Institutional capacity for the care of people with chronic diseases in primary health care

Authors

  • Elaine Amaral de Paula Instituto Federal de Ensino Tecnológico do Sudeste de Minas Gerais (IF Sudeste MG), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil, elaine.amaral@ifsudestemg.edu.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9103-297X
  • Eda Schwartz Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, eda.schwartz@ufpel.edu.br.
  • Bruno Pereira Nunes Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, bruno.nunes@ufpel.edu.br.
  • Bianca Pozza dos Santos Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, bi.santos@bol.com.br.
  • Alberto Barceló Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil, albeto.barcelo@ufjf.edu.br.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v24.68990

Keywords:

Chronic Disease, Quality of Health Care, Self Care, Primary Health Care, Evaluation of Research Programs and Tools

Abstract

Objective: to investigate the institutional capacity for the care of people with chronic non-communicable diseases in primary health care. Method: cross-sectional, quantitative and exploratory study. Data collection used the questionnaire, translated and adapted for Brazil, Assessment of Chronic Illness Care. Data collection took place between December 2017 and June 2018. 159 professionals working in 49 primary health care units responded to the instrument. Results: the ability to care for people with chronic diseases was classified as basic. The components with the best and worst scores were the design of the service delivery system and clinical decision support, respectively. Conclusion: the results of this study showed that it is necessary to invest primarily in expert feedback on counter-reference, partnerships with the community, especially in units that work in the traditional model, and training of professionals to support self-care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 apr 15];388(10053):1659-724. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8.

Malta DC, França E, Abreu DMX, Perillo RD, Salmen MC, Teixeira RA, et al. Mortality due to noncommunicable diseases in Brazil, 1990 to 2015, according to estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study. Sao Paulo Med. J. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 apr 15];135(3):213-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0330050117,

Pedraza CC. Financiamiento de redes integradas de servicios de salud. Rev Panam Salud Publica [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 apr 15];44:e121. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.121.

Malta DC, Oliveira TP, Santos MAS, Andrade SSCA, Silva MMA. Avanços do Plano de Ações Estratégicas para o Enfrentamento das Doenças Crônicas não Transmissíveis no Brasil, 2011-2015. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 apr 15];25(2):373-90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742016000200016.

Ghiyasvandian S, Shahsavari H, Matourypour P, Golestannejad MR. Integrated Care model: Transition from acute to chronic care. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 apr 15];74(5):e20200910. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0910.

Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2022 apr 15];1(1):2-4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10345255/.

Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2022 apr 15];37(3):791-820. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00049.

Schwab GL, Moysés ST, Kusma SZ, Ignácio SA, Moysés SJ. Percepção de inovações na atenção às Doenças/Condições Crônicas: uma pesquisa avaliativa em Curitiba. Saúde debate [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2022 apr 15];38(spe):307-18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-1104.2014S023.

Costa KC, Cazola LHO, Tamaki EM. Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): avaliação da aplicabilidade e resultados. Saúde debate [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 apr 15];40(108):106-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104-20161080009.

Ministério da Saúde; Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução Nº 466 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde, de 12 de dezembro de 2012 (BR) [Internet]. Aprova as diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial da União. 13 jun. 2013 [cited 2022 apr 15]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html.

Steurer-Stey C, Frei A, Schmid-Mohler G, Malcolm-Kohler S, Zoller M, Rosemann T. The German version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care: instrument translation and cultural adaptation. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2022 apr 15];18(1):1-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01511.x.

Lagos ME, Salazar A, Luengo LH. Evaluación de la atención a usuarios con enfermedad crónica cardiovascular en Centros de Salud Familiar. Rev Chil Cardiol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 apr 15];35(2):99-108. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-85602016000200002.

Barceló A, Cafiero E, Boer M, Mesa AE, Lopez MG, Jiménez RA, et al. Using collaborative learning to improve diabetes care and outcomes: the VIDA project. Prim Care Diabetes [Internet]. 2010 [Internet];4(3):145-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2010.04.005.

Gonçalves Junior O, Gava GB, Silva MS. Programa Mais Médicos, aperfeiçoando o SUS e democratizando a saúde: um balanço analítico do programa. Saude soc. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 apr 15];26(4):872-87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902017170224.

West JF. Public health program planning logic model for community engaged type 2 diabetes management and prevention. Eval Program Plann [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2022 apr 15];42:43-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.09.001.

Salci MA, Meirelles BHS, Silva DMGV. Primary care for diabetes mellitus patients from the perspective of the care model for chronic conditions. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 apr 15];25:e2882. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1474.2882.

Sopcak N, Aguilar C, O'Brien MA, Nykiforuk C, Aubrey-Bassler K, Cullen R, et al. Implementation of the BETTER 2 program: a qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of a novel way to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 apr 15];11(1):158. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0525-0.

Jeffs L, Kuluski K, Law M, Saragosa M, Espin S, Ferris E, et al. Identifying Effective Nurse-Led Care Transition Interventions for Older Adults With Complex Needs Using a Structured Expert Panel. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 apr 15];14(2):136-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12196.

Erwin PC, McNeely CS, Grubaugh JH, Valentine J, Miller MD, Buchanan M. A Logic Model for Evaluating the Academic Health Department. J Public Health Manag Pract [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 apr 15];22(2):182-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000236.

Tasca R, Massuda A, Carvalho WM, Buchweitz C, Harzheim E. Recomendações para o fortalecimento da atenção primária à saúde no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 apr 15];44:e4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.4.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-29

Issue

Vol. 24 (2022)

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.