THE NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY OF THE CITY OF FORTALEZA/CE

Authors

  • Maria Elisa Zanella Universidade Federal do Ceará
  • Eustógio Wanderley Correia Dantas Universidade Federal do Ceará
  • João Luís Sampaio Olímpio Universidade Federal do Ceará

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/bgg.v31i2.16842

Abstract

The limitations imposed by environmental systems have rarely been taken fully into account during the occupation and development of cities anywhere in the World. In the present day, there is a growing need to consider these limitations in order to guarantee environmental quality for the inhabitants of this territorial space, as well as to ensure the avoidance of future environmental risks. In this context, the present study focused on the natural and environmental vulnerability of the municipality of Fortaleza, in the Brazilian state of Ceará, with the primary aim of contributing to the urban-environmental planning of the city. To this end, the areas of the municipality most vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts will be identified, as will the potential of its environmental systems.  Based on the ecodynamic approach (founded on the concepts of the stability/instability of environments), integrated with considerations on the quality of the urban infrastructure, a Geographic Information System approach was developed for the production and integration of maps covering the geology, geomorphology, pedology, vegetation cover, and quality of the urban infrastructure. These analyses provided maps of the natural and environmental vulnerability of Fortaleza, which indicate that the most vulnerable areas are located in the proximity of rivers, lakes, and dune fields, where the urban infrastructure is precarious, and thus subject to greater risks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-01-11

How to Cite

ELISA ZANELLA, M.; WANDERLEY CORREIA DANTAS, E.; LUÍS SAMPAIO OLÍMPIO, J. THE NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY OF THE CITY OF FORTALEZA/CE. Goiano Bulletin of Geography, Goiânia, v. 31, n. 2, p. 13–27, 2012. DOI: 10.5216/bgg.v31i2.16842. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/bgg/article/view/16842. Acesso em: 16 aug. 2024.