EVALUATION OF SCHISTOSOMAL ACTIVITY OF CARVACROL IN IN VIVO AND IN IN VITRO EXPERIMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v45i2.41957Keywords:
Schistosoma mansoni, schistosomiasis, chemotherapyAbstract
The schistosomal activity of carvacrol and carvacrol acetate was studied using Swiss mice weighing about 20g and infected with Schistosoma mansoni cercariae, in in vitro and in vivo experiments, as described in this paper. Two in vitro experiments were performed using 4 or 8?g/mL. For the in vivo experiments, one group of 10 mice was treated orally with 300g/ kg for five consecutive days. Two other groups with 10 mice each were treated orally with single doses of 15 and 30mg/kg respectively. Both compounds proved active, at the 4?g/mL concentration, causing the death of adult S. mansoni worms in less than 24 hours for the in vitro tests. In the in vivo experiments no significant schistosomal activity was observed in the oral treatment with one 15 or 30mg/animal dose of carvacrol or carvacrol acetate or when treated with 300mg/kg during five consecutive days. In the in vivo experiments no significant schistosomal activity was noted considering all the chemotherapy regimens tested. We have, therefore, concluded that the compounds are effective considering in vitro trials, but do not present in vivo activity. These findings suggest that carvacrol and carvacrol acetate should not be considered schistosomicidal agents for clinical testing. It is important to bear in mind that in vitro trials are useful but they are a simulation of reality and one approach does definitely not replace the other.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.