INTERNALISM ABOUT REASONS AND THE PROCEDURAL CONCEPTION OF CORRECT DELIBERATION

Authors

  • Tiaraju Andreazza Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v20i2.34932

Keywords:

Reasons, Explanatory Dimension, Deliberative Dimension, Procedural Conception.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss Bernard Williams’s theory of reasons for action. Following the introduction and analysis of its main concepts (internalist condition, explanatory and deliberative dimensions, normative reasons) and the identification of the argument that it is offered in its favor and against alternative positions, I analyze the objection that the soundness of this argument depends on the acceptance of a procedural conception of correct deliberation that Williams would have assumed, without offering any argument, as true. I argue that this objection is false because it is possible to identify in his writings a supplementary argument justifying his preference for a procedural conception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tiaraju Andreazza, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.

Doutorando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Universidade do Vale dos Sinos.


A área de estudos é metaética, normativadade e racionalidade prática.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-06

How to Cite

ANDREAZZA, Tiaraju. INTERNALISM ABOUT REASONS AND THE PROCEDURAL CONCEPTION OF CORRECT DELIBERATION. Philósophos a journal of philosophy, Goiânia, v. 20, n. 2, p. 197–225, 2016. DOI: 10.5216/phi.v20i2.34932. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/philosophos/article/view/34932. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2015): Fluxo contínuo da Revista

Section

Artigos Originais

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

- Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.