Spatial and spatiotemporal distribution of Schistosoma mansoni cases in the state of Alagoas, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v54i4.82374Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the occurrence of Schistosoma mansoni in the State of Alagoas, Brazil, over space and time from 2012 to 2021. An ecological, quantitative, and spatiotemporal study was conducted using secondary data from the Schistosomiasis Control and Surveillance System (SISPCE/DATASUS). Data were aggregated by health regions (HR) and municipalities. During the study period, 1,466,100 examinations were performed, and 73,325 cases of schistosomiasis were diagnosed. Spatial analysis showed that 20 municipalities had moderate positivity rates (5.1 – 15.0%), and one municipality had a high positivity rate above 15.1%. Global Moran’s Index indicated significant positive spatial autocorrelation (I= 0.52308; p= 0.001). The Local Moran’s Index identified 16 municipalities with a high-high pattern, distributed across the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 6th HR. The space-time scan analysis revealed two significant risk clusters. The primary cluster comprised 50 municipalities, predominantly located in the 3rd, 4th, and 6th HR, showing a relative risk (RR) of 11.06 (p< 0.001). The proportion of infections classified as severe was below 1%. These findings highlight the persistence of high-risk areas for schistosomiasis in Alagoas, concentrated in specific health regions, and are aligned with WHO goals to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem.
KEY WORDS: Epidemiology; neglected diseases; public health; Schistosoma mansoni.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.