The individual’s invention: For a study of cultural sociology of self

Autores

  • Daniel Gutiérrez Martínez Professor Visitante do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Faculdade de Comunicação e Informação da Universidade Federal de Goiás

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/ci.v21i2.54622

Palavras-chave:

Consciência tribal, Culto do indivíduo, Individualismo icônico, Intersubjetividade, Políticas culturais

Resumo

This paper aims to frame a few ideas and concerns about the way western societies in general during modernity times, have been handled through multicultural theories and public policies, the issue of cultural diversity, and especially those ones dealing with the interaction among different cultural groups. We assume that the different forms in which public policies are back up in a theoretical level, by then built and applied to different cultural communities (materialistic level) represent and reflect an ontological conception of culture (symbolic level) based in the belief of the existence of an autonomous, conscientious and rational individual moral subject. We argue that today, these policies are the last political crystallization of this “cult of the individual” that has been shaping over the last two centuries a system of beliefs about the human social being and group relations. This is a soteriological logic of the projection whose origins are of dramatic character (morality of good or bad). This has to do with what here is called the sociology of Self, which means analyse the implications of a system of beliefs based on the cult of the individual on scientific reasoning and forms of political organization of society, and how the interaction structures result as the meaning of action and experience for people and human group: in other words, it is about the production of social meaning. I used the metaphor of Tribal awareness as the main notion of this approach. It is a vitalism of tragic existential origin, which is the nodal point of philosophy in Nietzsche. From a cultural sociological approach of imaginary this would mean investigating the collective effects of a system of beliefs that sacralised the human being as individualistic entity, and considering the effects of collective meanings when the individual becomes a cultural icon with a historical global scope.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Daniel Gutiérrez Martínez, Professor Visitante do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Faculdade de Comunicação e Informação da Universidade Federal de Goiás

Pós-doutor em Ciências Sociais pela Sorbonne (França) e pela Unisinos, doutor em Comunicação Social pela PUCRS e mestre em Ciências da Comunicação pela USP. Pesquisador do Grupo de Estudos sobre Comunicação e Imaginário Imaginalis (CNPq/UFRGS) e do Centro de Estudos sobre o Atual e o Cotidiano (CEAQ/Sorbonne). Autor de "Truffaut, o homem que amava o cinema" (Canoas: Ed. da Ulbra, 2013) e tradutor de "Sociologia do imaginário" (Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2016, 2a. ed.), de Patrick Legros et alii.

Referências

ALEXANDER, J. and SMITH P. The meanings of Social Life. A cultural sociology. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2003.

ALEXANDER, J. C. The civil Sphere. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2006.

ANDERSON, B. Imagined Communities: Re?ections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.

BENHABIB, S. La revendicazione dell’identità culturale. Eguaglianza e diversità dell’era globale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2005.

BERSTEIN R. Dictatorship of virtue: Multiculturalism and battle for America’s future. New York: Knopf, 1994.

BOUDON, R. Dictionnaire critique de la sociologie. Paris: PUF, 1982.

BIRNBAUM, P. and LECA, J. (Dir.), Sur L’individualisme. Théories et méthodes. Paris: PFNSP, 1991.

CAILLE, A. “Reconnaissance et sociologie” : In CAILLE, Allain (sous dir de). La quête de reconnaissance. Paris: La Découverte, MAUSS, Coll., 2007.

DELUMEAU, Historia del Paraíso. El jardín de las delicias. Barcelona: Taurus ,2005

DUMONT, L. Essais sur l’individualisme. Une perspective anthropologique sur l’idéologie modern. Paris : Seuil, 1983.

EHRENBERG, A. Le culte de la performance. Paris : Pluriel, 1991.

_______________ L'individu incertain. Paris : Pluriel, 1995.

FLAPE, 2005

GAUCHET, M. La religion dans la démocratie. Parcours de la laïcité. Paris : Gallimard, 1998.

GEERTZ, C. Antropología interpretativa. Argentina: Siglo XXI, 1988.

GEERTZ, C. Mundo Global, mundo local. Argentina: Siglo XXI, 1999.

GITLIN, T. The Twilight of common dreams: why America is wracked by culture wars. New York: H. Holt, 1995.

GRASSI, V., Introduction á la sociologie de l’imaginaire. Paris : Érès, 2008,

GUTIÉRREZ-MARTÍNEZ, D. Revisitar la etnicidad. Miradas cruzadas en torno a la diversidad. México, Siglo XXI editor, 2008.

HEIDEGGER, 1972

HÉNAFF, M. Le Prix de la verité. Le don, l’argent, la philosophie. Paris : Seuil, 2002.

JULLIEN, F. De l’universel, de l’informe, du commun et du dialogue entre cultures. Paris : Fayard, 2008.

KYMLICKA, W. La citoyenneté multiculturelle. La Découverte: Paris, 2001.

KYMLICKA, W. and MESURE S. (Dir). Les identitiés culturelles, Comprendre. No.1, Paris : PUF, 2000.

LASCH, C. The culture of Narcissism. New York: Norton, 1979.

LEPENIENS, W. La traducibilità delle culture, in Intersezioni, XIV, April, 1994, 5-19.

LIPOVETSKY, G. L’ère du vide. Paris : Gallimard, 1983.

___________________. “Individualisme”, Guide Républicain, Paris : Delgrave, 2004.

LOTMAN, Y. The universe of Mind. London: Tauris, 1990.

MAFFESOLI, M. El tiempo de las tribus. El ocaso del individualismo en las sociedades posmodernas, México: Siglo XXI editores, 2004.

_____________, En el crisol de las apariencias. Para una ética de la estética. México: Siglo XXI, 2007.

MARTUCCELLI, D. Sociologies de la modernité. Paris : Folio, Essais, 1999.

MAUSS, M. Essai sur le don, in Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF, 1924.

MEAD, G. H. What social object must psychology presuppose? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7, (7), 1910, 174-180.

MEYEROWITZ J and Maguire J., Media Place and Multiculturalism in Society, July, 1993.

PALANTE, G. La sensibilité individualiste. Paris: Folle Avoine, 1992.

PAREKH, B. Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

POPPER, K. La société ouverte et ses ennemis. Paris: Seuil, 1979.

RENAUT, Al. and S. Mesure. Alter Ego. Les paradoxes de l’identité démocratique. Paris: Flammarion, 2002.

ROMERO C.G., “Pluralismo, Multiculturalismo e Onterculturalidad, In educación y future, No. 8, 2003.

SANDKÜHLER H.J., “Sapere pluralismo e dirito” in Finelli R, Fistetti F., Globalizzazzione e diritti future. Roma: Menifestolibri, 2004.

SARTRE J. P. Huis Clos, Paris Gallimard, 1947.

SENNETT R. Les Tyrannies de l’intimité. Paris: Seuil, 1979.

TAYLOR C. Multiculturalisme. Différence et démocratie. Paris: Aubier, 1994.

TERDIMAN, R. “The politics of Political Correctness”: In C. Newfield and R Stricland (dir.). After Political Correctness, Boulder Westview, 1995, 238-252.

VAN METER, K. Sociologie, Paris: Larousse, 1992.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-10-30

Como Citar

MARTÍNEZ, D. G. The individual’s invention: For a study of cultural sociology of self. Comunicação & Informação, Goiânia, Goiás, v. 21, n. 2, p. 87–123, 2018. DOI: 10.5216/ci.v21i2.54622. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/ci/article/view/54622. Acesso em: 9 ago. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos