FREQUENCY OF INTESTINAL PARASITES AND COMMENSALS IN STREET WASTE PICKERS FROM TWO COOPERATIVES IN THE BRAZILIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v44i4.39238Keywords:
Parasites, commensals, waste pickers, Federal District, Brazil.Abstract
This study describes the occurrence of intestinal parasites and commensals among street waste pickers (SWPs) of two cooperatives of recyclable materials in the Federal District, Brazil. Stool samples from 75 individuals were analyzed using the Rugai method and spontaneous sedimentation. A questionnaire was applied to assess the awareness of SWPs regarding diseases caused by garbage handling and their prevention methods. Sixty SWPs (80%) were diagnosed with intestinal helminths or protozoa. The most frequent protozoa found were Entamoeba coli (43%), Endolimax nana (28%), and Entamoeba hartmanni (15%), and helminths such as Ascaris lumbricoides (12%), hookworms (8%), and Strongyloides stercoralis (8%) were also found. Other species identified in the workers were E. histolytica/dispar (8%), Giardia lamblia (7%), Hymenolepis diminuta (3%), and Hymenolepis nana (3%). Thirty nine SWPs (65%) had mixed infections. Most (80%) SWPs reported having parasitic diseases in the past, and 72% reported having undergone a stool test. All individuals considered important to use personal protective equipment but only 40% wore gloves. The adoption of healthy hygiene habits and the proper use of personal protective equipment should decrease the occurrence of intestinal parasites in these individuals.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.