OVERDETERMINATION OF MORAL LIFE IN THE FACE OF BIOLOGICAL LIFE - KANTIAN APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS ISSUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v17i2.14764Keywords:
Autonomy. Beneficence. Kant. Biological life. Moral life.Abstract
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how, in spite of overdetermination, moral and bio-logical life articulate; not only observing the amplitude of that over the latter, but highlighting the role of moral life when signifying biological life, whether it is human or another species'. In this scope we can ask: through which ways can one signify biological life? Is it possible to escape the conscience paradigm and be morally worthy in either life? To answer this we will analyze the § 42 in the Critique of Faculty of Judgement, from which we will show the Kantian's moral aspect about inanimate and animated nature. Following, we will articulate the pragmatic and practical character in the human and non human relation. After, we will defend not the overdetermination of one upon the other, but the direct relation between them.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.













