'individu incertain. Paris : Pluriel, 1995.
FLAPE, 2005
GAUCHET, M. La religion dans la démocratie. Parcours de la laïcité. Paris : Gallimard, 1998.
GEERTZ, C. Antropología interpretativa. Argentina: Siglo XXI, 1988.
GEERTZ, C. Mundo Global, mundo local. Argentina: Siglo XXI, 1999.
GITLIN, T. The Twilight of common dreams: why America is wracked by culture wars. New York: H. Holt, 1995.
GRASSI, V., Introduction á la sociologie de l’imaginaire. Paris : Érès, 2008,
GUTIÉRREZ-MARTÍNEZ, D. Revisitar la etnicidad. Miradas cruzadas en torno a la diversidad. México, Siglo XXI editor, 2008.
HEIDEGGER, 1972
HÉNAFF, M. Le Prix de la verité. Le don, l’argent, la philosophie. Paris : Seuil, 2002.
JULLIEN, F. De l’universel, de l’informe, du commun et du dialogue entre cultures. Paris : Fayard, 2008.
KYMLICKA, W. La citoyenneté multiculturelle. La Découverte: Paris, 2001.
KYMLICKA, W. and MESURE S. (Dir). Les identitiés culturelles, Comprendre. No.1, Paris : PUF, 2000.
LASCH, C. The culture of Narcissism. New York: Norton, 1979.
LEPENIENS, W. La traducibilità delle culture, in Intersezioni, XIV, April, 1994, 5-19.
LIPOVETSKY, G. L’ère du vide. Paris : Gallimard, 1983.
___________________. “Individualisme”, Guide Républicain, Paris : Delgrave, 2004.
LOTMAN, Y. The universe of Mind. London: Tauris, 1990.
MAFFESOLI, M. El tiempo de las tribus. El ocaso del individualismo en las sociedades posmodernas, México: Siglo XXI editores, 2004.
_____________, En el crisol de las apariencias. Para una ética de la estética. México: Siglo XXI, 2007.
MARTUCCELLI, D. Sociologies de la modernité. Paris : Folio, Essais, 1999.
MAUSS, M. Essai sur le don, in Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF, 1924.
MEAD, G. H. What social object must psychology presuppose? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7, (7), 1910, 174-180.
MEYEROWITZ J and Maguire J., Media Place and Multiculturalism in Society, July, 1993.
PALANTE, G. La sensibilité individualiste. Paris: Folle Avoine, 1992.
PAREKH, B. Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
POPPER, K. La société ouverte et ses ennemis. Paris: Seuil, 1979.
RENAUT, Al. and S. Mesure. Alter Ego. Les paradoxes de l’identité démocratique. Paris: Flammarion, 2002.
ROMERO C.G., “Pluralismo, Multiculturalismo e Onterculturalidad, In educación y future, No. 8, 2003.
SANDKÜHLER H.J., “Sapere pluralismo e dirito” in Finelli R, Fistetti F., Globalizzazzione e diritti future. Roma: Menifestolibri, 2004.
SARTRE J. P. Huis Clos, Paris Gallimard, 1947.
SENNETT R. Les Tyrannies de l’intimité. Paris: Seuil, 1979.
TAYLOR C. Multiculturalisme. Différence et démocratie. Paris: Aubier, 1994.
TERDIMAN, R. “The politics of Political Correctness”: In C. Newfield and R Stricland (dir.). After Political Correctness, Boulder Westview, 1995, 238-252.
VAN METER, K. Sociologie, Paris: Larousse, 1992.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores dos trabalhos publicados na revista Comunicação e Informação retêm os direitos autorais sem restrições e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultâneo licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho para fins não comerciais com reconhecimento da autoria e o privilégio de publicação primeiramente por esta revista. Caso o texto venha a ser publicado posteriormente em outro veículo, solicita-se aos autores informar que o mesmo foi originalmente publicado como artigo na revista Perspectiva, bem como citar as referências bibliográficas completas dessa publicação.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos pertencem aos autores e o conteúdo dos artigos assinados é de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com o intuito de manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
A revista também se reserva o direito de traduzir o artigo, no todo ou em parte, para o inglês ou para o português, dependendo do idioma em que o artigo tenha sido escrito originalmente.
