CIRCULATING PROFILE OF ROTAVIRUS A, G AND P GENOTYPES BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINE INTRODUCTION IN THE BRAZILIAN MID-WEST 1986-2015

Authors

  • Tâmera Nunes Vieira Almeida
  • Teresinha Teixeira de Sousa
  • Menira Souza
  • Fabíola Souza Fiaccadori
  • Kareem Rady Badr
  • Divina das Dôres de Paula Cardoso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v46i1.46300

Keywords:

Rotavirus infections, genotype, vaccination.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of Rotavirus A (RVA) G and P genotypes circulating in the Brazilian Mid-West in the period 1986-2015. Seven studies conducted from 1986 to 2009 were included, as well as fecal samples obtained in the period 2014-2015. RVA was screened by ELISA and/or PAGE; genotyping by conventional RT-PCR and/or genomic sequencing. A temporal variation in the predominance of G genotypes mainly G1 and G2 with G9 and G12 emergence was observed. Even with vaccination, RVA continues
to circulate in the population, requiring continuous virus monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-07

How to Cite

NUNES VIEIRA ALMEIDA, T.; TEIXEIRA DE SOUSA, T.; SOUZA, M.; SOUZA FIACCADORI, F.; RADY BADR, K.; DAS DÔRES DE PAULA CARDOSO, D. CIRCULATING PROFILE OF ROTAVIRUS A, G AND P GENOTYPES BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINE INTRODUCTION IN THE BRAZILIAN MID-WEST 1986-2015. Revista de Patologia Tropical / Journal of Tropical Pathology, Goiânia, v. 46, n. 1, p. 105–112, 2017. DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v46i1.46300. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/iptsp/article/view/46300. Acesso em: 18 sep. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 46 No. 1 (2017)

Section

SHORT REPORT

License

The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.

The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.