Evaluation of prophylactic antibiotics for surgery in an university hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v38i3.8124Keywords:
Antibiotic, Prophylaxis, SurgeryAbstract
The inappropriate prescription of prophylactic antibiotics favors selection of resistantbacteria. We aimed to characterize the inappropriate prescription of prophylactic
antibiotics; their indication, selected spectrum, dose and duration of prophylaxis
in an university hospital in Goiania, Brazil. We also aimed to propose adjustments
in the requirements for prescription, according to the literature. Through structured
questionnaire the specialty in which the antibiotic was prescribed, type of surgery,
indications, spectrum of action, dose and specified duration were evaluated. 203
surgical procedures were evaluated (64% clean surgery, 30% clean-contaminated
and 6% contaminated). Cefazolin was the antibiotic most used (92%). Inappropriate
prescribing was found in 75% of cases, from those 77% were due to the excessive
duration of administration of the antimicrobial agent. In 18% of surgeries there was
no indication of prophylaxis and in 9% suboptimal doses of antimicrobial were used.
The estimated additional cost of requirements not indicated and excessive duration
was equivalent to US$ 800.00. We recognize the need for a joint working committee
between surgical and hospital infection control teams, enabling reduction of costs
and avoiding selection of resistant bacterial strains, among other adverse effects.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.