Neurosyphilis in patients at a university hospital in the central west region of Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v52i2.75654Abstract
Syphilis remains a significant public health concern, and the central nervous system (CNS) involvement may occur at any stage of infection. Neurosyphilis must be ruled out in patients diagnosed with syphilis and exhibiting neurological or psychiatric symptoms, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination should be performed prior to treatment. A cohort of patients with neurosyphilis (aged ≥18 years old) was studied in a university hospital in the Central West Region of Brazil from 2018 to 2021. Twenty-four patients met the criteria for inclusion of confirmed neurosyphilis; 17 (70%) were male, with a median age of 37.5 (22–64). Six were asymptomatic, one had isolated otosyphilis, 11 had ocular syphilis, one had both ocular and otosyphilis, and five had other neurological symptoms. Thirteen patients (54%) were coinfected with HIV. Visual changes (50%) were the most common symptom; otosyphilis was present in 8.3%. Fourteen patients (58%) had positive VDRL in the CSF, and the median CSF-VDRL titer was 1:4. The cure rate was 87%, with three cases having persistent CSF-VDRL positivity after six months from the first treatment. It was concluded that understanding neurosyphilis, its clinical diversity, and its epidemiological and laboratory profile allows early diagnosis and treatment, consequently reducing its morbidity.
KEY WORDS: Syphilis; neurosyphilis; otosyphilis; ocular syphilis; HIV.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.