EVALUATION OF EXTRACTION, CLEANING AND PURIFICATION METHODS OF AFLATOXINS FOR HPLC ANALYSIS
Keywords:
Recovery, aflatoxins, extraction methods, immunoaffinity, HPLCAbstract
A comparative evaluation process was carried out between two methods of aflatoxins extraction, cleaning, and purification, for High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The first one is the physical-chemical method, based on chemical reactions for all the stages, and the second makes use of a immunoaffinity column (IAC). The methods were evaluated as related to recovery percentage, cost, time spent for analysis, and number of samples analyzed per day. The recovery percentage obtained through the physical-chemical method was lower than the IAC method to B1, B2 and G1 aflatoxins, and higher to G2 aflatoxin. Both techniques presented recovery percentages in accordance with established values by the European Community (70% to 120%). Concerning costs, the physical-chemical method showed to be the least expensive, but its analysis process takes more time, because it involves more steps and demands more caution from laboratory technicians. Despite its higher cost, about six times higher than the physicalchemical method, the IAC method showed to be faster and easier to perform.
KEY-WORDS: Recovery; aflatoxins; extraction methods; immunoaffinity; HPLC.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors will not be paid for published articles and must waive their copyright in favor of the PAT journal. On the other hand, they are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal. Authors are allowed to publish their articles simultaneously in their institutional repositories, as soon as the original publication at the PAT journal is mentioned.