<em>EPISTÉME</em> AND <em>GNÔSIS</em>, SCIENCE AND WISDOM: ABOUT THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING AT THE THOUGHT OF THE YOUNG NIETZSCHE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v16i2.15257Keywords:
science, understanding, knowledge, wisdom.Abstract
Since a reading of young Nietzsche’s criticism of the desire of knowledge that guides modernity – particularly regarding to the distinctions he operated between: a) two postures facing reality: the theoretical optimism and the tragic pessimism; and b) two types of man: the theoretical and the artist ones; and c) two kinds of philosophy and philosophers: the one of the desperate knowledge and the other, of the tragic knowledge – we aim to defend, as an access-key to nietzschean’s thought from the period of The Birth of Tragedy, the presence of a larger, gnosiological distinction between two forms of access to real: via knowledge [Erkenntni?] and via understanding [Verständnis] – ???????? [epistéme] and ?????? [gnôsis] –, leading respectively to the targets of science and wisdom.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.













