FREQUENCY OF CCR5?32 MUTATION IN BLOOD DONOR CANDIDATES FROM THE FUNDAÇÃO HOSPITALAR DE HEMATOLOGIA E HEMOTERAPIA DO AMAZONAS, BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v46i3.49413Keywords:
Genetic polymorphism, HIV-1, Amazon.Abstract
The chemokine receptor CCR5 is a major co-receptor for HIV-1 entry into the host cell. Deletion of 32 bp (?32) alters the receptor structure and is associated with the protection against infection. The distribution of allelic variant depends on several factors influencing the epidemiology of HIV infections. Thus, the present study sought to estimate the allelic frequency of the CCR5 gene variant / CCR5?32 in blood donor candidates with and without positive serology for HIV-1+ at the HEMOAM Foundation. 239 candidates were enrolled and divided into two groups, HIV-1+ (101 individuals) and HIV- controls (138 individuals). After collecting peripheral blood, DNA was extracted and allele-specific PCR for identification of CCR5?32 polymorphism, was performed. The results obtained were analyzed using Stata (v.13). The groups were of similar ages, predominantly male and the distribution of genotypes and alleles were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p=0.725 and p=0.879, respectively). The highest frequency was wild genotype, followed by the heterozygous genotype in both groups (control and the HIV-1+ ). When the frequencies in HIV-1+ subgroups were analyzed, the absence of the allelic variant CCR5?32 subgroup ELISA(+) Westen Blot(+) was noted. Therefore, our data indicate that CCR5?32 polymorphism has a low frequency in the population studied.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.