SEROPREVALENCE AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH Toxoplasma gondii INFECTION IN HUMANS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH CONTACT WITH DOMESTIC CATS (Felis catus) IN SOUTHERN RIO GRANDE DO SUL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v44i2.36640Keywords:
Toxoplasmosis, risk factors, cats, epidemiology.Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii is the agent of a protozoan zoonotic disease of public health importance,toxoplasmosis, which may have serious consequences on the infected species. Cats are definitivehosts of the protozoan, and once infected, shed oocysts that sporulate in the environment and maybecome a source of infection for humans. The results reported by different authors about contactwith pet cats as a risk factor for human infection are controversial. In this study, serum samples from108 individuals who own or owned cats, and from 110 individuals who do not like cats and neverowned one, were analyzed for the presence of IgG antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii through IndirectImmunofluorescence (IFI). An epidemiological questionnaire was also applied. The seroprevalencewas 39.8% for the 108 individuals who owned cats and 26.4% for the 110 individuals who neverowned cats. The analysis of risk factors showed significant association between seropositivity andthe variables: aged over 31 years (p=0.0000), contact with cats (p=0.0143), and handling of rawmeat (p=0.0290). Our findings indicate that even in a population with a high education level, contactwith cats may double the chances of infection with T. gondii, when the animals are not kept indoorsand under adequate sanitary conditions.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.