GNATHOPLEURA QUADRIDENTATA (HIYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE: ALYSIINAE), A NEW NATURAL ENEMY OF PECKIA CHRYSOSTOMA (WIEDEMANN) (DIPTERA: SARCOPHAGIDAE) IN BRAZIL

Authors

  • Carlos Henrique Marchiori
  • Otacílio Moreira Silva Filho
  • Francilene Cardoso Alves Fortes
  • Patrícia Luzia Pereira Gonçalves
  • Rélia Rodrigues Brunes
  • Juliana Fischer Laurindo
  • Rauer Ferreira Borges

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v33i2.3449

Abstract

This note reports for the first time the occurrence of the parasitoid Gnathopleura quadridentata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) parasitizing pupae of Peckia chrysostoma (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in Brazil. The flues were collected with traps baited with bovine liver in a wooded area in the vicinity of the Parque da Serra de Caldas Novas, Goiás, from September to December, 2003. A total of four specimens of the parasitoid G. quadridentata were reared from a total of 65 pupae of P. chrysostoma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-03-07

How to Cite

MARCHIORI, C. H.; SILVA FILHO, O. M.; FORTES, F. C. A.; GONÇALVES, P. L. P.; BRUNES, R. R.; LAURINDO, J. F.; BORGES, R. F. GNATHOPLEURA QUADRIDENTATA (HIYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE: ALYSIINAE), A NEW NATURAL ENEMY OF PECKIA CHRYSOSTOMA (WIEDEMANN) (DIPTERA: SARCOPHAGIDAE) IN BRAZIL. Revista de Patologia Tropical / Journal of Tropical Pathology, Goiânia, v. 33, n. 2, p. 243–246, 2008. DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v33i2.3449. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/iptsp/article/view/3449. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 2 (2004)

Section

SHORT COMMUNICATION

License

The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.

The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.