Pre-simulation, pre-briefing or briefing in nursing simulation: what are the differences?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v22.60171Keywords:
Nursing, Students, Nursing, Simulation Technique, Clinical CompetenceAbstract
Objective: To identify the scientific evidence available in the literature on the elements of pre-simulation and pre-briefing/briefing phases and their differences for the development of clinical competence in nursing. Method: Integrative review conducted from January 2009 to May 2020, on the PubMed/MEDLINE®, LILACS, Scopus and CINAHL databases, with the descriptors: nursing, nursing student, nursing team, pre-simulation, pre-briefing, briefing and clinical competence. Results: 687 studies were identified and seven were included. The following categories were created: Elements of the pre-simulation and pre-briefing/ briefing phases in clinical simulation in nursing and Differences of the pre-simulation and pre-briefing/briefing phases in clinical simulation in nursing. The following four elements were highlighted: the concept of the phase, objectives, actions and required resources. The differences were identified as the period of each phase, the objectives and the instructional resources. Conclusion: This review synthesizes and clarifies the elements of the preparation stage and their differences, thus enabling the creation of educational scripts for clinical simulation.
Downloads
References
Mendonça AR, Queluci GC, Dias SFC, Souza VR. Estratégias de aprendizagem ativa em Enfermagem. Revista Pró-UniverSUS [Internet]. 2017 [access at: June 17, 2020];8 (2):117-20. Available at: http://editora.universidadedevassouras.edu.br/index.php/RPU/article/view/1104.
Duarte KAS, Barros RL, Santos L, Calazans MIP, Gomes RM, Duarte ACS. Importância da Metodologia Ativa na formação do enfermeiro: implicações no processo ensino aprendizagem. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde [Internet]. 2019 [access at: June 17, 2020];36: e2022. Available at: https://acervomais.com.br/index.php/saude/article/view/2022/1126. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e2022.2019.
Campbell SH. Clinical simulation for teaching in health. Rev Eletr Enferm [Internet]. 2019 [access at: June 17, 2020];21:57520. Available at: https://www.revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/57250/33729. https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v21.57250.
Kim J, Park JH, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation- based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2016 [access at: June 17, 2020];16:152. Available at: http://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7.
INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM Simulation Design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2016 [access at: June 18, 2020]; 12(S):S5-S12. Available at: https://www.nursingsimulation.org/action/showPdf?pii=S1876-1399%2816%293012. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005.
Tyerman J, Luctjkar-Flude M, Graham L, Coffey S, Olsen-Lynch E. A Systematic Review of Health Care Presimulation Preparation and Briefing Effectiveness. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2019 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];27:12-25. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330801525_A_Systematic_Review_of_Health_Care_Presimulation_Preparation_and_Briefing_Effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.002.
Fabri RP, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Fonseca AS, Pedersoli CE, Miranda FBG, et al. Development of a theoretical-practical script for clinical simulation. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2017 [access at: June 18, 2020];51:e03218. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342017000100418. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2016265103218.
Leigh GT, Steuben F. Setting learners up for success: presimulation and prebriefing strategies. Teaching and Learning in Nursing [Internet]. 2018 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];13(3):185-9. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324954400_Setting_Learners_up_for_Success_Presimulation_and_Prebriefing_Strategies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.004.
Luctkar MF, Cutrara PP. Simulation approaches. In: Bradley P. Becoming a nurse educator in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing; 2019.p.56.
Iglesias AG, Pazin-Filho A. Emprego de simulações no ensino e na avaliação. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto) [Internet]. 2015 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];48(3):233- 40. Available at: http://www.revistas.usp.br/rmrp/article/view/104308. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.v48i3p233-240.
Ignacio J, Scherpbier A, Dolmans D, Rethans JJ, Liaw SY. Mental rehearsal strategy for stress management and performance in simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2017 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];13(7):295-302. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1876139917300440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.04.005.
Sharoff L. Simulation: Pre-briefing, Preparation, Clinical Judgment and Reflection. What is the Connection? Journal of Contemporary Medicine [Internet]. 2015 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];5(2):88-101. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/82025. https://doi.org/10.16899/ctd.49922.
Chmil JV. Prebriefing in Simulation-Based Learning Experiences. Nurse Educ. 2016;41(2):64-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000217.
Chamberlain J. Prebriefing in nursing simulation: a concept analysis using Rodger’s Methodology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2015 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];11(7):318- 22. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282600643_Prebriefing_in_Nursing_Simulation_A_Concept_Analysis_Using_Rodger’s_Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.003.
Gantt LT. The effect of preparation on anxiety and performance in summative simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(1):25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.07.004.
Franklin AE, Sideras S, Gubrud-Howe P, Lee CS. Comparison of expert modeling versus voice-over PowerPoint lecture and presimulation readings on novice nurses’ competence of providing care to multiple patients. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(11):615-22. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20141023-01.
Page-Cutrara K. Prebriefing in nursing simulation: a concept analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. 2015 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];11(7):335-40. Available at: https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035448651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.001.
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2005 [access at: Aug. 26, 2019];52(5):546-53. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.465.9393&rep=rep1&type=pdf. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
Page-Cutrara K. Use of prebriefing in nursing simulation: a literature review. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):136-41. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140211-07.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
Ursi ES, Galvão CM. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev Latino-Am Enferm [Internet]. 2006 [access at: June, 17 2020];14(1):124-31. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v14n1/v14n1a17. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000100017.
Minayo MCS. Amostragem e saturação em pesquisa qualitativa: consensos e controvérsias. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa [Internet]. 2017 [access at: 17 jun.2020];5(7):1-12. Available at: https://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/article/view/82/59.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Steinemann S, Bhatt A, Suares G, Wei A, Ho N, Kurosawa G, et al. Trauma Team Discord and the Role of Briefing. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(1):184- 9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001024.
Roh YS, Ahn JW, Kim E, Kim J. Effects of Prebriefing on Psychological Safety and Learning Outcomes. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018;25:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.10.001.
Kim YJ, Noh GO, Im YS. Effect of Step-Based Prebriefing Activities on Flow and Clinical Competency of Nursing Students in Simulation-Based Education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2017;13(11):544-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.06.005.
Chamberlain J. The Impact of Simulation Prebriefing on Perceptions of Overall Effectiveness, Learning, and Self-Confidence in Nursing Students. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2017;38(3):119-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000135.
Coram C. Expert Role Modeling Effect on Novice Nursing Students’ Clinical Judgment. 2016;12(9):385- 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.009.
Franklin AE, Sideras S, Gubrud-Howe P, Lee CS. Comparison of Expert Modeling Versus Voice-Over PowerPoint Lecture and Presimulation Readings on Novice Nurses’ Competence of Providing Care to Multiple Patients. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;53(11):615- 22. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20141023-01.
Beverly JDB. Interactive pre-simulation strategies: engaging students in experiential learning from the start. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. 2014;12(1):69-75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
