FALSIFICATION, DEDUCTOIN, AND SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT: A STUDY ON BACHELARD AND POPPER

Authors

  • Teresa Castelão Lawless Grad Valley University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v17i1.17102

Keywords:

epistemologia, science, inference, scientific practice.

Abstract

This article is a comparative analysis between the scientific epistemologies of two authors who are fundamental in twentieth-century philosophy of science, Gaston Bachelard and Karl Popper. As it will be seen, there are points of contact between the positions here presented. But thare are also fundamental dibergencies which help us understand in better detail that which the Anglo-Saxon tradition usually calls models of “scientific practice”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Teresa Castelão Lawless, Grad Valley University

Filosofia e história das ciências Grand Valley University USA

Published

2012-09-15

How to Cite

LAWLESS, T. C. FALSIFICATION, DEDUCTOIN, AND SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT: A STUDY ON BACHELARD AND POPPER. Philósophos a journal of philosophy, Goiânia, v. 17, n. 1, p. 159–173, 2012. DOI: 10.5216/phi.v17i1.17102. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/philosophos/article/view/17102. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Dossiê de Artigos Originais