BURGE ON THE SUPPOSED INDEXICALITY OF NATURAL KIND DESIGNATORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v12i2.4195Keywords:
externalism, meaning, reference, indexicalityAbstract
In the 1970s, Hilary Putnam defended the thesis that natural kinds designators, words such as “water”, “tiger” and “gold”, are indexicals, because their meaning change in each context. However, Tyler Burge rejected this argument, and Putnam came to adopt his position.The rejection of Burge is supported by the distinction between beliefs de re and beliefs de dicto. In this article we will see the points of contact between the positions of Putnam and Burge, the position of Putnam in 1970s, the main points of Burge’s argument against the indexicality of natural kinds names, and the difference between beliefs de re and beliefs de dicto.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.













