Quentin Skinner e a história das ideias políticas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rth.v25i2.72044Palavras-chave:
Ideias políticas, História das ideias, MetodologiaResumo
O objetivo deste artigo é fazer um balanço crítico da proposta metodológica de Quentin Skinner, com base no contexto linguístico, para a interpretação de escritos políticos do passado. Num primeiro momento, são apresentadas as justificativas e características da metodologia proposta, cuja principal diretriz é reconstituir o contexto discursivo no qual o texto se inscreve, as convenções linguísticas que regem o tratamento dos temas abordados e a intenção de seu autor ao escrevê-lo. Em seguida, são analisadas as principais objeções ao contextualismo linguístico de Skinner e as respostas dadas aos seus críticos. Por fim, é discutida a relevância da metodologia proposta para a compreensão das ideias políticas de autores do passado.
Referências
AUSTIN, John. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
BARROS, Alberto. Quentin Skinner e a liberdade republicana em Maquiavel. Discurso, v.45, p.187 – 206, 2015.
BERLIN, Isaiah. Two Concepts of Liberty. In: BERLIN, Isaiah. Four Essay on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969. p. 118-172.
BEVIR, Mark. The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism. History and Theory, v. 31, p. 267-98, 1992.
BOUCHE, David. Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas. Dordrecht: Martius Nijhoff, 1985.
COLLINGWOOD, Robin. A Ideia de História. Lisboa: Editorial Presença, 1981.
DUNN, John. The Identity of the History of Ideas. Philosophy, v. XLIII, n. 134, p. 85-104, 1968.
FEMIA, Joseph. An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for Studying of Ideas. In: TULLY, John (ed). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 156-175.
FERES Jr., João. De Cambridge para o Mundo, Historicamente: Revendo a Contribuição Metodológica de Quentin Skinner. Dados: Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 48, n. 3, p. 655-680, 2005.
GAUTIER, Claude. Texte, contexte et intention illocutoire de l’auteur. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, n.42, p. 175-192, 2004.
GRAFTON, Anthony. The History of Ideas: Precept and Practice. Journal of the History of Ideas, v. 67, n. 1, p. 1-32, 2006.
GRAHAM, Keith. How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain? In: TULLY, John (ed). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 147-155.
GUNNELL, John. Interpretation and the History of Political Theory: Apology and Epistemology. American Political Science Review, v. 76, p. 317-327, 1982.
HARLAN, David. Intellectual History and the Return of Literature. The American Historical Review, v. 94, n.3, p. 581-609, 1989.
HOLLIS, Martin. Say it with Flowers. In: TULLY, John (ed). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 135-146.
JASMIN, Marcelo. História dos Conceitos e Teoria Política e Social: referências preliminares. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 20, n. 57, p. 27-38, 2005.
JAUME, Lucien. De la Philosophie Politique et de son usage dans L’Histoire des Idées Politiques. Le Banquet, v. 1, n. 17, p.1-7, 2002.
KEANE, John. More Theses on the Philosophy of History. In: TULLY, John (ed). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 204-217.
KOSELLECK, R. Futuro passado: contribuição à semântica dos tempos históricos. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2006.
LAMB, Robert. Quentin Skinner’s revised historical contextualism: a critique. History of the Human Sciences, v. 22, p. 51-73, 2009.
LANE, Melissa. Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s Genealogical Turn. Journal of the History of Ideas, v.73, n.1, p. 71-82, 2012.
LESLIE, M. In Defense of Anachronism. Political Studies, v.18, p. 433–47, 1970.
LOCYER, Andrew. Traditions as Context in the History or Political Thought. Political Studies, v. 2, p. 201-217, 1979.
LOVEJOY, Arthur. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge (USA): Harvard University Press, 1936.
LOVEJOY, Arthur. The Historiography of Ideas. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, v. 78, n. 4, p. 529-543, 1938.
MINOGUE, Kenneth. Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s Foundations. In: TULLY, John (ed). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 176-193.
MULLIGAN, Lotte. Intentions and Conventions: a critique of Quentin Skinner’s method for the study of the history of ideas. Political Studies, v. 27, p.84-98, 1979.
PALONEN, Kari. The history of concepts as a style of political theorizing: Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck’s subversion of normative political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, v.1, n. 1, p. 91-106, 2002.
PALTI, Elias. From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual History and the Complex Fabric of Language. History and Theory, v. 49, p. 194-211, 2010.
PALTI, Elias. The ‘Theoretical Revolution’ in Intellectual History: from the History of Political Ideas to the History of Political Languages. History and Theory, v.53, p. 387-405, 2014.
PAREKH, Bhikhu; Berki, Robert Nando. History of Political Ideas: A Critique of Q. Skinner’s Methodology. Journal of the History of ideas, vol. 34, p. 163-84, 1973.
PERREAU-SAUSSINE, Émile. Quentin Skinner in Context. The Review of Politics. v. 69, n.1, p. 106-122, 2007.
POCOCK, John. Quentin Skinner: the history of politics and the politics of history. Common Knowledge, v. 10, n. 3, p. 532-550, 2004.
POCOCK, John. The history of political thought: a methodological inquiry. In: POCOCK, John. Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 3-19.
RICOUER, Paul. The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text. New Literary History, v. 5, n. 1, p. 91 – 117, 1973.
ROGERS, Melvin L. Republican confusion and liberal clarification. Philosophy and Social Criticism, v.34, n.7, p. 799-782, 2008.
RORTY, Richard (org). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
SEIDMAN, Steven. Beyond Presentism and Historicism: Understanding the History of Social Sciences. Sociological Inquiry, v. 53, n. 1, p. 77-94, 1983.
SHAPIRO, Ian. Realism in the Study of the History of Ideas. History of Political Thought, v. 3, p. 535-578, 1982.
SILVA, Ricardo. História Intelectual e Teoria Política. Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 17, n. 34, p. 301-318, 2009.
SILVA, Ricardo. O Contextualismo Linguístico na História do Pensamento Político: Quentin Skinner e o Debate Metodológico Contemporâneo. Dados: Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 53, n. 2, p. 299-335, 2010.
SILVA, Ricardo. Da história do pensamento político à teoria política histórica: variações da hermenêutica do conflito de Quentin Skinner. Lua Nova, n.102, p. 137-171, 2017.
SKINNER, Quentin. The Limits of Historical Explanations. The Royal Institute of Philosophy, v. 41, n. 157, p. 199-215, 1966.
SKINNER, Quentin. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, v. 8, n. 3, p. 3-53,1969.
SKINNER, Quentin. Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts. The Philosophical Quarterly, v. 20, n. 79, p. 118-138, 1970.
SKINNER, Quentin. On performing and explaining linguistic actions. The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 21, n. 82, p. 1-21, 1971.
SKINNER, Quentin. Motives, Intentions and the Interpretations of Texts. New Literary History, n.3, p. 393-408, 1972a.
SKINNER, Quentin. Social meaning and the explanation of social action. In LASLETT, Peter (ed). Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972b. p. 136-157.
SKINNER, Quentin. Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action. Political Theory, n. 2, p. 277-303, 1974.
SKINNER, Quentin. Action and context. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 52, p. 57-69, 1978.
SKINNER, Quentin. The idea of cultural lexicon. Essays in Criticism, n. 29, p. 205-224, 1979.
SKINNER, Quentin. Machiavelli on the Maintenance of Liberty. Politcs, v.18, n.2, p.3-15, 1983.
SKINNER, Quentin. The idea of negative liberty: philosophical and historical perspectives. In: RORTY, R (ed). Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984a. p.193-221.
SKINNER, Quentin. Paradoxes of Political Liberty. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, p. 227-250, 1984b.
SKINNER, Quentin. A reply to my critics. In: TULLY, John (ed). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 231-288.
SKINNER, Quentin. The republican ideal of political liberty. In: Bock, Gisela (ed.) Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990a. p. 293-309.
SKINNER, Quentin. Thomas Hobbes and the Proper Signification of Liberty. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, v. 40, p.121-151,1990b.
SKINNER, Quentin. Liberdade antes do liberalismo. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 1998.
SKINNER, Quentin. Rhetoric and Conceptual Change. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, v. 3, p. 60-73, 1999.
SKINNER, Quentin. Visions of Politics I: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002a.
SKINNER, Quentin. A Third Concept of Liberty. The British Academy's inaugural Isaiah Berlin Lecture. Prodeedings of the Bristish Academy, n.117, p.237-268, 2002b.
SKINNER, Quentin. From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
SCHOCHET, Gordon. Quentin Skinner’s Method. Political Theory, v. 2, n. 3, p. 261-76, 1974.
TARLTON, C. D. Historicity, Meaning and Revisionism in the Study of Political Thought. History and Theory, v. 12, p. 309-28, 1973.
TERCHEK, R. Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties. London: Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 1997.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Investigações Filosóficas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1994.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 rth |
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A Revista publica única e exclusivamente artigos inéditos. São reservados à Revista todos os direitos de veiculação e publicação dos artigos presentes no periódico.
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
