OCKHAMIST LOGIC, ANTIOCKHAMIST LOGIC: THE MAIN ISSUES IN CONTROVERSY

Authors

  • Carolina Julieta Fernández UBA - CONICET (ARGENTINA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v16i1.12500

Keywords:

nominalism, realism, Ockham, Pseudo Campsall.

Abstract

This paper is a comparative analysis of the Logica Campsale Anglici, valde utilis et realis contra Ocham, from an anonymous author known as pseudo Richard of Campsall, and Ockham’s Summa logicae, in answer to which the former was written. We summarize both authors’s fundamental positions on five key issues: 1) the synonymy between abstract and concrete terms, 2) the reference of primary and secondary intentions, 3) the nature of the relations of predication between terms in propositions, 4) the status of the “passions of the soul” and 5) the prime signification of spoken words. Our aim is to sketch the polemic between Nominalism and Realism in the second decade of the XIVth century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carolina Julieta Fernández, UBA - CONICET (ARGENTINA)

Investigadora Adjunta del CONICET. Area de trabajo: Filosofía medieval - Ontología y semántica del S. XIV - Guillermo de Ockham. Lugar de trabajo: Sección de Estudios de Filosofía Medieval, Instituto de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Published

2010-12-07

How to Cite

FERNÁNDEZ, C. J. OCKHAMIST LOGIC, ANTIOCKHAMIST LOGIC: THE MAIN ISSUES IN CONTROVERSY. Philósophos a journal of philosophy, Goiânia, v. 16, n. 1, p. DOI: 10.5216/phi.v16i1.12500, 2010. DOI: 10.5216/phi.v16i1.12500. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/philosophos/article/view/12500. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais